Act of Faith
more than merely an act of belief; something to die for and something to live every moment
Apologetics
Greek, to give defense of
Aristotelian Logic
a logic of linguistic terms which express mental concepts with represent real essences, or the nature of things
Conservative
refers to something in time and history; not eternal truths, but opinions or ways o the past as against the future
Emotional Faith
feeling assurance or trust or confidence in a person, includes hope and peace
Faith (heart faith)
the absolute center o the soul, does not mean feeling or sentiment or emotion; it is the very self, the I, the subject
Intellectual Faith
the act of the intellect, prompted by the will, by which we believe everything God has revealed on the grounds of the authority of the One who revealed it
Judgement of Credibility
I may and can believe these truths proposed to me for my belief because God has revealed them
Liberal
heretics; those who dissent from essential doctrine and embrace a free way of thinking as opposed to keeping with tradition
Motive of Credibility
There is a God who can neither deceive nor be deceived
This God has revealed Himself to us in the OT and NT
Christ founded a Church which He endowed with infallibility
Object of Faith
all things believed
Objective Reason
NOT influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts
Process of Reasoning
comparing two concepts with a third on the principle that two things which are equal to the same thing are equal to each other
Progressive
opposed to conservative; ways of the future as against the past
Self-Evident Truths
truths that are in themselves so evident as to be clearly understood by all who have the use of reason
Sources of Knowledge
reasons for forming our judgments
Subjective Reason
influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts
Volitional Faith
commitment to obey God’s will, faithfulness, or fidelity; manifests itself in behavior, that is, in good works; it is a love deeper than a feeling
3 manifestations of human reason’s acts of the mind
understanding, judging, reasoning
3 classes of apologetics
Natural, Christian, Catholic
why is it necessary to restore the older, larger notion of reason itself?
seeing reason not as confined to reasoning and calculating but including apprehension, intellectual intuition, ‘seeing,’ insight, contemplations
one value of apologetics
the satisfaction of the intellect of an honest inquirer
in what form do we possess all our knowledge?
judgments
false judgment
not in union with reason
true judgment
in union with reason
certain judgment
no fear of error
uncertain judgment
fear of error
Human Faith
has the possibility of error
Divine Faith
cannot have error
motive of Divine Faith
authority of God
object of Divine Faith
faith
Ad Hominem Argument
uses personal attacks rather than logic
Strawman Argument
attacks a different subject rather than the topic being discussed - often a more extreme version of the counter argument; purpose is to make one’s position look stronger than it actually is
Ad Ignorantiam Argument
argues that a proposition must be true because it has not been proven false or there is no evidence against it
Black and White Fallacy
a false dilemma or false dichotomy presents limited options - typically by focusing on two extremes - when in fact more possibilities exist; “either you love me or you hate me”
Slippery Slope Fallacy
assumes that a certain course of action will necessarily lead to a chain of future events; takes a benign premise or starting point and suggests that it will lead to unlikely or ridiculous outcomes with no supporting evidence
Hasty Generalization
a claim base on a few examples rather than substantial proof; arguments often don’t hold up due to a lack of supporting evidence: the claim might be true in one case, but that doesn’t mean it’s always true
Red Herring Fallacy
an argument that uses confusion or distraction to shift attention away from a topic and toward a false conclusion
Begging the Question
“The accused will be given a fair trial before he is hanged.”
Ad Verecundiam
appeal to authority is the misuse of an authority’s opinion to support an argument; “Because Martin Sheen played the president on television, he’d probably make a great president in real life.”
Ad misericordiam
an appeal to pity relies on provoking your emotions to win an argument rather than actual evidence
Ad populum
the Bandwagon fallacy assumes something is true (or right or good) because others agree with it; in other words, it argues that if everyone thinks a certain way, then you should too
Non sequitar
the “it does not follow” fallacy