1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
creationism
Belief that the universe and the world we live in were created immediately and supernaturally by God, and that the Bible is literally correct
Appeal to Bible as a scientific source, stating that it contradicts evolution
Theory of evolution attacked as just a theory
NB: misunderstands use of ‘theory’ -> refers to an established explanation that is backed up with research, and supported by scientific laws.
Gap in fossil record shows inconsistency
NB: can be explained by animals dying in not correct conditions
pastor robin fish on creationism
Pastor Robin Fish: argues that the Bible has spoken of different ‘kinds’ of v similar things (e.g. Leviticus speaks of diff kinds of owls, reptiles, lizards etc) -> what we see in scripture is a definition of living things which is inconsistent and incompatible with evolution
young earth creationism
Belief that universe was created in 6 days by Abrahamic God 6,000 years ago
Belief derived from literal interpretation of the 2 creation myths in book of Genesis
Fossils are not real and maj extinctions never occured
apparent age creationism
Earth created in a mature state
Earth is only apparently old
Doesn't explain astrological observations that some stars are new as well as old, and have complete life cycles
scientific creationism
A branch of creationism that claims to provide scientific support for the genesis creation story. Creation science is an attempt to map the Bible into scientific facts
The main ideas in creation science are:
The belief in creation ex nihilo (out of nothing)
The conviction that the earth was created in the last 6,000-10,000 years
The belief that mankind and other life on Earth were created as distinct fixed ‘baraminological’ kinds
The idea that fossils found in geological strata were deposited during a cataclysmic flood which completely covered the entire earth
intelligent design + complexities
Certain aspects of the natural world are too complex to have arise naturally, and therefore must have been as a result of an intelligent designer
Objection to evolution:
Point to complexities of world (e.g. DNA, regularity of physics) as evidence that the universe is designed by an intelligent creator
Argue that irreducible complexity (idea that certain biological systems are too complex to have evolved from less complete predecessors/ have happened by chance)
Emphasise that the apparent fine-tuned nature of universe must mean there was a designer
behe + id
Argued that certain phenomena, such as bacterial flagellum, are too irreducibly complex to have evolved from more primitive forms of life and therefore must have been created by a designer
NB: proponents of ID try to stay strictly within the bounds of science
Do not mention Abrahamic God etc, but a ‘designer’ or ‘intelligence’