Tort Law: Occupiers Liability

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/26

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

27 Terms

1
New cards

What are the KEY statutes within Occupiers Liability and what do they deal with?

The OLA 1957- lawful visitors

The OLA 1984- trespassers

2
New cards

What is meant by an Occupier?

The person who has control over preventing harm to others within the premises

3
New cards

What case clarified that multiple parties can simultaneously be occupier and owe a duty of care?

Wheat v E.Lacon

4
New cards

What section defines "Premises"?

Section 1(3)

5
New cards

What is meant by Premises?

Any fixed or movable structure

6
New cards

Under the OLA 1957, what counts as a lawful visitor?

Adults, Children, Tradespeople, Independent contractors

7
New cards

What section defines the Duty of Care towards Adults?

Section 2(2) of the OLA 1957

8
New cards

What is the Duty of Care owed to Adults?

Occupiers must take the reasonable precautions in order to prevent harm from the visitor

9
New cards

What cases establishes the Duty of care owed to Adult visitors?

Laverton v Kiapasha

10
New cards

What Section defines the Duty if Care owed to Child visitors?

S2(3) of the OLA 1957

11
New cards

What is the Duty of Care owed to Children?

An occupier must be prepared for children to be less careful and so the premise must be reasonably safe for a child of that age

12
New cards

What case established that 'alurements' must be removed if they risk harm?

Glasgow Corporation v Taylor

13
New cards

What is the difference between Tradespeople and Independent Contractors?

Contractors own their own business and work independently whilst Tradespeople are hired by the occupier and work under their supervision

14
New cards

What section defines the Duty of Care for Tradespeople?

Section 2(3)(b) of the OLA 1957

15
New cards

What is the Duty of Care owed to Tradespeople?

The occupier cannot be liable for any risks in which the tradesman is expected to identify and avoid

16
New cards

What case established that the Occupier cannot be held liable if they gave the Tradesperson a sufficient warning of potential danger?

Roles v Nathan

17
New cards

What is the Duty of Care owed to Independent Contractors?

The occupier cannot be held liable for the actions of those with greater expertise

18
New cards

What 3 things must be proven for the Occupier to discharge their duty to Independent Contractors?

1)It was reasonable to hire a specialist contractor

2)Contractor was checked for competence

3)Occupier must have reasonably ensured the work was carried out properly, unless too technical

19
New cards

What case established that the Occupier cannot rely on the Expertise if too technical?

Haseldine v Daw & Son

20
New cards

What are the 4 Defences for Occupiers?

-Contributory Negligence

-Volenti Non Fit Injuria

-Warning Notices

-Exclusion Clauses

21
New cards

What are Warning Notices?

Can be written or verbal. Must be clear, accessible and proportionate to the risk involved

22
New cards

What Section states that Warning Notices can be a complete defence if used properly?

S4 of the OLA 1957

23
New cards

Which case established that a Sufficient Warning must make the Visitor reasonably safe?

Rae v Marrs

24
New cards

What Section defines Exclusion Clauses?

S2(1) of the OLA 1957 allows occupiers to 'restrict, modify or exclude his duty by agreement or otherwise'

25
New cards

What Act restricts Exclusion Clauses?

The Consumer Rights Act 2015 S65 states that a trader cannot 'exclude or restrict liability for death of personal injury resulting from negligence'

26
New cards

What are the 3 conditions for an Occupier owing a duty to Trespassers?

1)Under S1(3)(a), the occupier is aware of the danger

2)Under S1(3)(b), the occupier knows that trespassers may be near the danger

3)Under S1(3)(c), its reasonable to expect the occupier to offer protection

27
New cards

Ratcliff v McConnell

Higgs v Foster

Tomilson