Comprehensive Glossary of Rhetoric, Style, and Argument Terms

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/72

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

A complete set of vocabulary flashcards covering key rhetorical terms, style elements, and argument terms and fallacies from the lecture notes.

Last updated 4:17 AM on 8/25/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

73 Terms

1
New cards

audience

The listener, viewer, or reader of a text.

2
New cards

concession

An acknowledgment that an opposing argument may be true or reasonable.

3
New cards

connotation

Meanings or associations that readers have with a word beyond its dictionary definition, or denotation.

4
New cards

context

The circumstances, atmosphere, attitudes, and events surrounding a text.

5
New cards

counterargument

An opposing argument to the one a writer is putting forward.

6
New cards

ethos

Greek for 'character.' Speakers appeal to ethos to demonstrate that they are credible and trustworthy to speak on a given topic.

7
New cards

logos

Greek for 'embodied thought.' Speakers appeal to logos, or reason, by offering clear, rational ideas and using specific details, examples, facts, statistics, or expert testimony to back them up.

8
New cards

occasion

The time and place a speech is given or a piece is written.

9
New cards

pathos

Greek for 'suffering' or 'experience.' Speakers appeal to pathos to emotionally motivate their audience.

10
New cards

persona

Greek for 'mask.' The face or character that a speaker shows to his or her audience.

11
New cards

polemic

Greek for 'hostile.' An aggressive argument that tries to establish the superiority of one opinion over all others.

12
New cards

propaganda

The spread of ideas and information to further a cause, or in its negative sense, the use of rumors, lies, disinformation, and scare tactics to damage or promote a cause.

13
New cards

purpose

The goal the speaker wants to achieve.

14
New cards

refutation

A denial of the validity of an opposing argument.

15
New cards

rhetoric

As Aristotle defined the term, 'the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion.'

16
New cards

rhetorical appeals

Rhetorical techniques used to persuade an audience by emphasizing what they find most important or compelling (ethos, logos, and pathos).

17
New cards

rhetorical triangle (Aristotelian triangle)

A diagram that illustrates the interrelationship among the speaker, audience, and subject in determining a text.

18
New cards

SOAPS

A mnemonic device that stands for Subject, Occasion, Audience, Purpose, and Speaker.

19
New cards

speaker

The person or group who creates a text.

20
New cards

subject

The topic of a text; what the text is about.

21
New cards

text

Any cultural product that can be 'read' — meaning not just consumed and comprehended, but investigated.

22
New cards

alliteration

Repetition of the same sound beginning several words or syllables in sequence.

23
New cards

allusion

Brief reference to a person, event, or place (real or fictitious) or to a work of art.

24
New cards

anaphora

Repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive phrases, clauses, or lines.

25
New cards

antimetabole

Repetition of words in reverse order.

26
New cards

antithesis

Opposition, or contrast, of ideas or words in a parallel construction.

27
New cards

archaic diction

Old-fashioned or outdated choice of words.

28
New cards

asyndeton

Omission of conjunctions between coordinate phrases, clauses, or words.

29
New cards

cumulative sentence

Sentence that completes the main idea at the beginning of the sentence and then builds and adds on.

30
New cards

hortative sentence

Sentence that exhorts, urges, entreats, implores, or calls to action.

31
New cards

imperative sentence

Sentence used to command or enjoin.

32
New cards

inversion

Inverted order of words in a sentence (variation of the subject-verb-object order).

33
New cards

juxtaposition

Placement of two things closely together to emphasize similarities or differences.

34
New cards

metaphor

Figure of speech that compares two things without using like or as.

35
New cards

oxymoron

Paradoxical juxtaposition of words that seem to contradict one another.

36
New cards

parallelism

Similarity of structure in a pair or series of related words, phrases, or clauses.

37
New cards

periodic sentence

Sentence whose main clause is withheld until the end.

38
New cards

personification

Attribution of a lifelike quality to an inanimate object or an idea.

39
New cards

rhetorical question

Figure of speech in the form of a question posed for rhetorical effect rather than for the purpose of getting an answer.

40
New cards

synedoche

Figure of speech that uses a part to represent the whole.

41
New cards

zeugma

Use of two different words in a grammatically similar way that produces different, often incongruous, meanings.

42
New cards

ad hominem

Latin for 'against the man,' this fallacy refers to the specific diversionary tactic of switching the argument from the issue at hand to the character of the other speaker.

43
New cards

ad populum (bandwagon appeal)

This fallacy occurs when evidence boils down to 'everybody's doing it, so it must be a good thing to do.'

44
New cards

appeal to false authority

This fallacy occurs when someone who has no expertise to speak on an issue is cited as an authority.

45
New cards

argument

A process of reasoned inquiry; a persuasive discourse resulting in a coherent and considered movement from a claim to a conclusion.

46
New cards

backing

In the Toulmin model, backing consists of further assurances or data without which the assumption lacks authority.

47
New cards

begging the question

A fallacy in which a claim is based on evidence or support that is in doubt.

48
New cards

circular reasoning

A fallacy in which the writer repeats the claim as a way to provide evidence.

49
New cards

claim

Also called an assertion or a proposition, a claim states the argument's main idea or position.

50
New cards

claim of fact

A claim of fact asserts that something is true or not true.

51
New cards

claim of policy

A claim of policy proposes a change.

52
New cards

claim of value

A claim of value argues that something is good or bad, right or wrong.

53
New cards

classical oration

The five-part argument structure used by classical rhetoricians: introduction, narration, confirmation, refutation, and conclusion.

54
New cards

closed thesis

A statement of the main idea of the argument that also previews the major points the writer intends to make.

55
New cards

deduction

A logical process whereby one reaches a conclusion by starting with a general principle or universal truth (a major premise) and applying it to a specific case (a minor premise).

56
New cards

either/or (false dilemma)

A fallacy in which the speaker presents two extreme options as the only possible choices.

57
New cards

faulty analogy

A fallacy that occurs when an analogy compares two things that are not comparable.

58
New cards

first-hand evidence

Evidence based on something the writer knows, whether it's from personal experience, observations, or general knowledge of events.

59
New cards

hasty generalization

A fallacy in which a faulty conclusion is reached because of inadequate evidence.

60
New cards

induction

A logical process whereby the writer reasons from particulars to universals, using specific cases in order to draw a conclusion.

61
New cards

logical fallacy

Potential vulnerabilities or weaknesses in an argument arising from a failure to make a logical connection between the claim and the evidence.

62
New cards

open thesis

An open thesis is one that does not list all the points the writer intends to cover in an essay.

63
New cards

post hoc ergo propter hoc

Latin for 'after which therefore because of which,' meaning that it is incorrect to always claim that something is a cause just because it happened earlier.

64
New cards

qualifier

In the Toulmin model, the qualifier uses words like usually, probably, maybe, in most cases, and most likely to temper the claim.

65
New cards

quantitative evidence

Includes things that can be measured, cited, counted, or otherwise represented in numbers.

66
New cards

rebuttal

In the Toulmin model, a rebuttal gives voice to possible objections.

67
New cards

reservation

In the Toulmin model, a reservation explains the terms and conditions necessitated by the qualifier.

68
New cards

Rogerian arguments

Arguments based on the assumption that having a full understanding of an opposing position is essential to responding to it persuasively and refuting it accommodationally.

69
New cards

second-hand evidence

Evidence that is accessed through research, reading, and investigation, including factual and historical information, expert opinion, and quantitative data.

70
New cards

straw man

A fallacy that occurs when a speaker chooses a deliberately poor or oversimplified example in order to ridicule and refute an idea.

71
New cards

syllogism

A logical structure that uses the major premise and minor premise to reach a necessary conclusion.

72
New cards

Toulmin model

An approach to analyzing and constructing arguments created by British philosopher Stephen Toulmin, stated as a template: Because…, therefore…, since…, on account of…, unless…

73
New cards

warrant

In the Toulmin model, the warrant expresses the assumption necessarily shared by the speaker and the audience.