1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
BRICS
Brazil, Russia, China, South Africa
originally international investment strategies
today supranational institution
geopolitical counterpart to G7 (rich countries: USA, Russia…)
begin 2024: Egypt, Ethiopian, Arab, Iran joined BRICS Plus
stronger geopolitical voice to global south
more than 40 nations interested to join
Deglobalization
trade wars
populism politicies
(radical) movement
COVID-19
wars and armed conflicts
what are the effects of deglobalization?
increases in trade tariffs
populist policies: trigger negative perception of international trade/investment
radical movements increase risks and costs of global businesses
supply chain resilience/early warning systems
divestment (deinvestment)
formal institutions
explicit and codified rules, laws and regulations
organized structures (tax regulations, curfews)
informal institutions
unwritten norms, traditions, social practices
normative: social norms, values, beliefs
cognitive: shared beliefs, assumptions, mental models (Brille)
Barrick Gold and JV in Tanzania
disputes according taxes, export, significant fine
2017 banned gold/silver export and demand 190 billion
Verbesserung:
environmental conservation
community development
responsible resource extraction
political systems
political organization of country (democracy…)
Venezuela
nationalizing ressource (Staat kontrolliert)
primary oil exporters worldwide
PDVSA parter for incoming FDI
Bolvarian Revolution (1998): increased nationalization
J-Curve
Ian Bremmer
openness not linear to stability
consolidated/closed countries exhibit high levels of stability
closeness to openness can face deteriorating levels
Importance political systems for MNCs
determines
where policy-makings happens
which regulations are established
which interests these regulations reflect
how MNCs can influence policy-making legal and illicit (illegal)
political systems determines how frequent regimes are changing (Präsidentenwechsel)
democratic vs. authoritarian
most countries hard to classify
russia: nominally democracy, but authoritarian style
china: authoritarian, but sometimes democracy at local levels
competing political and bureaucratic interests (innerhalb Konflikte)
China, Japan, France no monoliths (divers)
government support domestic firms
local/bureaucratic support foreign firms
political risks
macropolitical: affect all firms in country
war, change government
micropolitical: only specifc firms/venture types
regulations, taxes
negative effects on national levels
government stability
policy changes
geopolitical tension
changes in rules of game
methods to measure political risks
POLCON: likelyhood to change in the policy regime
ICRG (International Country Risk Guide): 22 variables (political, economic, financial risk)
checks and balances
=”first order” safeguards
democratic countries
protect from risks
Henisz
developed a framework for assessemnt POLCON
counterbalancing (prevent one power becoming too strong) powers lead to reduction in risks
foreign firms like checks and balances for international investments
elections
clearly timed events with hetereogenous and uncertain outcomes
have relevant implications for firm operations, investment, financing
heterogenous event effects
elections
financial crises
homogenous event effects
christmas
pandemics, terrorism, diasters
fixed event timing
elections
seasonal events
flexible event timing
financial crises
pandemics, terrorism, disasters
analyzing politic systems
who are the relevant actors?
how is power distributes? (centralized: one makes the rule or federals: locals have different)
how much power do regional governments have?
(heaven is high, emperor is far away)
how stable is a state?
changes happen more in developing countries
how stable is policy? (POLCON)
what is the capacity of government to create and executive policy? if no then corruption
how are political, legal, economic systems connected?
political: make rules
legal: enforcement
economic: produce wealth
National legal systems affecting international firms?
because nationals sometimes have different laws than internationals (in/direct effects)
Civil Law
codified statues and comprehensive legal codes
Europe, Latin America, Asia, parts of Africa
restriction role of judges: only interpretation and application of statues
binding precedent not as central
contracts/agreements by MNCs by legalcodes
Common Law
development of legal principles/judicial decisions
England, US
interpret laws and apply legal principles based on past ruling
doctrine of stare decisis: must follow precents (consistency and predictability)
doctrine of faith and fair dealing
US entering Civil Law countries?
must adhere local legal principles
predictability/clarity
navigate legally and resolve disputes using explicit provisions in lega codes
US entering Common Law countries?
rely on Common Law countries
adaptility allow to
diverse legal landscapes
use established principles for agreement
risk mitigation
dispute resolution
Investor protecion
strongest in Common Law countries (US)
lowest in French
stronger protection with bigger/stronger financial market
Global Minimum Tax
OECD/G20 legal framework steblished 15% minmum effective tax rate for MNCs to ensure fair allocation of tax revenues across jurisdiction
GMT: legal principles
implementation in progress
through domestic legislation in both law systems
relies on international coordination (Zusammenarbeit)
GMT: implications
profit shifting to low-tax jurisdiction less effective
transparent reporting and compliance with global standards
help countries to protect tax base from erosion
market economies
Anglo Saxon capitalism
(neo)liberal
free market economy
country trade/industry control by private owners
(UK, US)
mixed economies
european social democratic models
marked-driven + state-let
European states
state-led-economies
command
planned
centralized
form statistic economy
government control
Cuba, Singapore, Japan
pure forms don’t exist
US GDP on healthcare, defense, education