1/153
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Ancestral traits
Features primates share with other placental mammals
Ancestral traits: mammary glands
Produce milk to nourish young
Ancestral traits: homeothermy
Fur for insulation, sweat glands
Ancestral traits: heterodonty
Incisors, canines, premolars, molars
Other ancestral traits
Expansion of the neocortex
Placenta, long gestation followed by live birth
Maternal care of their young
Derived homologies/traits: petrosal bulla
The one trait that characterizes all primates, to the exclusion of all other mammals
Bony shell that encloses and protects part of the middle ear, and separates it from the interior of the skull
Derived homologies/traits: grasping hands and feet
Primates have evolved a high degree of grasping ability in the hand and foot
Grasping ability: opposable thumbs and “big” toe
Primates have 5 digits in their hands and feet (ANCESTRAL HOMOLOGY)
Opposable thumb: thumb can rotate so that the terminal pad of the thumb comes into contact with the terminal pad of one or more of the other digits
Opposable big toe: all primates have a big toe that is splayed laterally, away from the other four toes, but humans are the exception
Allowed ancestral primates a steady anchor while reaching out to catch an insect
Grasping ability: nails instead of claws
Seen in all primates except some NW monkeys
Allows for more dexterity in grasping
Grasping ability: sensitive tactile pads
Skin ridges on the tips of the digits
Act to reduce slippage on arboreal supports
Derived homologies/traits: reduced reliance on olfaction (smell)
Smell—or olfaction—plays a critical role in detection of predators or prey; however, smell is relatively less important in the trees
Shared derived trait
Particularly in haplorhines
Reduced reliance on olfaction (smell): olfactory regions of the brain are reduced
Olfactory bulb: responsible for the perception of odors/smells - reduced in size in primates
Haplorhine primates have a significantly higher percentage of pseudogenes among the olfactory receptor gene family than do other mammals
Olfactory pseudogenes: genetic basis for some of this reduction in olfaction in primates
Reduced reliance on olfaction (smell): nasal structures of the skull are reduced
Nasal structures of the skull are reduced in size
General shortening of the snout
Reduced reliance on olfaction (smell): haplorhines lack a moist naked rhinarium area surrounding the nostrils
The rhinarium is very useful to animals with a good sense of smell because it acts as a wind direction detector
Lost in haplorhine primates
Derived homologies/traits: enhanced visual sense
Stereoscopic vision and enhanced depth perception
Increased reliance on vision
Haplorhines have evolved trichromatic color vision
Stereoscopic vision
All primates can see in three dimensions
Primate eyes lie in the front of the face
Binocular vision (overlapping fields of view)
Binocular vision is not the same as stereoscopic vision (allows for depth perception)
In primates, each half of the brain takes in and processes information from the entire visual world on opposite side - not just the opposite eyeball
Enhanced depth perception
Color vision
Monochromatic vision: black and white
Dichromatic vision: only blues and greens
Trichromatic vision: blues, greens, and reds
Rods: differences in light intensity, black, white, grey
Cones: contain pigments (opsins)
Most mammals have only two opsins - dichromatic
See ripe fruits
Postorbital bar
Primates have forward-facing eyes with an enclosed bony orbit (postorbital bar)
Postorbital bar: supports the eye on the side
Postorbital plate: behind the eye
Diurnal
Day active
Derived homologies/traits: large brain
Large brain relative to body size
Expanded neocortex
Derived homologies/traits: prolonged life history, single offspring
Give birth to single offspring, with some exceptions and invest heavily in them
Longer gestation
Longer infancy and juvenile periods, and delayed reproductive maturation
Long lifespan
Primates are social
Learn from group mates: one reason for that long childhood
Maintain close social bonds
Carnivores teeth
High-pointed cusps for tearing meat
Many herbivores teeth
Broad flat surfaces on cheek teeth for chewing tough grasses and plant materials
Primate teeth
Low, rounded cusps; generalized dentition that allows them to process most types of food
Generalized features of the primate dentition (i.e., features shared with other mammals)
Teeth in the upper and lower jaw
Bilaterally symmetric
Heterodont dentition (incisors, canines, premolars and molars)
Catarrhine teeth
2.1.2.3
2 incisors: cut food
1 canine tooth: tear food, also behavioral functions
2 premolars and 3 molars: crushing and grinding
Types of teeth
Anterior teeth: ingestion
2 incisors and 1 canine
Posterior teeth: chewing
Premolars and molars
Insectivory
Insect-eating
Sharp crests for puncturing the outer skeleton of insects
Folivory
Leaf-eating
Well-developed shearing crests for cutting tough leafy material into small pieces
Folivore-frugivore
Frugivory
Fruit-eating
Low cusps for crushing soft fruits
Suborder Strepsirhini
Superfamily Lemuroidea
Lemurs, aye-aye, sifaka
Superfamily Lorisoidea
Lorises, galagos (bush babies)
Were the first modern group of primates to diverge from early ancestral primates
Suborder Haplorhini
Superfamily Tarsioidea
Tarsiers
Superfamily Ceboidea
Monkeys of Central and South America
Superfamily Cercopithecoidea
Monkeys of Africa and Eurasia
Superfamily Hominoidea
Gibbons, great apes, humans
Include catarrhines and platyrrhines
Cladogram
Every line but the bottom line is haplorhines
Ancestral mammalian traits of Strepsirhines
Sense of smell is well-developed
Retain the rhinarium
Lower jaw (mandible) is not fused
Eye has a tapetum lucidum
Most are nocturnal
Improves vision in low-light conditions, but at the expense of visual acuity (sharpness of vision, or ability to resolve fine details)
Strepsirhines derived traits
Grooming claw on 2nd digit of hind limb
Tooth comb
Together, the grooming claw and tooth comb appear to have evolved as a grooming package
Postorbital bar
Strepsirhini: Infraorder lorisiformes
Lorisoidea - Galagos & Lorises
Africa and Asia
Nocturnal
Varied diets (fruits, flowers, leaves, gums, insects, small mammals & birds)
Many show:
Solitary foraging
Infant parking
Many species give birth to either singletons or twins, and some species give birth twice per year
Strepsirhini, lorisiformes: Galagos
Bushbabies
Africa
Known for their leaping abilities – Vertical Clinging & Leaping
Solitary foragers
Strepsirhini, lorisiformes: loris, potto
Africa and Asia
Slow quadrupedal locomotion; reduced 2nd digits, strong, wide grasp
Strepsirhini, lemuroidea: lemurs
Madagascar
Extremely diverse, representing ~ 25% of all extant primate genera
Vertical clinging and leaping
Long powerful hind limbs
Long flexible back
Long fingers for grasping supports when they land
Strepsirhini, daubentonia: aye-aye
Diet specialized for wood-boring insect larvae
Except for thumb and big toe, all digits have claws; elongated and thin 3rd digit, functions like a skewer
Large continuously growing incisors
Prosimians
Strepsirhines + Tarsiers
Anthropoids
Monkeys and apes
Haplorhines: Tarsiers, Monkeys, Apes, Humans
Central and South America, Africa, Asia, and Europe
Derived traits of Anthropoids:
Most are diurnal
Lack the tapetum lucidum
Reduced olfaction, enhanced vision
Lack the rhinarium
Eyes more forward-facing
Full postorbital closure
Lower jaw is fused in most
Larger relative brain size
Longer developmental periods
Increased social complexity
Haplorhini, Tarsioidea - Tarsiers
SE Asia
‘Prosimian’ traits (i.e., strepsirhine-like):
Grooming claw
Unfused lower jaw
Nocturnal, Small social groups
Haplorhine traits:
Lack: tapetum lucidum, rhinarium, tooth comb
Other derived traits:
Adaptations for vertical clinging & leaping
Large eyes relative to body size, orbit anatomy
Nocturnal predators of small vertebrates
Quadrupedalism (Terrestrial or Arboreal)
Hind limbs and forelimbs of near equal length
Arboreal species have long tails to aid in balance on top of branches
Shoulder blade positioned to the side of the ribcage
Platyrrhines (‘flat-nosed’; Central/South America)
Broad nose, with outward-facing nostrils
Smaller body size
3 premolars in each quadrant (2.1.3.3)
All are arboreal
Some, but not all, have prehensile tail
Most have 2 color vision
Some have prehensile tail
Catarrhines (‘down-nose’; Africa/Asia)
Narrow nose, downward-facing nostrils
Larger body size
2 premolars in each quadrant (2.1.2.3)
Arboreal & terrestrial
None have prehensile tails
All have 3 color (trichromatic) vision
Ischial callosities
Haplorhini, Anthropoidea, Platyrrhini: Marmosets, Tamarins
Anthropoidea; C. & S. America
Callitrichidae: Marmosets, tamarins, Goeldi’s Monkey
Small bodied (< 1kg)
Omnivorous, insects & plant exudates
Variety of social grouping patterns:
Usually only one breeding female
Intense female-female competition, with suppressed ovulation in subordinate females
Twinning is common
Males are principal caregivers
Haplorhini, Anthropoidea, Platyrrhini: other monkeys, family cebidae
Diverse group; taxonomy debated
Insectivore-frugivores
Diverse social organization – monogamy (night monkeys) to multimale-multifemale
Capuchins: Tool use; large brains, slow life histories
Golden-faced saki: Dental specializations for eating hard nuts (seed predators)
Night monkey: The only nocturnal monkeys; Monogamy
Spider monkey: Prehensile tails; highly suspensory
Haplorhini, Anthropoidea, Catarrhini: Cercopithecoidea
Africa, Asia
Colobine monkeys
Dietary specialist on mature leaves
Arboreal quadrupeds; also adaptations for leaping
Cercopithecine monkeys
Arboreal & semiterrestrial species
Dietary omnivores
Cheek pouches
Sexual swelling (bright red butts)
Ischial callosities in all
Haplorhini, Anthropoidea, Catarrhini: Hominids
Apes and humans
Loss of the tail
Relatively large brains and enhanced cognition
Prolonged development
Postcranial adaptations for suspensory posture and locomotion
Hominids: Suspensory (incl. brachiation)
Short hindlimbs, elongated forelimbs
Mobile shoulder joint
Shoulder blade located on the back
Long and curved fingers for grasping branches
Hominids: Gibbons and Siamangs
Tropical forests of SE Asia
Smallest of the apes (“lesser apes”)
Diets focus on fruits
Socially monogamous
No sexual dimorphism
Brachiation
Hominids: Brachiation
Haplorhini, Hominoids: Great Apes
(Family Hominidae: Orangutans, Gorillas, Chimpanzees, Humans)
Borneo & Sumatra (Orangutans); Central & West Africa (Gorillas, Chimpanzees)
Large body size (‘Great Apes’)
Show suspensory adaptations, but are quadrupedal on the ground
Knuckle-walking
African great apes
Form of quadrupedalism practiced by great apes
Wrist joints are stabilized
Haplorhini, Hominoids, Great Apes: Orangutan
Genus Pongo
Male adult: ~80 kg
Female adult: ~36 kg
Highly frugivorous
Females are solitary, with dependent offspring
Haplorhini, Hominoids, Great Apes: Gorilla
Genus Gorilla
Male adult: 162-170 kg
Female adult: 71-95 kg
Folivore-frugivores
One-male & multimale groups with multifemale females and dependent offspring
Haplorhini, Hominoids, Great Apes: Chimpanzee & Bonobo
Genus Pan
Male adult, Chimps: 43-59 kg
Female adult: 34-46 kg
Diverse diet, mainly fruit; bonobos more folivorous
Multi-male, fission/fusion; female bonds important in bonobos
Tool use & hunting
Major threats
Nearly half of the world’s primate taxa are classified as Threatened, and in danger of going extinct
Habitat loss, fragmentation, modification
Hunting for bushmeat, pet trade
Disease
Political instability
Climate change
Primate diets
Primates obtain nutrients from many different sources
Carbohydrates from fruit and gums
Fats and oils from animal prey such as insects, also nuts and seeds
Protein from insect and animal prey, and young leaves
Leaves are also high in fiber, which can be difficult to digest
Most colobines eat leaves and have enlarged large intestines
Insectivores tend to be smaller in body size
Smaller animals have relatively higher energy requirements, and eat small amounts of high-quality foods
Folivores tend to be larger in body size
Can afford to eat large quantities of lower-quality foods
Diets influence ranging patterns
Leaves are more abundant in supply, and predictable in space and time
Fruits tend to be less predictable in supply, and patchily distributed in space and time
Folivores tend to have smaller home ranges than frugivores
Why do primates live in groups
Costs of sociality:
Greater competition for resources
Vulnerability to infectious disease
Two main benefits of sociality:
Enhanced access to resources
Reduced vulnerability to predation
Resource defense model
Primates live in groups because groups are more successful in defending access to resources than lone individuals
Joint defense of food resources is profitable when:
(1) food items are relatively valuable
(2) food sources are clumped in space and time
(3) there is enough food within defended patches to meet the needs of several individuals
Fruit often meets these three requirements
Thus, between-group competition over food resources favors group living
Problems of group living:
Benefits gained in between-group competition are offset by costs from within-group competition
RDM doesn’t explain why folivores live in large groups
Predator defense model
Group living evolved as a defense against predators
Terrestrial species tend to form larger groups than arboreal species
Solitary haplorhines (e.g., orangutans, spider monkeys) are large in body size and apparently face little danger from predators
Juveniles suffer higher mortality in smaller groups than in larger groups
Primates seem to adjust their behavior in response to the risk of predation (e.g., alarm calling)
Weaknesses of the model: predation is very difficult to observe, and it is, therefore, difficult to establish whether it is linked to group size
Reproductive asymmetry
Primate mothers are almost always the primary (if not exclusive) caretakers of offspring
The behavior of fathers is much more variable
Reproductive potential
The maximum number of offspring an individual can produce
Female productive potential is more limited
Male reproductive potential is very high
Reproductive asymmetry: female strategies
Females can improve likelihood of offspring’s survival in 2 ways:
Invest more care & energy into offspring - requires food and other resources
Be choosy about males fathering offspring only mate with quality males
Female strategies are heavily influenced by the distribution of food in environment
Female strategies: scramble competition
When resources cannot be easily monopolized
First-come, first-served basis
Resources are of low value, highly dispersed, or occur in large patches
Female strategies: contest competition
Occurs when access to a resource can be monopolized
Some individuals exclude others, and obtain more of the resources
Resources patches are clumped, of intermediate size and high value
Dominance
Often measured as direction of approach-retreat interactions, or the direction of submissive and aggressive behaviors
When there is contest competition, dominance rank may determine priority of access to preferred resources, increase reproductive success of high ranking individuals
Reproductive asymmetry: male strategies
High variance in reproductive success
Limited by access to females
Leads to competition among males for mates
Males can up reproductive success by the number of mates
They do this through ‘competition’ with other males to gain access to mates
All of nothing
Reproductive asymmetry strategies
Female reproductive success is limited primarily by access to important resources necessary for survival
Female strategies are primarily influenced by the distribution of food
Male reproductive success is limited primarily by the availability of mating opportunities
Male strategies are primarily influenced by the distribution of fertile females
Paleontology
The study of extinct organisms based on their fossilized remains
Fertile females: clumped
Monopolization of fertilizations possible
One male group
Fertile females: dispersed
Female dispersed or synchronous breeders
Difficult to guard and monopolize
Pair bonds, multiple groups
Appeal to nature fallacy
Just because something happens in nature doesn’t mean it’s desirable, ethical, or unavoidable
Observations of primate behavior are not valid justifications for reprehensible human behavior
Social organization
Female versus Male philopatry
In female philopatric groups, related females tend to have high degree of affiliation and territorial defense
Solitary
Pair living
Group Living
Single Male - Multi Female
Single Female - Multi Male
Multi Male - Multi Female
Mating system
Different from social organization
Monogamy
Polygyny: male has multiple female partners
Polyandry: female has multiple male partners
Polygynandry: both male and females have multiple partners
Solitary
Orangutan social structure strongly tied to erratic food supply
Females live with their offspring; males are solitary
Monogamous pairs
Little sexual selection
Males do not invest much energy in courtship or mating
Males invest heavily in their offspring and in maintaining long-term bonds with their mates
E.g. gibbons and platyrrhines
One-male, multifemale groups
Males compete actively to establish residence in groups of females
Resident males face constant pressure from nonresident bachelor males; threat of aggression
E.g. Hamadryas baboons
Multimale, multifemale groups
Larger groups of females; one single male cannot monopolize access to all of them
Male-male competition is mediated though dominance relationships
Male dominance rank is associated with reproductive success in many studies
Female preferences can influence male mating success
E.g. chimps
Sexual selection
A form of natural selection that occurs when individuals differ in their ability to compete with others for mates or to attract members of the opposite sex
Favors the evolution of traits that allow the limited sex (males in most species) to compete more effectively for access to the limiting sex (females)
Sexual selection: Darwin
Differences in reproductive success caused by competition over mates = sexual selection
Sexual selection: intersexual selection
Where individuals exert choice among individuals of the opposite sex for mating partners
Favors traits that make males (usually) more attractive to females
Favors traits that:
Provide direct benefits to their mates
Indicate good genes and thus increase the fitness of the offspring
Make males more conspicuous to females (although they can be maladaptive)
Sexual dimorphism
When males and females differ consistently in size or appearance
Greatest in one-male, multifemale (polygynous) social groups
E.g. gorrillas
Least in monogamous social groups
E.g. gibbons
Human sexual dimorphism
Humans have relatively low sexual dimorphism
Differences in average height of males and females have been explained in problematic ways
Recent research has offered an alternative explanation for sex differences in human height:
Estrogen in skeletal growth
Sexual selection: intrasexual selection
Competition among same-sex individuals for access to members of the opposite sex
Favors large body size, large canine teeth, and other traits that enhance competitive ability
Intrasexual selection: contest competition
Contest competition for mates - traits that improve fighting success
Body size sexual dimorphism and canine dimorphism
Intrasexual selection: sperm competition
In social systems where multiple males have access and male-male competition is high, sexual selection favors sperm competition
Increased sperm production (testes size)
Intrasexual selection: infanticide
Act of killing a dependent infant
One male groups most common
Outsider males overthrow the resident dominant male, and a new leader male is established
This may be followed by killing of unweaned infants by the new leader male
Human mate choice
Humans are sometimes socially monogamous (sometimes serial monogamy)
Many human societies have different mating systems (monogamous, polygynous, polyandrous…serial monogamy, etc)
Humans choose mates on the basis of many factors, but some of them may be rooted on our evolutionary past
Symmetry: honest indicator of the quality of someone’s genes
Honest signal: information increases the fitness of the receiver
Some evidence that humans select mates on the basis of odor cues, which indicate genetic diversity at important immune function loci
Major histocompatibility complex
Proteins that allow immune system to detect foreign invaders
Greater genetic diversity in MHC may allow for more robust immune response
Primates choose mates based on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) diversity
Rhesus macaques
Males that were heterozygous at a MHC locus sired significantly more offspring than homozygous males increased fitness
Pig-tailed macaques
Similarity in MHC antigens between mother and father predicts pregnancy loss
Behavior is shaped by natural selection
Violent gorillas that commit infanticide have more offspring than peaceful gorillas that don’t → offspring inherit disposition to violent behavior → infanticide can evolve
Dedicated marmosets that invest in parental care have more successful offspring that indifferent marmosets that don’t → stable bonds and male parental care will evolve
Human evolution didn’t stop in the Pleistocene
Humans continue to evolve
We are not “stuck in the past” any more than other species are
Evolutionary psychology
A field of study that investigates evolutionary origins of modern human behavior
Many of these studies don’t consider non-western people
Some people (academics and non-academics) have used studies of primate behavior to uphold harmful stereotypes applied to humans
Beware justifications of bad behavior based on so-called “human universals”