social psychology 330 exam 1

5.0(2)
studied byStudied by 189 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/50

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

51 Terms

1
New cards

false dichotomy

presenting only two options when there are more possibilities

2
New cards

falsification

one cannot prove a theory or hypothesis true. One can prove that X is false

3
New cards

single blind experiment

participants don’t know if they are in the experimental or control group

4
New cards

double-blind experiment

Neither participates nor person gathering data knows what groups the participants are in. reduces rearch bias

5
New cards

three areas of study in social psyc

social thinking, social infleunce, and social behavior

6
New cards

kurt lewin

founder of social psyc

7
New cards

lewinian equation

B=f(P,E) behavior is a function of the person and their environment

8
New cards

why are experiments so important in social psyc

social psyc relies on experimentation/ evidence

9
New cards

why is critical thinking important in social psyc

for the analysis of available facts, evidence, observation and arguments in order to come to a judgment by the application of rational, skeptical and unbiased analyses and evaluation// understanding

10
New cards

scientific method

observe, research, hypothesize, experiment, analyze and report

11
New cards

statistical significance

probability that observed results are not due to chance. P equal or lower than .05

12
New cards

reliablity

consistency

13
New cards

hypothesis

a testable prediction. it guides the direction of research

14
New cards

why is it important that constructs be operationalized

so that variables are specific enough to be measured

15
New cards

archival research

examining pervious data. usually not related to current study

16
New cards

naturalistic observation

observing people in natural environment. used to describe behavior

17
New cards

quasi experiment

Unlike a true experiment- there is no random assignment

18
New cards

true experiment

has independent and dependent variable with a control and treatment group

19
New cards

correlational designs

look for association between two or more variables. range from 1 to -1 (correlation does not equal causation)

20
New cards

independent variable

variable manipulated

21
New cards

dependent variable

variable measured to assess the effect of independent variable

22
New cards

random selection

selecting participates randomly from a population

23
New cards

random assignment

assigning participants to a group (control or experimental) randomly. increases internal validity

24
New cards

T test

used to compare two groups

25
New cards

ANOVAs (analysis of variance)

used to compare means across three or more groups

26
New cards

correlation coefficients

measures the strength and direction of a relationship between two variables

27
New cards

internal validity

the trustworthiness of a research design. likeliness the results are due to experimental manipulation (independent variable)

28
New cards

external validity

extent of results applying to “real world”

29
New cards

APA guidelines

informed consent- deception used as little as possible- right to withdrawal- debriefing

30
New cards

self-concept

what we know and believe about self

31
New cards

self- monitoring

extent to which people monitor self-presentation, expressive behavior and nonverbal affective display

32
New cards

high self-monitors

social chameleons

33
New cards

low self monitors

remain consistent across situations

34
New cards

self-compassion

orientation to care for oneself

35
New cards

self- awareness

recognition of ourselves being separate being

36
New cards

mark test

assess self-awareness. putting a mark on a baby face and having them look in a mirror- if the baby is self-aware, it will touch where the mark is on their face

37
New cards

W.I.D.E

WHO- we evaluate our abilities automatically by comparing ourselves to similar others. INTERPRETATION- how we interpret social comparisons influences our self-concept. DIRECTION- the direction of our social comparison influences our self-concept. ESTEEM- protecting our self-esteem influences our self-concept

38
New cards

upward comparison

comparing ourselves to others that are better. can give us a goal

39
New cards

downward comparison

comparing ourselves to others that are worse than us. can make us feel less bad about ourselves

40
New cards

social identity theory

self- concept is composed of two parts: a personal identity that is based on personal characteristics and a social identity that is based on social role characteristics

41
New cards

self- discrepancy theory

we have three selves that exist simultaneously. ideal self, actual self, and ought self. the more in line these are the better we feel about self

42
New cards

self- expansion theory

we include other people in our self-concepts. the motivation to grow and enhance self-concept can be achieved through interpersonal relationships

43
New cards

optimal margin theory

theory proposes a slight to moderate range of healthy distortions of reality improves psychological and physiological well-being

44
New cards

independent self-construal

self is seen as independent and uniqueness is good

45
New cards

interdependent self-construal

self is seen as connected to other and greater group membership is good

46
New cards

ingratiation

other enhancement or opinion conformity

47
New cards

self- promotion

self-enhancement and entitlement

48
New cards

conspicuous consumption

lavish spending or prominent display of high status items

49
New cards

three types of self-serving cognitive biases that people often display

1.our own traits. 2.our own behaviors. 3.feeback about the self

50
New cards

collective self-esteem

our evaluation of the worth of the social groups we are in

51
New cards

how can too much self-esteem be harmful

more reluctant to take intelligent risk. make fewer mistakes from which to learn. substitute competitive social comparisons for cooperative social supports. decrease academic performance. avoid helpful feedback. increased levels of intergroup prejudice. increase bullying and aggression towards others