4.4.3: Controlling MNCs

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/6

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

7 Terms

1
New cards

power of MNCs

  • powerful

  • contribute significantly to global wealth and job creation

  • help with inward investment and building foreign currency reserves for developing nations

  • benefits consumers

  • effectively use world resources

  • profits invested in useful R&D

  • criticised for being too powerful and exploiting stakeholders

  • operate as monopolists

  • exploit consumers through high prices

  • dominate markets

  • make it difficult for small firms to survive

  • maximimise profits

  • use working practices polluting the environment or consuming large quantities of non renewable resources

  • control flows of profit and revenue through countries with low tax rates and avoid tax payments

  • difficult for national governments to control MNCs

    • can easily relocate and take FDI, tax revenue and employment

2
New cards

political influence

SOEs:

  • large MNCs owned by the state - state owned enterprises SOEs

  • effective method of control

  • political power exercised to create, manage and end a business

  • extensive political influence over organisations

  • lead to commercial and ethical issues

  • drawbacks of state ownership:

    • corruption - SOEs might be favoured by powerful politicians

    • state owned operations may take the capital other firms might better employ

      • politicians or regulators decide where funding should go

      • inefficient businesses may be given more money than they need and not be subject to competitive forces that reduce price and improve efficiency

    • shareholders and other investor rights ignored

      • mot true beneficiaries of the business

      • actual beneficiaries - politicians

    • ignores investment expenditure

      • less competitive pressure from other firms with state ownership

      • less incentive

non SOEs:

  • also important for non SOEs

  • national strategic priorities, boost employment or regulate financial institutions

  • privately owned businesses controlled using a number of political initatives:

    • tarrifs

    • quotas

    • regulations

    • local content requirement

    • direct/indirect ownership restrictions

    • support domestic industries through subsidies or tax breaks

    • lobbying by politicians to influence business decisions

    • politicians retiring to seats on the boards of plcs

<p>SOEs:</p><ul><li><p>large MNCs owned by the state - state owned enterprises SOEs</p></li><li><p>effective method of control</p></li><li><p>political power exercised to create, manage and end a business </p></li><li><p>extensive political influence over organisations </p></li><li><p>lead to commercial and ethical issues </p></li><li><p>drawbacks of state ownership:</p><ul><li><p>corruption - SOEs might be favoured by powerful politicians </p></li><li><p>state owned operations may take the capital other firms might better employ </p><ul><li><p>politicians or regulators decide where funding should go </p></li><li><p>inefficient businesses may be given more money than they need and not be subject to competitive forces that reduce price and improve efficiency </p></li></ul></li><li><p>shareholders and other investor rights ignored</p><ul><li><p>mot true beneficiaries of the business</p></li><li><p>actual beneficiaries - politicians </p></li></ul></li><li><p>ignores investment expenditure </p><ul><li><p>less competitive pressure from other firms with state ownership</p></li><li><p>less incentive</p></li></ul></li></ul></li></ul><p>non SOEs:</p><ul><li><p>also important for non SOEs </p></li><li><p>national strategic priorities, boost employment or regulate financial institutions </p></li><li><p>privately owned businesses controlled using a number of political initatives:</p><ul><li><p>tarrifs</p></li><li><p>quotas</p></li><li><p>regulations</p></li><li><p>local content requirement </p></li><li><p>direct/indirect ownership restrictions </p></li><li><p>support domestic industries through subsidies or tax breaks </p></li><li><p>lobbying by politicians to influence business decisions</p></li><li><p>politicians retiring to seats on the boards of plcs </p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
3
New cards

legal control

  • competition policy

    • exists to promote competition

    • ensures markets operate as efficiently as possible

    • specialised agencies set up to protect producers and consumers from unfair or anti-competitive practices

      • ensures firms don’t abuse market power, fix prices, or use pricing strategies to drive out competition, and don’t work together illegally

  • taxation policy

    • used to raise revenue

    • may help control MNC activities

    • low corporate tax = attracts huge FDI

      • may upset politicians in other countries

    • tax avoidance = big companies use differing systems to avoid tax

  • legislation

    • provide legal framework for business operations

    • system of incentives and penalties to ensure at-risk groups

    • too much intervention = discourages enterprise, deters foreign investment

      • prevents growth in income

      • reduces job creation

      • decreases tax revenue

      • reduces consumer choice

    • too little intervention = may not give attention to stakeholders best interest

    • legislation to penalise companies damaging environment, exploiting employees, engaging in anti-competitive practices, bullying suppliers and exploiting consumers

<ul><li><p>competition policy</p><ul><li><p>exists to promote competition</p></li><li><p>ensures markets operate as efficiently as possible</p></li><li><p>specialised agencies set up to protect producers and consumers from unfair or anti-competitive practices</p><ul><li><p>ensures firms don’t abuse market power, fix prices, or use pricing strategies to drive out competition, and don’t work together illegally</p></li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p>taxation policy</p><ul><li><p>used to raise revenue</p></li><li><p>may help control MNC activities </p></li><li><p>low corporate tax = attracts huge FDI</p><ul><li><p>may upset politicians in other countries </p></li></ul></li><li><p>tax avoidance = big companies use differing systems to avoid tax </p></li></ul></li><li><p>legislation</p><ul><li><p>provide legal framework for business operations </p></li><li><p>system of incentives and penalties to ensure at-risk groups </p></li><li><p>too much intervention = discourages enterprise, deters foreign investment</p><ul><li><p>prevents growth in income</p></li><li><p>reduces job creation </p></li><li><p>decreases tax revenue</p></li><li><p>reduces consumer choice </p></li></ul></li><li><p>too little intervention = may not give attention to stakeholders best interest</p></li><li><p>legislation to penalise companies damaging environment, exploiting employees, engaging in anti-competitive practices, bullying suppliers and exploiting consumers </p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
4
New cards

consumer pressure

  • apply pressure by avoiding products

  • forced to consider a wide range of social, political and historical sensitivities when marketing products in ethnically and culturally diverse regions

  • use of review systems allows customers to write freely about their experiences

  • companies want to avoid bad reviews

5
New cards

pressure groups

  • company behaviour may violate what many people consider acceptable but not break any laws

  • publicise bad behaviour and threaten to damage the image of form

  • voluntary organisations

  • methods to control MNCs:

    • boycotting - withdrawing from commercial or social relations

    • media criticism - criticised in the media, protest movements

    • direct action - demonstrations, protests, strikes or sabotage to achieve a political or social goal

    • lobbying - taking issues directly to government in an effort to influence change

<ul><li><p>company behaviour may violate what many people consider acceptable but not break any laws</p></li><li><p>publicise bad behaviour and threaten to damage the image of form</p></li><li><p>voluntary organisations </p></li><li><p>methods to control MNCs:</p><ul><li><p>boycotting - withdrawing from commercial or social relations </p></li><li><p>media criticism - criticised in the media, protest movements</p></li><li><p>direct action - demonstrations, protests, strikes or sabotage to achieve a political or social goal </p></li><li><p>lobbying - taking issues directly to government in an effort to influence change </p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
6
New cards

social media

  • interaction between electronic and mobile devices, applications and people, that allows users to create content

  • controls MNC behaviour by:

    • making information collection easier

    • increasing social awareness

    • ensuring greater transparency

    • bringing together people to create social authority to challenge large companies

7
New cards

self-regulation

  • group of firms in the same industry agree to follow a set of rules and guidelines to ensure proper conduct

  • guidelines specific to industry

  • designed to ensure companies maintain common standards

  • address issues such as health and safety, ethical behaviour, responsibility to employees and consumers and environmental practices

  • code of practice

  • these companies also practice self-policing

    • signed up businesses monitor their own activities

    • set performance targets

  • advantages of self-regulation:

    • avoids rigorous, expensive government regulation and compliance costs

    • needs of stakeholders better served

    • improved image and reputation

    • easier for business to encourage its employees to adopt ethical behaviour and principles

    • benefits taxpayers

  • disadvantage: conflict of interest - difficult to comply if financial performance is threatened