1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
calculus removal terminology
scaling → supragingival and subgingival removal of plaque, calculus, and stain
root planing → definitive treatment designed to remove cementum and/or surface dentin that is rough, impregnated with calculus, or contaminated with toxins or microorganisms
debridement → gross removal of plaque biofilm and calculus that interfere with the ability to perform a comprehensive oral evaluation
prophylaxis → removal of plaque biofilm, calculus, and stain
scaling and root planing (SRP)
done to resolve inflammation in periodontal soft tissues by removing irritants, removing supragingival and subgingival plaque and calculus
delays repopulation of subgingival pathogenic microflora and shift pocket environment from gram-negative to gram-positive
done during periodontal treatment every 3 months
sickle scalers
2 cutting edges, formed by face and two lateral surfaces, that converge to form the tip of te scaler
internal angles of approximately 70º, formed where lateral surfaces meet face at the cutting edge
for supragingival calculus removal
removal of gross depositis located just beneath gingival margin
small curved sickle scalers can go subgingivally (up to several mm)
anterior sickle scaler (SH5/339E2)
straight shank with two cutting edges and pointed tip
Jacquette 33 → straight blade for broad F/L surfaces; can be used interproximally
H5 → curved blade for interproximal deposits
terminal shank is parallel to long axis of tooth
placement at midline and scaling into interproximal area
roll instrument and scale to half the interpximal surfaces; the other half is done on the other B/L side
posterior sickle scaler (S204S9E2 and SN1359E2)
contra-angle shank with 2 cutting edges and pointed tip
terminal shank is parallel to long axis of tooth
distal → placement at distal line angle (tip pointing distally); scale into distal interproximal areas
mesial → placement at distal line angle (tip pointing mesially); scale into mesial interproximal areas
check the correct working end by placing instrument interproximally; the handle should be going out of the mouth
curettes
two cutting edges that converge into a round toe
no sharp points or corners othe rthan the cutting edges of the blade
can be adapted and provide good access to deep pockets with minimal soft tissue trauma
two types → universal and area-specific
universal curette (Columbia 13/14)
universal instrument to be used on anterior and posterior teeth for supragingival and subgingival calculus removal
face of the instrument is at 90º angle to terminal shank with rounded toe and rounded back
two parallel cutting edges:
primary cutting edge → farthest from handle
secondary cutting edge → closest to handle
anterior teeth → only primary cutting edge used
one end for surfaces away; the other end for surfaces towards
handle of instrument is parallel to long axis of the tooth
posterior teeth → primary and secondary cutting edges used
primary CE from D line angle to M (B, L, M surfaces)
combinaton of vertical, oblique, horizontal strokes
secondary CE rom D line angle to D (D surfaces only)
vertical strokes to go into distal interproximal surface
terminal shank is parallel to long axis of the tooth
area-specific curettes (Gracey curettes)
face of the blade is at a 60-70º angulation with the shank (offset) so cutting edge is curved to allow curette insertion into deep periodontal pockets without traumatizing soft tissue
only one cutting edge is used (lower cutting edge)
to find correct cutting edge, hold the terminal shank perpendicular to the floor
adapt the terminal shank so that it is parallel to the long axis of the tooth
Gracey 1/2
straight shank used on anterior teeth
insert the blade at midfacial surface, with strokes directed around the facial surface onto the mesial proximal surface of all anteriors in the quadrant
flip curette over and do the midfacial and distal proximal surfaces
Gracey 11/12
contra-angle long shank used on mesial of posterior teeth
insert curette subgingivally at DB line angle on the buccal shank, with terminal shank parallel to long axis of the tooth, and use vertical strokes to scale half-way onto mesial interproximal surface
toe faces towards mesial and interproximal
Gracey 13/14
contra-angle shank used on distal surfaces of posterior teeth
insert curette subgingivally at DB line angle on buccal surface, with terminal shank parallel to long axis of tooth, and use vertical strokes to scale half-way onto distal interproximal surface
toe faces towards distal and interproximal
other Gracey curettes
Gracey 15/16 → modification of 11/12 that consists of 11/12 blade combined with more acutely angled 13/14 shank
allows better adaptation to posterior mesial surfaces from a fron position with intraoral rests
Gracey 17/18 → modification of 13/14 that consists of elongated terminal shank by 3mm and a more accentuated angulation of shank
provides better access to all posterior distal surfaces
blade is 1mm shorter to allow better adaptation of blade to distal surfaces
types of Gracey shanks
finsihing → standard
rigid → larger, stronger, and less flexible shank to allow removal of moderate to heavy calculus without using seaparate set of heavy scalers
reduced tactile sensitivity
extended-shank curettes
after five curettes
modification of standard Gracey curette design
terminal shank is 3mm longer to allow extension into deeper periodontal pockets of 5mm or more
thinned blade for smoother subgingival insertion and reduced tissue distension
mini-bladed curettes
mini five curettes
modifications of after five curettes
blades are half the length of the after five or standard Gracey curettes
allows easier insertion and adaption in deep narrow pockets, furcations, developmental grooves, line angles, and deep tight F/L pockets
scale pocket as much with regular scaler because it has a much larger surface area and can take away more debris
file, chisel, and hoe scalers
used to remove tenacious subgingival calculus and altered cementum
use is limited, compared with that of curettes