futher

rawlsian theory of justice

focus on fairness and equality as the foundations of justice

linkes to our viel of ifnorance

1. equal rights

2. difference principele

englightenment theory

• limtied government interventions

• difference principle is unjust unless it rectifies past injustices

• justice lies in the process not the outcome

ethics of care

• focus on relationships and human existance

• importance of caregiving roles whihc are often undervalued in traditonal ethics

• not all indivisuals have the same moral reqsoning

• crituqe of deonotlogy and utilitarianism

stakeholder thoeyr

stakeholder salience- the degree to which manaers prioritise competing stakeholder claims

• power

• legitimacy

• urgancy

implications for management include- prioritisation, practical application and ethical considerations

normative v instrumental views of stakeholder thoery

normative- compsnies moral obligation

instrumental- it can help acheive busiess success

galbrrath

stratrgic approaches to csr

• reactive= respose to external pressrue

• defensive- not to harm their reputaiton

• aesthetic- enhances thier image

• proactive- lt deep comitment

matten and moon globalised csr

its part of formulised practices- codes reports

mncs responsibilty links to their involvement in capitalism

explicit csr eg us activities are intergrated into corporate stratefgies eg formal reporting

implicit not explicitly ackniwlaged or articulated eg paying fair wages or tax

visser csr in developing countries

• institutional economic social and environmental issues

• coprs take greater responsibilty due to lack from the stake

• more philanthropic rather then strategic

• global v local

corporate colonialism

oli mncs engage in csr in developing nations, but doesnt offer significant development benefts

lack of intergration a corporate interest over local needs

capitalism

• passive revolution- socl change occurs not thorugh mass movement but rather dominante classes reshaping societies

• passive incremental changes- eg csr wont solve deeper inherent issues

bentham

nonsense on stitlts is natural rights no universla application no basis on realisty and could lead to social unrest

maclytnre

no self evideent truths- lacks justification or evidence like beleiving in witches or unicorns abandons enlightement which is the core to ethical frameworks, context matters

deontology

kant relates to the duty to others

looks at the inheret morality of actions rather then their consequences

kant

formed from the enligtment

1. ul there is one ci to act according to a maxim to which you want it to be a universal law

ml

1. nature- CI

2. ends not means

3. kingdom of ends- where all indivisals act according to the moral laws

geneology

nitsche geneology of morality- the origins of ethics, shaped by social cultural and political factors, not all beleive the same - feinist ethics

exitentilist ethics

indivisal freedom and euthenticity, not born with a predifined purpose or ethics we create this thorugh actions and choices

un guidelines for consunmer protection

consumers should have the right of acces to non hazardous products and right to promote equitable sustianable economic and social development and enviornmental protection

kornbergs syntesis

the brand called u enabled identity creation

pulido

in order to be the person we would like to be we must act

activism creates a culure of truth and practice truth