1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
following American Rev.
broke
armed and trained army of dissatisfied middle class men
have experience fighting
European powers circling, waiting for America’s collapse
Articles of Confederation
too difficult for anything to happen
cannot collect taxes - national government too difficult to fund
each state gets one vote
Northwest Ordinance
outlined directions for new territory to be added as state
60,000 people settled + agree on border
outlawed slavery in new territories
Newburgh Conspiracy of 1783
all officers dissatisfied with congress
gather in Newburgh and invite Washington - present him with list of grievances
if not met will march on philly
Washington stops this
Shay’s Rebellion
Daniel shay - middle class farmer from mass.
hasn’t been paid from war and bank wants to take away his farm
a lot of farmers similar to him - join together and start going through mass burning court buildings with records of mortgages
gov cant put them down, mass has to do it themselves
elites get scared
cast doubt on efficiency of the articles - gov sees the need for a new robust constitution
clash over Constitution at Constitutional Convention - (Federalists v Anti-Federalists, etc.)
Federalists:
Hamilton and Adams
robust Constitution that can tax keep army, and keep order
Anti-Federalists:
Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and Madison
Agree that a stronger constitution is needed, but wants to keep power with states and individuals
clash over addition of Bill of Rights, Anti-Federalists would only sign if it was added
Federalists and Anti-Federalists are NOT political parties - political parties interpret an already written constitution
compromises made for constitution - (4)
“The great compromise”
house of rep - legislative branch of gov - based on population
senate - not based on population - more elitist
electoral college
“the 3/5 compromise”
a slave counts as 3/5 of a person
south insisted
fugitive slave laws
The Federalist Papers
John Jay and Hamilton
argued in defense of a strong central government
why electoral college was written
put in place to prevents the common man from making a stupid choice
“elasticity”
constitution written so it could be stretched and interpreted
“how much should it be stretched?” - immediate question
Democratic Republicans
created from anti-federalists
Jefferson and Madison
narrow interpretation
states rights and individual rights
Federalists
Hamilton, John Adams, Washington
broad interpretation
created gov to wield its power
can do things unless constitution prohibits it strictly
expand the government
Washington’s cabinent
surrounds himself with people - “cabinet” - expanding constitution
Hamilton’s economy
creation of a national bank - creates a line of credit
in order to get credit government levy's taxes
whiskey tax
effects farmers in Penn who use whiskey as currency
assuming state’s debts - each state owes money to Britain, putting the debt as a whole
Republicans HATE this
Whiskey Rebellion
1794 in Pennsylvania
in response to whiskey tax
“no taxation w/o representation”
Washington gathered federal force and put the rebellion down
Jay’s Treaty (reasons and outcomes)
John Jay
ambassador to England
Reason: goes to address two problems
Britain’s impressment of our sailors
Britain has forts on our soil that were never evacuated
supplying natives on our west with firearms
Outcome
Brit gives us back our soldiers but doesn't promise to stop
doesn’t do anything about forts
Republicans angry about treaty - don't like Jay or Federalists
Jay is against war with Britain
Washington’s farewell address
1) warned against a two party system - against political parties
2) also warned against US getting involved in foreign affairs
difficult to maintain, neither side wants us trading with the other
XYZ affair
result of US trying to speak with the French about interfering our trade with Brit
Federalists want to go to war with France following this affair