Chapters on Attraction, Prosocial Behavior, and Aggression

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/65

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

66 Terms

1
New cards

Propinquity Effect

Tendency to form relationships with people we encounter often.

2
New cards

Mere Exposure Effect

Repeated exposure increases liking (not just for people).

3
New cards

Physical Attractiveness

Big influence on initial attraction and somewhat on long-term relationships.

4
New cards

"What is Beautiful is Good" Stereotype

Assumption that attractive people have other positive traits; some cultural differences.

5
New cards

Similarity

Shared interests/values increase attraction more than "opposites attract."

6
New cards

Reciprocity

We like people who like us back.

7
New cards

Attachment Styles

Different patterns of attachment in relationships.

8
New cards

Secure Attachment

Trusting, comfortable with closeness.

9
New cards

Anxious Attachment

Fear of abandonment.

10
New cards

Avoidant Attachment

Discomfort with closeness.

11
New cards

Evolutionary Perspectives

Men value youth/appearance, women value resources.

12
New cards

Destructive/Constructive Behaviors

How people respond to relationship problems (active/passive vs. constructive/destructive actions).

13
New cards

Cultural Differences

Passionate love is more valued in individualistic cultures; collectivist cultures may prioritize family/community.

14
New cards

Social Exchange Theory

We weigh costs and benefits in relationships; stay if benefits outweigh costs.

15
New cards

Equity Theory

We seek fairness in relationships.

16
New cards

Over-benefited

Getting more than giving.

17
New cards

Under-benefited

Giving more than getting.

18
New cards

Short-term vs. Long-term Studies

Long-term harder to conduct (attrition, complexity).

19
New cards

Passionate Love

Intense longing.

20
New cards

Companionate Love

Deep affection and care.

21
New cards

Prosocial Behavior

Any helping behavior.

22
New cards

Altruism

Helping without expecting anything in return.

23
New cards

Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis

Empathy prompts true altruistic behavior (but empathy can be limited).

24
New cards

Bystander Effect

More people = less likely to help.

25
New cards

Diffusion of Responsibility

Everyone assumes someone else will act.

26
New cards

Pluralistic Ignorance

Relying on others to define the situation (no one acts = no emergency).

27
New cards

Good Samaritan Study

Darley & Batson (1973) - Seminarians helped less when in a hurry.

28
New cards

Cultural Influences

Collectivist cultures may help in-group more; individualists more likely to help strangers.

29
New cards

Kin Selection

More likely to help relatives, especially in emergencies.

30
New cards

Mood Effects

Good mood = more helping; Bad mood (guilt) can also lead to helping.

31
New cards

Social Exchange Theory (Helping)

Help if rewards outweigh costs.

32
New cards

Overjustification Effect

Rewards can undermine intrinsic motivation.

33
New cards

Altruistic Personality

Personality matters but situation is more powerful.

34
New cards

Hostile Aggression

Inflicting harm for its own sake.

35
New cards

Instrumental Aggression

Harm as a means to another goal.

36
New cards

Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis

Frustration increases aggression likelihood (especially when goal is close, unexpected).

37
New cards

Social Learning Theory

Aggression learned through imitation (e.g., Bandura's Bobo Doll study).

38
New cards

Media Violence Effects

Leyens et al. (1975, 1977) - violent media increases aggression.

39
New cards

Desensitization

Less emotional reaction to violence over time.

40
New cards

Culture of Honor

Some cultures (e.g., Southern U.S.) endorse violence to protect reputation.

41
New cards

Gender Differences

Men: More physical aggression; Women: More relational aggression (social exclusion, gossip).

42
New cards

Biological Bases

Hormones and brain structures influence aggression (but not memorization-heavy).

43
New cards

Catharsis Hypothesis

Venting anger does not reduce aggression.

44
New cards

Deterring Aggression

Punishment must be prompt, certain, and fair to work.

45
New cards

Cognitive Dissonance

If you hurt someone, you might rationalize it to reduce discomfort.

46
New cards

Components of Prejudice

Cognitive: Stereotypes; Affective: Prejudice (feelings); Behavioral: Discrimination (actions).

47
New cards

Out-Group Homogeneity Effect

Seeing out-group members as 'all the same.'

48
New cards

Ultimate Attribution Error

Negative behavior by out-group explained by internal traits (different from fundamental attribution error which applies more generally).

49
New cards

Stereotype Threat

Fear of confirming stereotypes can worsen performance.

50
New cards

Steele & Aronson (1995)

Black and white college students took a difficult test. When race was emphasized (told the test measured intelligence), Black students performed worse, showing that anxiety from stereotype threat can harm performance.

51
New cards

Justification-Suppression Model

Prejudices are hidden until 'justifications' are available.

52
New cards

Social Categorization

Natural tendency to sort people; leads to in-group bias and out-group discrimination.

53
New cards

Jane Elliot's Experiment

'Blue Eyes/Brown Eyes' classroom exercise showed rapid creation of prejudice.

54
New cards

Clarks' Doll Study

Black children preferred white dolls, reflecting internalized racism.

55
New cards

Changing Prejudice

Logical arguments alone often fail; emotional appeals, shared goals, intergroup contact more effective.

56
New cards

Reducing Prejudice

Contact must meet conditions (equal status, cooperation, support of authority) to reduce prejudice.

57
New cards

Festinger, Schachter, & Back (1950)

Researchers studied friendships in a housing complex at MIT, finding that people were more likely to become friends with neighbors who lived closer to them.

58
New cards

Hatfield et al. (1966)

Randomly paired college students for a dance; participants' desire for a second date was based mostly on their partner's physical attractiveness.

59
New cards

Darley & Batson (1973)

Seminary students were asked to give a talk and were told they were either early, on time, or late; those who thought they were late were much less likely to help a person in need.

60
New cards

Burnstein et al. (1994)

Participants indicated who they would help in hypothetical life-or-death situations; people were more likely to help close genetic relatives.

61
New cards

Phone Booth Dime Study (Isen & Levin, 1972)

Researchers left dimes in public phone booths; those who found a dime were more likely to help a stranger.

62
New cards

Leyens et al. (1975, 1977)

Belgian teenage boys watched either violent or non-violent films; those who watched violent films showed higher levels of aggression afterward.

63
New cards

Bandura (1961)

Children watched an adult either aggressively beat up or ignore a Bobo doll; kids who saw the aggressive model were more likely to imitate the aggression.

64
New cards

Steele & Aronson (1995)

Study showing that anxiety from stereotype threat can harm performance.

65
New cards

Jane Elliott's Classroom Experiment

Teacher Jane Elliott divided her third-grade class by eye color, showing how easily prejudice can be taught.

66
New cards

Clarks' Doll Experiment (1947)

Black children were shown black and white dolls and asked which they preferred; many chose the white dolls, indicating internalized racism.