Variables and Interpreting Graphs

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/16

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:22 PM on 7/23/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

17 Terms

1
New cards

Operationalizing Variables

Variables are anything that can change or vary (e.g., age, gender, aggression, anxiety).

  • What you’re measuring

  • Defining them - conceptual (what it means) vs. operational (how it’s measured)

  • Type of measurement

2
New cards

Construct

Variables that cannot be directly observed; traits, emotions, attitudes

3
New cards

Type of Measurement

  1. Self-report: Interviews or questionnaires, people report their beliefs, behaviour, history, etc. (has social desirability bias)

  2. Video-recordings: hint for stress cues like nail biting, fidgeting, or expressions

  3. Behavioural: observing behaviours, either lab induced or naturally occurring

  4. Physiological: assessment of bodily states, brain imaging, or heart rate monitors

4
New cards

How do you choose?

Previous research, methodological (new tech), feasibility (resource limitation)

5
New cards

Reliability

Consistency

True score - the "real" score on the variable (a person truly has an anxiety level of 50)

Obtained score - the score the measure gives (they score 55 because they were especially stressed that day)

Measurement error - difference between true score and obtained score

We want measurement error as small as possible by using reliable, valid measures.

6
New cards

To assess the reliability of report measures:

  1. Test-retest - If I give the same measurement twice with time in between, will I get a similar result?

  2. Parallel-forms - If there are different forms of the measure, do they all measure the same thing? Scores on two different version of test = same score = high parallel

  3. Internal consistency - Do all the questions on a scale measure the same thing?

  • Split-half: Compare scores from the first half of the questionnaire with the second half.

  • Cronbach's alpha (α): Measures how well all the questions are related to each other.

    • Higher α = better internal consistency

7
New cards

To assess the reliability of observational measures:

Interrater reliability

  • How consistent the results are with two/more researchers observing the participant

8
New cards

Validity

Accuracy

  1. Face Validity - does the measure look like it’s measuring what it’s meant for

  2. Content Validity - measure all the important components/parts of the construct

  3. Criterion Validity - Convergent: does it correlate with similar measures. Predictive: does it predict future expected outcomes

  4. Discriminant/divergent Validity - does not correlate with unrelated measures.

Example: A depression questionnaire should:

  • Correlate with other depression tests (good convergent validity).

  • Not strongly correlate with math ability because they measure different things.

9
New cards

Types of Data

Categorical - each value represents a discrete category where order does not matter (tiger = 1, lion = 2…)

Numerical - each value represents either a real number (age) or a place on a scale/continuum, where order does matter

10
New cards

Categorical Graphs

Pie chart (for simple data = 1), bar graph compares a series of categories as bars (for complex data)

11
New cards

Numerical Graphs

  • Histogram shows the distribution (bell curve), visual sense of the data; the mean, range, skew, possible outliers

  1. Discrete - finite number of values (dice), binned

  2. Continuous - infinite number of values (height), logged

  • Scatterplot

    • Used for two continuous variables, shows relationship

  • Line Graph

  • Time Series (changes over time)

12
New cards

Y-Axis

  • The dependent measure or the variable you're most interested in

  • Should have a reasonable range

  • Too broad, you can't see the difference (flat line)

  • Too limited, large top and bottoms/skyrocketing

13
New cards

X-Axis

  • Consistent range/scale

  • You can exaggerate small changes by zooming in

14
New cards

Truncating an Axis

Restricting range to maximize differences (exaggerate differences)

Example:

Scores are 90 and 95, but the graph starts at 89, making the difference look huge.

15
New cards

Expanding an Axis

Using too broad a range to minimize differences (hide differences)

Example:

Scores are 60 and 90, but the graph goes to 1,000, making the difference look tiny.

16
New cards

Ignoring Conventions

Values should go from small to large

Example:

Years are shown out of order, like 2024, 2022, 2023.

17
New cards

Comparing non-equivalent data

Two different Y-axis on same graph

Example:

Comparing temperature and sales using two different y-axes