CMN midterm pt. 3

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/27

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 7:35 PM on 7/12/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

28 Terms

1
New cards

What is self-description?

info you’re comfortable telling others

2
New cards

what is self-disclosure?

revealing private, unknown info abt yourself.

3
New cards

2 requirements of self-disclosure

intentionally revealed and involves some risk

4
New cards

2 dimensions of self-disclosure

breadth and depth

5
New cards

What is breadth

#of topics

6
New cards

What is depth?

level of intimacy of what you share

7
New cards

Characteristics of self-disclosure

dyad (2 ppl), reciprocal, over time, increases as relationship develops, rare, can be evaluative/descriptive

8
New cards

4 functions of self-disclosure?

relational escalation, catharsis (makes us feel better), clarification (reveal that we need help), self-awareness (what u are comfy sharing)

9
New cards

why don’t ppl self-disclose?

too risky and isn’t appropriate for situation

10
New cards

Social penetration theory? (Altman & Taylor 1973)

relationships develop by weighing costs and rewards

11
New cards

4 stages of social penetration theory?

orientation, exploratory affective exchange (test waters), affective exchange (frequent self-disclosure), stable exchange (all topics)

12
New cards

Guttman progression

breadth and depth should increase as relationships move through the stages

13
New cards

Norm of reciprocity

both ppl should self-disclose equally in beginning for relationship to develop but once relationship is developed reciprocity is less important.

14
New cards

Hay’s study

greater breadth and depth of self-disclosure predicted stronger friendships. 63% of relationships became close friends in the study.

15
New cards

Flora & Segrin (1999) study

how romantic relationships develop after breakups. 3 components (thoughts/cognitive, feelings/affective, and behaviors). found that behaviors developed before thoughts and feelings.

16
New cards

What is friendship?

voluntary personal relationship providing intimacy and assistance where both people enjoy each others company

17
New cards

4 attributes of friendship

acceptance, support, enjoyment, caring, trust, equality, authenticity

18
New cards

friendship diff from love

less emotionally complex, fewer obligations, less physical attraction, less intense emotional expression

19
New cards

Similarites in friendship and love

respect, trust, responsiveness, capitalization (increase happiness), social support (emotional, informational, instrumental)

20
New cards

optimal matching model

the most effective support is the type the other person actually wants

21
New cards

What is relationship maintenance? (Dindia & Canary 1993)

behaviors used to keep relationship healthy, stable levels, satisfying, or repaired (keep relationship at desired level)

22
New cards

3 critical maintenance behaviors in friendships

openness, supportiveness, positivity

23
New cards

friends-with-benefits (7 types)

true friends, network opportunism, just sex, transition out (ex-sex), intentional transition in, unintentional transition in, failed transition

24
New cards

Social exchange theory

theory explaining/predicting relationship decisions/behaviors by comparing rewards and costs

25
New cards

5 assumptions

social behavior is series of transactions, people maximize rewards and minimize costs, receiving rewards creates obligation, people act in self-interest, relationships involve interdependence (one persons outcomes depend on other persons actions)

26
New cards

interdependence theory

how partners evaluate their relationship based on benefits vs. costs. comparison level: what you believe you deserve; comparison level of alternatives (what you believe you could get in another relationship)

27
New cards

3 hypothesis partner preference hypothesis

similarity hypothesis (match up w/someone w same attachment style), complimnentary hypothesis (preference for someone who compliments their attachment style), attachment-security (all individuals prefer secure partners)

28
New cards

Uncertainty theory