Cross-Cultural Studies on Mate Preferences and Relationships

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/57

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

58 Terms

1
New cards

Aim of Buss (1989)

To investigate cross-cultural similarities and differences in mate preferences between males and females.

2
New cards

Participants and countries in Buss's study

Over 10,000 participants from 33 countries (37 samples).

3
New cards

Method used by Buss (1989)

Survey with standardized questions about mate preferences.

4
New cards

Characteristics females rated higher than males

Good financial prospects, ambition, and older age.

5
New cards

Traits males consistently preferred

Youth, physical attractiveness, and chastity.

6
New cards

Buss's findings and evolutionary theory

They show gender-based patterns in mate preferences consistent with maximizing reproductive success.

7
New cards

Major limitation of using surveys

Self-report bias and cultural interpretation may affect accuracy.

8
New cards

Key ethical considerations in Buss (1989)

Confidentiality and cultural sensitivity in question framing.

9
New cards

Hormone investigated in Scheele et al. (2012)

Oxytocin.

10
New cards

Tasks participants completed in Scheele et al. (2012)

The stop-distance paradigm and the approach/avoidance joystick task.

11
New cards

Effect of oxytocin on men in relationships

They kept greater distance from attractive women and avoided attractive female images.

12
New cards

Sample size and composition in Scheele et al. (2012)

86 heterosexual men, some single and some in committed relationships.

13
New cards

Importance of the double-blind method in Scheele's study

It controlled for experimenter and participant bias.

14
New cards

Relation of Scheele's study to fidelity in relationships

It shows that oxytocin may biologically promote monogamous behavior.

15
New cards

Strength and limitation of Scheele's lab experiment

Strength: cause-effect conclusions; Limitation: low ecological validity.

16
New cards

Ethical guideline upheld in Scheele's study

Informed consent.

17
New cards

Setting of Ronay & von Hippel's study

A naturalistic skate park setting.

18
New cards

Tasks skateboarders were asked to perform

Easy and difficult tricks, each repeated 10 times.

19
New cards

Role of the attractive female researcher

To observe participants and serve as a social stimulus.

20
New cards

Biological change observed in the presence of an attractive woman

Increased testosterone levels.

21
New cards

Study suggestion about evolutionary mating strategies

Men may take more risks as a mating display to signal fitness.

22
New cards

Ecological validity of Ronay & von Hippel's study

It was conducted in a real-world setting with a natural task.

23
New cards

Ethical risk faced by participants in Ronay & von Hippel's study

Potential physical injury from attempting difficult tricks.

24
New cards

Relation of risk-taking to interpersonal relationships

Displays of strength and risk-taking may function as biological mating signals.

25
New cards

Main hypothesis of Markey & Markey (2007)

People are attracted to romantic partners with similar personality traits.

26
New cards

Assessment of participants' personalities and preferences in Markey & Markey

Using standardized self-report personality surveys.

27
New cards

Trend found regarding similar traits in romantic partners

Participants preferred partners who were similar to themselves.

28
New cards

Method used in Markey & Markey and its advantage

Survey method; standardized and easy to replicate.

29
New cards

Key limitation of using self-report surveys

Social desirability bias and inaccurate self-perception.

30
New cards

Cognitive approach to relationship formation

Attraction is influenced by perceived similarity and mental representations.

31
New cards

Aim of Moreland & Beach (1992)

To investigate the effect of repeated exposure on perceived attractiveness.

32
New cards

Confederates in Moreland & Beach study

Four women who attended a different number of psychology lectures without interaction.

33
New cards

Manipulated variable in Moreland & Beach experiment

The number of times each woman was seen in class.

34
New cards

Traits rated by participants in Moreland & Beach study

Attractiveness, intelligence, honesty, success, etc.

35
New cards

Main finding of Moreland & Beach study

Greater exposure led to higher attractiveness ratings.

36
New cards

Mere exposure effect

People tend to like others more the more frequently they see them.

37
New cards

Strengths of Moreland & Beach method

Ecological validity, real-life setting.

38
New cards

Limitation of Moreland & Beach method

Lack of control over variables.

39
New cards

Theory supported by Sheldon's study

Social Penetration Theory.

40
New cards

Type of self-disclosure leading to higher trust and attraction

Disclosure of intimate and deep topics.

41
New cards

Target platform in Sheldon's study

Facebook.

42
New cards

Method used in Sheldon (2009)

Correlational survey; standardized and replicable, but prone to self-report bias and lacks causation.

43
New cards

Relation of Sheldon's study to online relationship formation

It shows that deep online self-disclosure can increase attraction and trust.

44
New cards

Topics bloggers disclosed in Tang & Wang (2012)

Personal interests and life experiences.

45
New cards

Who did bloggers disclose to most deeply?

Real-life best friends.

46
New cards

Comparison of online vs real-life self-disclosure

Real-life disclosure is deeper and more intimate than online sharing.

47
New cards

Ethical considerations for an online survey

Ensuring confidentiality and informed consent.

48
New cards

How this study relates to Social Penetration Theory

It supports the theory but suggests that real-world relationships involve deeper disclosure.

49
New cards

Model of relationship breakdown applied by LeFebvre et al. (2014)

Rollie and Duck's (2006) stage model.

50
New cards

Common behaviors during and after Facebook breakups

Deleting photos, unfriending, stalking, and impression management.

51
New cards

Main online strategies used to cope with breakups

Self-presentation, blocking, and managing digital memories.

52
New cards

Stages of Rollie & Duck's model most supported in findings

Social stage, grave-dressing, and resurrection.

53
New cards

Ethical risks in retrospective qualitative research

Psychological discomfort from recalling emotional breakups.

54
New cards

Definition of ghosting according to LeFebvre (2019)

Unilaterally ending communication through technology without closure.

55
New cards

Common reasons for ghosting someone

Convenience, safety concerns, loss of interest, and negative partner behavior.

56
New cards

Psychological impacts on the noninitiator of ghosting

Feelings of confusion, lack of closure, and distress.

57
New cards

Why is ghosting considered a digital-era phenomenon?

It relies on modern communication technology and online dating norms.

58
New cards

Ethical challenges in studying ghosting experiences

Potential emotional distress when reflecting on unresolved relationship endings.