1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
sampling distribution of s
distribution of s is skewed, in larger N, it will look more normal and vary less from σ; in smaller N, it will look less normal, vary more from σ

when we don’t know σ. why can’t you find SE of the (normal) sampling distribution of means using SE = s/√N
when sample size is small, the distribution will have fatter tail —> a larger proportion of sample means would be counted as extreme values than we expect
more likely to make Type I error (false rejection)

william gosset
worked at Guinness Brewing Company, did small-sample experiments in which he changed the ingredients in the beer recipe
published papers under the pseudonym “student” to avoid angering his employer
most famoous for discovering the t-distribution which accounts for the added uncertainty due to sampling variation in s
how does the t-distribution account for added uncertainty due to sampling variation in s
adds an extra parameter: df, number of data points that can freely vary after accounting for estimated values
larger df: thinner tails, more similar to normal distribution
smaller df: fatter tails, less similar to normal distribution
fatter tails —> we need to move more SE away from the mean to include 95% of the dsitribution in the center

calculate the t-statistic (one sample t-test)
t = (x̄-μ₀)/sx̄
where sx̄ = s/√N
df = N - 1
assumptions of a t-test
the sampling distribution follows a normal distribution
the observations are independent
there are no outliers (influential data points not from our population, we have reason to believe they’re from a different population- not just because they stand out)
sampling was random
numerical and normality checks
skewness and kurtosis (both = 0 in norm dist)
Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test, Shapiro-Wilk test
Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test, Shapiro-Wilk test
hypothesis tests of whether sample distribution is significantly different from a (population) normal distribution (null hypothesis = normality)
sensitive to N, tend to always reject if N is big
graphical normality checks
histograms/density plots
quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots
Q-Q plot
x-axis: theoretical quantiles of the normal distribution
y-axis: quantiles of the data
if normal, points should fall in a straight line

confidence interval
interval estimate
range for which any random sample from the population will contain μ with probability 1 - α
calculate confidence interval
x̄ ± critical value*sx̄
find the critical values: the values on the distribution such that 2.5% is in the left and right tail for α = .05
turn the critical values onto the scale of the original variable with sample mean and SE

paired samples t-test
t-test that builds in a dependence structure:
variable measured at two points in time for the same N persons
variable measured for pairs of subjects (younger/older siblings, husband/wife pairs)
take the difference score (D) for each pair of observations
nil hypothesis
setting a null hypothesis to a difference of zero
a way to determine test for differences in general
paired t-test statistic
tD = (D - μ₀)/(sD/√N) with df = N - 1
N is the number of pairs
average difference divided by SE of difference scores (μ₀ often 0)
independent groups
testing whether two independently sampled groups have the same population mean
randomized experiments where different groups get different treatments
difference in pre-existing groups
independent samples t-test assumptions
normality of sampling distributions, independence of observations, no outliers, random sampling PLUS
homogeneity of variance: even if the populations have different means, they have the same SD around those means
pooled variance
to get the best estimate of the shared population variance, we need to pool them
weighted average of the two sample variance

independent samples t statistic
tx̄1-x̄2 = (x̄1 - x̄2)/(sx̄1-x̄2)
sx̄1-x̄2 = pooled standard error = sp*√(1/n1 + 1/n2)
df = n1 +n2 - 2
Welch-Satterthwaite correction
same test statistic as before, but the SE doesn’t pool variances (sx̄1-x̄2 = √((s21/n1) + (s22/n2)) and modifies the degrees of freedom to make them smaller than (n1+n2-2)
default in R, helps if homogeneity of variance doesn’t hold