1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
overview
Immanuel Kant was an important German philosopher of the 18th century
Kant believed that there is a universal, objective moral law that we can access and know through our reason
Kant believed in acting morally in accordance with the good regardless of the consequences
maxims
another word for moral rules, determined by reason
deontological
from the Latin for ‘duty’, ethics focused on the intrinsic rightness and wrongness of actions
duty
duties are created by the moral law, to follow it is our duty
the word deontological means duty-based
categorical imperative
an unconditional moral obligation that is always binding irrespective of a person’s inclination or purpose
hypothetical imperative
a moral obligation that applies only if one desires the implied goal
kingdom of ends
an imagined future in which all people act in accordance to the moral laws, the categorical imperative
summum bonum
the highest, most supreme good
duty and good will
Kantian ethics are deontological - they focus on the idea of duty
Kant thought there is objective and absolute moral law. morality is not just personal preference or invented by society
moral law can be known through reason
Kant thought the only thing that can be called good without any qualification is the good will
purity of motive is important for Kant - an action is good if it is done for the right reason, but the same action is not virtuous if it is done to impress others or for some other kind of personal gain
morality should not be driven by emotion. we should do the right thing because it is the right thing, not because we feel sorry for someone or loyal to them, or for any other emotional reason
Kant gives examples of duties, such as: doing good to others, not making false promises, being truthful, not hurting others, pursuing the greater good, recognising the right to private property…
Kant’s understanding of moral knowledge
Kant thought knowledge can be divided into two kinds:
knowledge that comes from sense experience, a posteriori knowledge
knowledge that we have at first hand, a priori knowledge
Kant thought moral knowledge is a priori
we do not need experience to know what is right and wrong
moral knowledge comes from within
he also thought knowledge is synthetic rather analytic: we cannot tell whether something is right or wrong by looking at it. we bring additional information, from our knowledge of right and wrong. because we bring additional knowledge when we are making judgements, Kant thought moral knowledge must be synthetic
imperatives
Kant understood moral law in terms of the hypothetical imperative and the categorical imperative. he thought that moral law, which is good in itself, is categorical, not hypothetical
the hypothetical imperative refers to rules we must follow if we want to achieve particular results. if i want to achieve x, then i must do y
categorical imperative refers to rules that must be followed with no ‘ifs’. moral rules are categorical imperatives. they must be followed, regardless of what we hope to achieve in the end results and regardless of our emotions or personal preferences
three formulations of the categorical imperative
the universal law of nature - our moral rules must be capable of being universal (they should be universalisable). they should be rules that apply to everyone at all times and in all cultures. we should not make rules where we expect to be allowed to break them when it suits us. truth-telling is Kant’s major example of this - we should always tell the truth
the end in itself - people should not use others as a means to an end. they should treat others as people, not as tools to get what they want
the kingdom of ends - people should act as if their behaviour is setting the laws in an ideal kingdom. imagine we live in an ideal society of rational people. which laws would we have to govern behaviour? always behave as if you are following those rules
Kant’s three postulates
Kant makes three assumptions (postulates) which underpin ethics:
freedom - we are all free to make moral decisions. if we were not free to choose then we could not be praised or blamed for what we do as we would have no choice. we must assume we are free to do our duty
immortality - good people should be rewarded with ultimate happiness. this is the highest good (summum bonum). in this life we can see that it does not always happen that good people are rewarded with happiness. we must assume there is an afterlife in which justice is done in the end
God - it seems that Kant assumes there must be a God to bring about the afterlife and to ensure that justice is done. Kant thought that human reason could not know God, but his ethics imply God
possible strengths of Kantian ethics
Kant’s ideas of moral absolutes can be appealing. morality is not changeable depending on fashionable opinion; there are some thing which are always absolutely right or wrong
Kant emphasises human moral reasoning, giving autonomy to people wasting time wondering whether, in this circumstance, they still need to tell the truth. rules are rules, which can make them easy to know and apply
Kant recognises the dignity and worth of other human beings, whatever their status in society
possible weaknesses of Kantian ethics
Kantian ethics can be seen as cold and lacking in compassion for people’s individual circumstances
some argue that Kant fails to recognise the importance of human emotion in moral decision-making
sometimes Kant seems to be recommending sticking to rules even when it becomes clear that such actions will lead to terrible consequences
Kant does not tell us what to do when duties conflict. he does not give guidance about how to make a choice
religious believers might think that Kant seems to give human reason a more important place in morality that gives to God
To what extent should ethical judgements about right and wrong be based on the extent to which duty is served?
‘Kantian ethics do not give enough importance to human emotions such as sympathy and compassion’ Discuss