1/32
Goffman - Interaction Rituals, Hochschild - Mangaged Heart, Collins' Interaction Ritual Theory, Agency-Structure Debate (Giddens vs. Bourdieu)
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Arlie Russel Hochschild
The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling (1983)
emotional labor falls on workers, especially in service-oriented professions
fusion of Marx & Goffman
case studies:
flight attendants: cheerful & accommodating
bill collectors: stern & authoritative
surface acting vs. deep acting
consequences of emotional labor
emotional alienation
commercialization of human feeling
emotional labor (Hochschild)
the process by which workers manage and regulate their emotions to align with organizational expectations or to fulfill the emotional requirements of a job.
service-oriented professions
selling emotional experiences
case study - flight attendants (Hochschild)
expectation: maintain a cheerful and accommodating demeanor to enhance passenger experience
training: instruction on suppressing negative emotions and exhibiting friendliness, regardless of personal feelings
case study - bill collectors (Hochschild)
expectation: adopt a stern and authoritative presence to prompt debt repayment
training: guidance on suppressing empathy to maintain a firm stance with debtors
surface acting (Hochschild)
altering external expressions without changing internal feelings; essentially “faking” the required emotions
implication: can lead to emotional dissonance and stress due to disparity between felt and displayed
front stage =/= backstage
deep acting (Hochschild)
attempting to modify internal feelings to genuinely align with expected emotions
implication: may reduce emotional dissonance but can blur the line between authentic and managed feelings
method acting; front stage = backstage
consequences of emotional labor (Hochschild)
emotional exhaustion and burnout
emotional alienation: potential loss of a sense of self due to continuous suppression or alteration of true emotions
disproportionate burden on women, as many roles requiring emotional labor are female-dominated
commercialization of human feeling
social situations as mini social systems (Goffman)
each social situation is like a mini social system with interdependent, functioning parts which strive for balance, order, and equilibrium among the selves involved in order to protect them.
why do we feel the need to protect the self? (Goffman)
avoiding embarrassment is important because we are tied together through emotions.
if embarrassed, risk falling out of character/off script —> deviating from script can crumple the social structure/expose it as fake.
mechanisms to create the self (Goffman)
social rituals in the form of conversations and interactions.
dependent on others for our sense of self.
interaction rituals (Goffman)
religion has become remote to the everyday aspects
Durkheim’s religious/social rituals do not happen on large scale
rituals still occur and are essential components of everyday interaction
the social self is the sacred symbolic object of most social rituals
worship one another and self identification
sense of self as a sacred object is reinforced through “worship”
macro-micro integration (Collins)
macro-reality is a product of micro-processes
macro-structures are social constructs
culture, social structure, statuses, roles, norms, classes all sociological illusions
macro-structures are not actors
macro-reality is a product of the “bundling” of micro-interactions
interaction ritual chains (Collins)
mechanism that creates macro-structures
components exchanged in everyday interaction:
cultural capital
emotional energy
everyday life is a “marketplace” for exchange of resources
rituals chained together in never-ending sequence
always seeking to gain emotional energy
cultural capital (Collins)
titles/positions, symbols, information, topics of conversations, ideas
recognize other people and start conversation
emotional energy (Collins)
feelings of group solidarity
mechanical solidarity for Durkheim
spark of connection when successfully exchange cultural capital
interaction rituals and emotional energy (Collins)
humans = emotional energy maximizers
imbalances in emotional energy exchange and losses of emotional energy create tension and social discontinuity
emotional energy is foundation of all social life
indicates successful membership in a group and a sense of belonging
formation of social classes, reproduce social hierarchy
conversations (symbolic interaction) are merely the “spark” that activates the “electrical current” of emotional energy exchange
cultural capital is our “ticket” into an interaction ritual where we acquire emotional energy
ingredients of rituals (Collins)
group presence, boundary to outsiders, common mood, common focus of attention —> create emotional energy —> stored in symbols
interaction rituals and macro-reality (Collins)
social structure, culture, norms, roles, etc. are emergent properties of social interaction because cultural capital and emotional energy exchanges stabilize overtime
individual interaction rituals cause changes in macro structures because individuals are always actively seeking to acquire more cultural capital, and thus, more emotional energy
high emotional energy levels produce… (Collins)
high levels of motivation
spontaneity
creativity
a sense of power
a sense of belonging
low emotional energy levels produce… (Collins)
low levels of motivation
depression
powerlessness
fatalism
alienation
superordination and emotional energy (Collins)
superordination (order giving) = emotional energy gain
if cultural capital allows one to give orders/have power, it can be used to increase emotional energy
subordination and emotional energy (Collins)
subordination (order taking) = emotional energy loss
if cultural capital puts one in a position where they take orders or are subject to power, it will cause decreased emotional energy
selecting interaction partners (Collins)
select interaction partners to exchange emotional energy with based on presumed cultural capital
maximize potential emotional energy exchange
stabilizes patterns of interaction, producing continuity in what appears to be social structure and culture
How do “macro-structures” change? (Collins)
new forms of cultural capital are introduced
new ritual technologies are developed
macro-society as a social network (Collins)
macro-society is like a vast social network charged with the electricity of emotional energy
emotional energy stars: tons of good, strong connections
sociological influences on Collins’ interaction ritual theory
Durkheim - rituals and emotional energy
Goffman - interaction rituals
Simmel - society as a marketplace of exchange
Mead/Blumer - society as symbolic interaction
phenomenology/ethnomethodology - emphasis on empirically observable processes
adopts the general network model
interaction ritual chains and dynamics of conflict and violence (Collins)
focuses on the patterns of face-to-face interactions
how certain social rituals can escalate into violent confrontations
sociological organization required for violence
direct violence relatively rare
direct violence is inefficient
agency-structure debate
structures: culture, social structure, social systems, economic structures exist, but where are the people as active agents?
Durkheim, Marx, Parsons
actors: micro-interactions exist as well as active agents, but where is the structure and culture?
Mead and Blumer
voluntarism vs determinism
agency
the active, spontaneous, and creative aspects of society
society as an ever-changing process
structure
ordered, patterned, and routinized aspects of society
society as an objective fact
agency-structure problem
How can a theory be developed which combines both agency and structure?
Anthony Giddens
Pierre Bourdieu
structuration (Giddens)
structure + action
dualities not dualisms
structure is what we do
free actor is always acting with and through social structure
social structures are expressed through the practices of agents, which in turn reproduces the structures which guided the practices
habitus (Bourdieu)
an embodied system of tastes, dispositions, ideas, and cultural capital
“structured structure” and “structuring structure”
internalized social structure and means by which social structure is created