1/28
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Lord coke
Defined murder- the unlawful killing of a reasonable person of being in being under the kings peace with malice afterthought
Re A (conjoined twins) 2000
Example of lawful killing
A-G reference (no.3 1994) 1997
Foetus is not a reasonable person in being
Vickers 1957
Intent to cause GBH is enough for mens Rea of murder
Asmelash 2013
Voluntary intoxication cannot form part of ds circumstances when considering a defence of loss of control
Lloyd 1967
For diminished responsibility ‘substantial impairment’ doesn’t mean total not trivial or minimal- something in between
Golds 2016
For diminished responsibility ‘substantial impairment’ must be more than trivial but not every case that is more than trivial will meet standard of substantial
Byrne 1960
Provides definition for abnormality of the mind
Dietschmann 2003
Intoxication and abnormality of mental functioning may constitute diminished responsibility (adjustment disorder)
Wood 2008
Alcohol dependency syndrome(ADS) can constitute an abnormality of mental functioning
Stewart 2009
Set out 3 stage test for ADS as a cause of abnormality
Dowds 2012
Voluntary intoxication alone cannot constitute diminished responsibility
Jewell 2014
D must have ‘lost it’ or ‘snapped’, acting out of character is not enough
Ward 2012
Fear of serious violence can be toward another, not necessarily d
Dawes 2013
Fear of serious violence is not viable where d instigated offence
Zebedee 2012
Qualifying trigger must a) constitute circumstances of extremely grave character and b) d must have a justifiable sense of being wronged
Hatter 2013
Breakdown of relationship not usually a qualifying trigger for loss of control
Bowyer 2013
A sense of being seriously wronged cannot exist where d initiated the offence
Clinton 2012
Sexual identity alone is not a trigger but can be considered where it forms an essential part of context where other triggers also exist
Lamb 1967
A complete criminal act must take place for unlawful act manslaughter to be proven
Lowe 1973
Omissions can’t constitute an act under unlawful act manslaughter
Larkin 1943
The unlawful act must be dangerous according to an objective test
Newbury and jones 1976
D must have mens Rea for unlawful act but doesn’t need to realise act is unlawful or dangerous
Broughton 2020
Restated the necessary tests involved in gross negligence manslaughter
Singh 1999
A duty of care can be contractual (boat)
Wacker 2002
A duty of care can be taken on voluntarily
Bateman 1925
Negligence alone is not enough, the negligence must be gross
Litchfield 1998
A duty of care can be contractual
Misra and another 2004
For the negligence it be gross, the jury must decide whether ds conduct was seriously negligent in relation to risk of death