Defences & remedies in tort

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/25

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

26 Terms

1
New cards

Contributory negligence

  • Was originally a full defence but changed in 1945 by Law Reform - now it’s only a partial defence

  • Applied when C has contributed to their own harm as well as the D, therefore reducing damages

2
New cards

Sayers v Harlow

D contributed to injuries by standing on toilet roller to escape public toilet

3
New cards

Froom v Butcher

C lost 25% of damages because they weren’t wearing a seatbelt at the time of the car crash

4
New cards

Woods v Davidson

  • D negligently ran over C who was drunk & tried to use CN defence however this failed because the fact the C was drunk was irrelevant - they still would’ve been ran over if sober

5
New cards

Consent (volenti)

  • When the C voluntarily assumes the risk of harm

  • Full defence & if successful C will receive no damages unlike CN which is a partial defence

6
New cards

What 2 points must be met for consent?

  • C must have knowledge of the precise risk involved

  • C must consent to the risk freely - won’t succeed where C has no choice but to consent, must be voluntarily

7
New cards

Morris v Murray

  • C had been drinking with D & went for a flight in his plane which the D crashed & C died as a result of

  • D used consent defence as C had been aware of risk of getting into plane with drunken pilot

8
New cards

Smith v Baker

  • C had done all he could in complaining about risk of crane moving rocks above his head & had no choice but to continue to work - didn’t freely consent to risk

9
New cards

Consent in sport

  • Defence will succeed where injuries fall within the normal activities of the sport

  • Won’t succeed if injuries are result of conduct that falls outside normal activities of the sport

10
New cards

Simms v Leigh RFC

Rugby player injured when tackled & hit a wall however the tackle was within all rules of rugby so there was consent

11
New cards

Condon v Basi

Footballer liable for breaking player’s leg in foul tackle as there was no consent to foul play

12
New cards

What are damages?

  • Financial compensation rewarded for the C’s injury, loss or damage

  • Aim is to put the C back in the position they were in before their rights were breached

  • Amount is based on the extent of C’s loss or injury, not the degree of negligence or D’s ability to pay

13
New cards

White v Jones

A mistake in a will meant 2 daughters lost out on 9k so the courts awarded them it

14
New cards

What are special damages?

  • All of the C’s losses from the incident until the trial that are quantifiable

  • Eg property damage, loss of earnings, medical expenses

  • Only expenses considered reasonable by the court are recoverable as C has a duty to mitigate his loss

15
New cards

Harris v Brights Asphalt

C claimed the cost of private medical care even though he could’ve used NHS

16
New cards

Cunningham v Harrison

C said he needed a housekeeper & 2 nurses to live in his home to look after him however the courts denied as unreasonable

17
New cards

What are general damages?

  • All damages from the trial to the future that are aren’t necessarily quantifiable

  • 2 subheadings - pecuniary & non-pecuniary

18
New cards

What are pecuniary damages?

  • Future financial losses after the trial eg loss of earnings & costs of future health care/treatments

  • Calculated by using the multiplicand & multiplier system

19
New cards

What is the multiplicand?

Annual sum of the C’s annual loss of net earnings & any other expenses

20
New cards

What is the multiplier system?

  • An estimate of the number of years for which the C’s disability will last before recovery/death

  • Figure limited to about 16-18

21
New cards

What are non-pecuniary damages?

  • Non-financial losses that can’t be quantified eg pain, suffering & emotional distress

22
New cards

Where is the quantum of damages in personal injury contained?

Kemp & Kemp: Quantum of damages book

23
New cards

What are equitable remedies?

Remedies that operate when damages are an inadequate remedy of justice

24
New cards

What are injunctions?

Orders that put a stop to a tort eg private nuisance

25
New cards

What is a prohibitory injunction?

An order that stops D from carrying out a particular act eg stopping a neighbour from tresspassing on your land

26
New cards

What is a mandatory injunction?

  • An order that requires D to carry out a particular act eg requiring a neighbour to remove a fence

  • Can be perpetual (final) or interim (temporary)