1/67
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Trump quote on Kim Jong Un
'He wrote me beautiful letters and we fell in love'
Charles De Gaulle on whether France has friends
France doesn't have friends, it has interests
Dworkin on friendship
Equality and respect
Types of friendship
Avoiding war
Utility/contractual
Aspirational, diplomatic friendship
Aspirational friendship
Aristotle: shared values, mutual respect, good intentions for one another
3 types of thick friendship (Simpson)
1. Duellists
2. Merchants
3. Summiteers
Duellists (Simpson)
Schmitt: warfare, mutually respected sovereign equals
Duelling regulated through formal and informal rules
Policing kills duels
Merchants (Simpson)
1913, Norman Angell: states becoming so entwined in economic and trade relations that war almost impossible
Summiteers (Simpson)
Friendship and trust develops in interpersonal relations along diplomacy and law e.g., Reagan and Gorbachev
Enmity (Schmitt)
War as relation between states
Absolute enmity as moralising the enemy and turning 'it' into a criminal or monster, aim no longer peace treaties but annihilation
Simpson's 5 characters
1. Sovereign
2. Enemy
3. Criminal
4. Pirate
5. Neutrals
What has each of Simpson's 5 characters done?
Characters are both constitutive and disruptive, each has activated or provoked, or been brought to life by a legal infrastructure, a 'law of...', each undercuts or threatens the existence of the sovereign without qualities
Sovereign (Simpson)
IL thinking of itself as a study of sovereigns in the abstract, 'opaque, featureless, equals' - every state a 'most-favoured nation', field of 'sovereigns qua sovereign'
Schmitt on sovereigns
War as a relation among equally sovereign persons
1648 Peace of Westphalia
Concrete reality of sovereign territorial orders existing side by side in a particular space at a particular time, as a consequence of personalisation
UN Charter Articles 53 and 107
Enemy state = enemy of any signatory of Charter during WWII (Germany and Japan), still not removed
Enemy (Simpson)
Designated under jus ad bellum
Jus in bello organising relations among enemies when in conflict
Idea of a limited war
Shift to thinking of them as criminals
UN and enemies (Simpson)
UN as a coalition of friends at its origins with a smattering of official enemies (Germany and Japan) who have now become close friends of UN (disproportionate funding support)
Schmitt on IL and war
IL has followed politics has followed technology
IL permits only just was
No longer based on theological, moral or juridical norms but institutional and structural quality of political forms
Criminals (Simpson)
Those who failed to become friends, or were deprived of proto-friendship, were converted into criminals - lawful adversaries became prosecutors and judges - later 'the international community'
Pirate (Simpson)
Outside the law, enemy of humanity - will be treated neither as an enemy under the laws of war or as a criminal to be prosecuted in court
Lawless space e.g., GTMO
Schmitt on the pirate
Means not just the individual but its ship and the entire crew, everyone will be hanged and captured together, no pardon
Neutrals (character, Simpson)
Poised between friendship and enmity
More prevalent in the 18th century
Lorimer: 'an abnormal relation' - 'aberration' from normal relations of 'peace and amity' with occasional squabbles
Wight's 3 Rs
Realism
Rationalism
Revolutionism
Realism (Wight)
States as self interested, state-based, dominant position = anarchy, state of nature
Solution = give up sovereignty (Leviathan), utopian project in IL
Hobbes, Machiavelli
Rationalism (Wight)
Thin cooperation, thin friendship, contractual/transactional, thin laws
Legalism
Grotius
Revolutionism (Wight)
Currently system radically imperfect and unjust, either must change or it will change
Evolutionary revolutionists (Wight)
Moving towards historical conclusion, always a dialectical struggle followed by revolution, historicist reading, one reading of Marx - nothing we can do
1990s liberal idea of the end of history
Francis Fukuyuma
Everyone so integrated into liberal democratic post-industrial late-capitalist highly marketised globalised war -> war pointless -> friendly, liberal democracies
Kant on securing perpetual peace
Perpetual peace would be secured by a combination of trade and democracy + republicanism
Solve the Hobbesian dilemma through actual friendship between trading liberal democracies, not through war, Leviathan or legalised forms of friendship
Hégel end of history
A particular political, economic or social system may develop that would constitute the end-point of humanity's sociocultural evolution and final form of human government
Dialectical
Acting through opposing forces
Catastrophic revolutionists (Wight)
There will be a change, has to happen now, will be violent/revolutionary because the world is in such a terrible state
Lenin, Mao
Law of enmity (Simpson)
Pessimism that grounds IL in a law of enmity, at the heart of what IL thinks of itself as being about - organising relations among enemies and would-be enemies
Self-narrated success stories - enemies encouraged to become friends or neutrals
Simpson on collective security and law of enmity
Jus ad bellum - right to use force, attack by enemy state, when another state may befriend victim state (collective self-defence)
Collective security of UN Charter: existence of threat to peace, circumstances of unfriendliness
Schmitt on law of enmity
European 'war in form' as the 'strongest possible rationalisation and humanisation of war' -> belligerents had the same political character and same rights, both recognised each other as states
Enemy ceased to be someone 'who must be annihiliated' - peace treaty possible
Language of friendliness in IR
Alliances - friends and special relationships e.g., US and UK - not legal but think along these lines
Unfriendly or coldly associated persons need law to co-exist
Angela Merkel discovered CIA was bugging her phone, called it unfriendly -> useful interim position between friendliness and illegality
Declaration on Friendly Relations UNGA Resolution on use of force
'States shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations'
Settling disputes by peaceful means
Declaration on Friendly Relations UNGA Resolution on intervention
Duty not to intervene in matters within domestic jurisdiction
Declaration on Friendly Relations UNGA Resolution on equality
Equal rights and self-determination
Sovereign equality of states, equal rights and duties and equal members of the intl community
Pahuja on Declaration on Friendly Relations
Pahuja: not just calling for neutrality but issuing a wider challenge to IL as a whole
Western capitals saying states refusing to join IL
Treaties of amity
Treaties of friendship, often used to get enemies into court
Nicaragua, US and Iran
Decline of neutrality
Declines as a consequence of rise of ICL, LoN and UN Charter - collective security/policing model
War in Ukraine - exodus, Sweden and Finland have renounced neutrality
Jefferson on neutrality
Jefferson, 1801: US as a friendly neutral seeking 'peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none'
Grotius' requirements for neutrality
Impartiality, free passage, furnishing supplies to both sides
Only in 'doubtful cases' (unclear which side is just protagonist)
Where one side 'wicked', friendship due to the just warrior
Collective security regime
Charter, collective action
George W Bush, 2001 'every nation in the world now has a decision to make, either you are with us or you are with the terrorists'
Bandung Conference year
1955
Bandung participants
Asian and African states, most of whom newly independent
Bandung contribution
Move towards eventual creation of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) - 120 countries not formally aligned with or against any major power bloc, advance interests of developing nations in Cold War context
Bandung on colonialism and cultural cooperation
Took note of existence of colonialism and this prevents cultural cooperation and suppresses national cultures of the people
Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco, basic right of the people to study their own language and culture has been suppressed
Condemned racialism as means of cultural suppression
Bandung on ending colonialism
'Colonialism in all its manifestations is an evil which should speedily be brought to an end'
Bandung on disarmament
Disarmament to save mankind and civilisation from fear and prospect of wholesale destruction
Bandung on Palestine
Support for Palestine and achievement of peaceful settlement of the Palestine question
Pahuja's description of Bandung
Bringing its own legal traditions, an 'encounter'
A 'juridical-political imaginary of a certain moment, which the reader may juxtapose with what is imagined to be possible now for international law for, in, and of the Global South'
Nehru's international as distinct from.. (Pahuja)
i) International-ism of European imperialism and its postwar continuation as imperial-internationalisation
ii) universal internationalisms
Nehru's internationalism (Pahuja)
Role imagined for international law is not to effect the transformation of others, but to allow different peoples and nations, with different laws, to meet with dignity - law of encounter not of inclusion
Universal internationalisms (Pahuja)
Putatively universal
Nehru and those at Bandung did not see European IL as the only law relating to conduct between nations, or that it would be the future, nor did they experience it as such
Renarrating history to articulate the context between their experience of a multiplicity of laws in the world
Cold War as experienced by Third World (Pahuja)
Cold War from perspective of American policy came to be experienced by the Third World as a new phase of imperialism
Pahuja on the disagreement of Cold War
European project of civilisation reshaped by 'an internecine [destructive to both sides] disagreement between warring siblings, nominally capitalist and communist, each set on a different version of (European) modernisation.'
Pahuja on the idea of newness of African and Asian states
Bandung refuted
Idea of newness relies on conflation of the juridical form of European nation-statehood with the existence of organised community and between European-style sovereignty with political and legal authority
Pahuja on why African and Asian states were viewed as 'new'
'Unless there were forms recognisable in a European idiom, there was either nothing, or at best, things that were pre-something.' - terra nullius
Tabula rasa (Pahuja
Countries turned into blank slate for enlightenment
Paradoxically coupling attempt to recognise East and accord dignity with US superiority manifest in the developmentalism of its foreign policy
Bandung on 'newness'
Imperialism as an "interruption" to both ongoing civilisations and inter-civilisational encounters. 'Asia and Africa cradle of great religions and civilisations'
Nandy quote about what the Third World was searching for (quoted by Pahuja)
'The search for dignity and stature in the world community'
West's view of Bandung (Pahuja)
IL shifting from being the law of the 'small family of nations' into claiming allegiance of nations that had no part in building it up, nations that were understood as either never to have known, or no longer to accept, the fundamental beliefs and sentiments on which it was originally founded
Nehru on West's view of Bandung
Nehru speech - seen as children meeting away from their teacher
Pahuja on whether we can refute IL as being European
Even if possible to repudiate IL as European, need not be wholly refusal, many of the conditions for entry were drawn from practices of jurisdiction particular to European public law
Eurocentrism (Pahuja)
European IL had to actively claim for itself the proper name of law during 19th century
Recent idea that European IL has no rivals
Bandung and Nehru on contemporaneous existence of multiple laws (Pahuja)
Contemporaneous existence of multiple laws was deeply understood, struggle was to work out a way to allow for the ongoing existence of that multiplicity without the laws of most people in the world being relegated to a nonlegal domain