1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Give example for protecting infant industries
Eg. Massive subsidies given to Airbus by the EU government so it can compete with Boeing -> enabled it to create a full product line of aircraft and gain 50% share of large commercial aircraft sales
Protectionism protecting infant industries EVAL
Eval: Complacency
Remain internationally uncompetitive and inefficient -> CA will not materialise
Once protection is given, it is hard to remove
Vested interests are created and the industries would fight strongly against the removal of trade barriers
Might be politically damaging, especially if they receive political funding from firms or if the removal will cause S-UN
Given the dynamic and unpredictable nature of the world, it is difficult to accurately identify the industry with the potential CA
Protectionism protecting infant industries EVAL eg. + conclusion
Eg. Malaysia national automobile company, Proton was protected by massive subsidies -> supposed efficiencies never materialised
HENCE, government should constantly review the progress of the industry and implement protectionist measures for a specified time period
If the industry fails to make progress, the government can opt to abolish the policy
State protectionism protecting environment EVALS
International trade might not be the source of the problem
Limiting it via protectionism does not solve the problem at its root cause
Explain how protectionism causes anti-dumping
Anti-dumping duties can be imposed on heavily subsidised imports to bring their prices to be more in line with domestic prices
Describe benefits of anti-dumping
In the present, the foreign firms will lower prices below their own MCOP to steal market share (predatory prices)
Assuming that they have the same cost of production, domestic firms cannot match the lower prices and will shut down
Once they have obtained monopoly power in the future, these foreign firms will then raise prices back up to profit maximising levels -> domestic households would be adversely affected due to market dominance by foreign firms
HENCE, government can implement tariffs to prevent foreign firms from selling at a lower price and prevent domestic firms from shutting down
Producers: higher PS + reduce UN + higher mSOL
Describe costx of anti-dumping
CS falls
Producers might suffer from lower profits due to higher costs if the domestic tariffs were implemented on imported FOP required by the domestic firms -> AC/MC falls -> subnormal profits cause them to shut down -> employees face fall in wages or lose their jobs if firms shut down or reduce production
State benefits of protectionism
Economic growth |
Reduce S-UN |
Reduce income inequality |
To develop infant industries |
Correct trade deficit |
Protect environment |
Anti-dumping |
Describe costs of protectionism
Worsen BOT, -ve EG and higher UN |
|
Cost-push inflation |
|
State overall eval for effects of protectionism
Whether adverse effects can be better addressed via other policies
How much society values benefits of trade VS costs of trade