AP Gov SCOTUS Cases

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/13

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

14 Terms

1
New cards

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Facts/Issues

  • Congress created a national bank

  • Several states passed laws to tax the national bank

Holding (decision)

  • Congress MAY establish a national bank 

  • States may NOT tax the national government

Constitutional Principle

  • Necessary and Proper Clause (Article 1, Section 8) 

    • Congress has implied powers and is not limited by its expressed powers

  • Supremacy Clause (Article 6)

    • National government is superior to state governments when the two conflict

2
New cards

U.S. v. Lopez (1995)

Facts/Issues

  • A student in Texas brought an unloaded gun to school and was charged with violating the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990

Holding (decision)

  • The law is unconstitutional because possession of a gun in a school zone does not substantially affect interstate commerce

Constitutional Principle

  • Commerce Clause (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3)  

    • Does not grant power in a federal system

  • Tenth Amendment 

    • Protects state power in a federal system 

3
New cards

Baker v. Carr (1962)

Facts/Issues

  • Tennesee residents alleged that apportionment didn’t take into account population shifts, one person’s vote wasn’t necessarily equal to another person’s vote

Holding (decision)

  • Apportionment claims are justiciable in federal court 

  • Led to “one person, one vote” principle

Constitutional Principle

  • Under the equal protection clause the appellants had a right to challenge unequal apportionment

4
New cards

Shaw v. Reno (1993)

Facts/Issues

  • North Carolina created a very bizarrely shaped majority-minority district for the purpose of increasing black representation in Congress

Holding (decision)

  • Congressional districts cannot be drawn based only on race

  • Upheld rights of the majority

Constitutional Principle

  • Drawing a congressional district based only on race violated the equal protection clause and opposes the colorblind ideal of the Constitution

5
New cards

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Facts/Issues

  • William M. petitioned the Supreme Court to compel Secretary of State James M. to deliver his commission 

Holding (decision)

  • The Judiciary Act of 1789 conflicted with the Constitution and was therefore null and void

  • Impact: established judicial review, the power to declare a law unconstitutional

Constitutional Principle

  • Congress can’t pass legislation that conflicts with the Constitution because the Supremacy Clause places the Constitution above laws

6
New cards

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

Facts/Issues

  • Public schools in New York began school days by inviting students to recite a nondenominational prayer each morning 

  • Issue: does reciting a nondenominational prayer in public schools violate the First Amendment’s establishment clause

Holding (decision)

  • States cannot hold prayers in public schools, even if participation is voluntary and the prayer isn’t tied to a specific religion

Constitutional Principle

  • Public school sponsorship of religious activities violates the First Amendment’s establishment clause (freedom of religion)

7
New cards

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

Facts/Issues

  • For religious reasons, Amish families refused to send their children to high school, violating a Wisconsin law

Holding (decision)

  • Compelling Amish students to attend public school beyond 8th grade violates the free exercise clause 

Constitutional Principle

  • Individuals’ interest in free exercise of religion outweighs the state’s interest in compelling school attendance beyond 8th grade

8
New cards

Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

Facts/Issues

  • Students were suspended for wearing black armbands as a symbol to protest the Vietnam War

Holding (decision)

  • The armbands represent pure speech and students have free speech rights at school

Constitutional Principle

  • First Amendment freedom of speech

9
New cards

Schenck v. US (1919)

Facts/Issues

  • A war protester was arrested for distributing leaflets opposing the military draft in violation of the Espionage Act

Holding (decision)

  • The Espionage Act did not violate the First Amendment and was an appropriate exercise of Congress’ wartime authority 

  • Free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theatre and creating a panic (presents a clear and present danger)

Constitutional Principle

  • There may be time, place, and manner restrictions on the First Amendment’s free speech guarantee

10
New cards

New York Times v. US (1971)

Facts/Issues

  • The Nixon administration attempted to stop the publication of the Pentagon Papers 

Holding (decision)

  • The government did not have the right to block publication of the Pentagon Papers 

  • This case is viewed as a huge victory for freedom of the press

Constitutional Principle

  • Because of the First Amendment’s freedom of press, there is a heavy presumption against prior restraint

11
New cards

McDonald v. Chicago (2010)

Facts/Issues

  • The city of Chicago denied all licenses for handguns, effectively banning them

Holding (decision)

  • The 2nd Amendment’s right to bear arms for the purpose of self-defense applies to the states, striking down the Chicago policy

Constitutional Principle

  • Incorporates the 2nd Amendment’s individual right to bear arms through the 14th Amendment’s due process clause

12
New cards

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

Facts/Issues

  • A Florida man was charged with a felony and requested that the state appoint an attorney for him. The state of Florida denied the request

Holding (decision)

  • States must provide attorneys for defendants who can’t afford one

Constitutional Principle

  • Incorporated the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of the right to counsel, applying it to defendants in state court

13
New cards

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

Facts/Issues

  • Black students in several states were denied admittance to certain public schools based on race 

Holding (decision)

  • Unanimously ruled of public schools allowed by “separate but equal” principle of Plessy v. Ferguson in unconstitutional 

Constitutional Principle

  • Racially segregated public schools violate the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment 

14
New cards

Citizens United v. F.E.C. (2010)

Facts/Issues

  • A law (BCRA) banned corporations and unions from making political ads within 60 days of a general election or 30 days of a primary election

Holding (decision)

  • Corporations, unions, and interest groups can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money for independent political expenditures

Constitutional Principle

  • Based on the First Amendment’s free speech clause, corporations, unions, and associations have the right to engage in political speech