di ko alam ano ba to basta ge
Introduction
Clearly states the background that highlights the interest of the study.
Introduction
Contains the gaps and what is not known yet.
Significance of the study
Describes the purpose of the study.
Theoretical framework
Discusses the major theories logically and how it supports the research/study.
Study site
Instruments
Ethical consideration
Discusses utility (3)
Data gathering
Discusses the process and describes the role of the researchers.
Field research
Defined as a qualitative method of data collection that aims to observe, interact, and understand people while they are in a natural environment.
To observe
To analyze a specific behavior
END OBJECTIVE OF FIELD RESEARCH (2)
Direct observation
Participant observation
Ethnography
METHODS OF FIELD RESEARCH (3)
Direct observation
Observing subjects in their natural environment. Behavior or outcome is not interpreted in any way by the researcher. This method in widely used in public setting.
Participant observation
Researchers are deeply involved in research process, and they are not purely an observer. This method is also conducted in a natural environment.
Ethnography
Involves social perspectives and cultural values of an entire community.
Central objective of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
To understand what personal and social experiences means to people who experience them.
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
Aims to provide in depth exploration of people’s lived experiences and close examination of how people make sense of their experiences.
Inductive
BASIC PRINCIPLES OF IPA
Uses open-ended questions.
Idiographic
BASIC PRINCIPLES OF IPA
Works at the individual level.
Inductive
Idiographic
Individuals actively interpret their experiences and their world
Concerned of understanding an individual’s lived experiences
BASIC PRINCIPLES OF IPA (4)
Principle 1
CODE OF ETHICS
Respect for dignity of persons and people
Principle 1
CODE OF ETHICS
Respect unique worth and inherent dignity of all human being
Principle 1
CODE OF ETHICS
Respect for diversity among persons and people
Principle 1
CODE OF ETHICS
Respect for beliefs and culture
Principle 1
CODE OF ETHICS
Free and informed consent
Principle 1
CODE OF ETHICS
Privacy for individuals, group, and community
Principle 1
CODE OF ETHICS
Protection of confidentiality of personal information
Principle 1
CODE OF ETHICS
Fairness and justice of treatment of person and people
Principle 1
CODE OF ETHICS
Respect for the environment which ultimately ensures a safe haven or dignified human existence
Principle 2
CODE OF ETHICS
Competent caring for the well-being of persons and people
Principle 2
CODE OF ETHICS
Active concern for well-being of persons and people
Principle 2
CODE OF ETHICS
Do no harm
Principle 2
CODE OF ETHICS
Maximizing benefits, minimizing potential harm
Principle 2
CODE OF ETHICS
Correcting/offsetting harmful effects that have occurred as a result of their actions
Principle 2
CODE OF ETHICS
Maintaining competence
Principle 2
CODE OF ETHICS
Respect the ability of individuals to make decisions of themselves
Principle 3
CODE OF ETHICS
Integrity
Principle 3
CODE OF ETHICS
Honest, truthful, accurate communication
Principle 3
CODE OF ETHICS
Avoiding incomplete disclosure of info
Principle 3
CODE OF ETHICS
Maximizing impartiality and minimizing bias
Principle 3
CODE OF ETHICS
Do not exploit for personal gain
Introduction
INFORMED CONSENT FORM
Contains the rationale, purpose, and gaps. Informing the participants that they are free to ask any questions about the study.
Procedure and Duration of the Interview
INFORMED CONSENT FORM
Indicate how long it would take and how much time they would take and how much time they would need to give.
Risks and Discomforts
INFORMED CONSENT FORM
Indicate possible risks and discomfort in participating.
Benefits
INFORMED CONSENT FORM
Indicate the benefits that will come out when they participate with the study.
Confidentiality and Data Security
INFORMED CONSENT FORM
Indicates who can access the information and ways of disposing gathered data.
Qualitative interviews
Sometimes called intensive or in-depth interview.
Interview schedule
A list containing a set of structured questions that have been prepared.
Structured interview
Also known as standardized or formal interview.
Structured interview
Evaluated candidates based on predetermined questions.
Structured interview
Researcher prepares questions they wanted to ask.
Unstructured interview
Informal or casual interview; unplanned questions with the goal to assess.
Semi-structured interview
Hybrid interview; combines structured and unstructured interview.
Semi-structured interview
Interviewers prepares questions but has flexibility to ask other questions.
Trustworthiness
Quintessential framework of evaluating qualitative research.
Credibility
ELEMENTS OF TRUSTWORTHINESS
Are the results truthful?
Credibility
ELEMENTS OF TRUSTWORTHINESS
*It refers to the confidence that the findings of a study are accurate and truthful representations of the participants’ experiences and perspectives.
Dependability
ELEMENTS OF TRUSTWORTHINESS
Consistency of findings
Dependability
ELEMENTS OF TRUSTWORTHINESS
*Ensures that the research findings are consistent and could be replicated under similar conditions.
Transferability
ELEMENTS OF TRUSTWORTHINESS
Comparable?
Transferability
ELEMENTS OF TRUSTWORTHINESS
*Refers to the extent to which the findings and interpretations from a study can be applied to other contexts or settings beyond the specific research context.
Confirmability
ELEMENTS OF TRUSTWORTHINESS
How accurate?
Confirmability
ELEMENTS OF TRUSTWORTHINESS
*It refers to the degree to which the findings of a study are shaped by the participants’ responses and not by researcher bias, motivations, or perspectives.
Audit trail
*This involves keeping a detailed record of all the decisions made during the research process, including data collection, analysis, and interpretation.
Reflexivity
Incorporation of researcher’s knowledges and perspectives in the study.
Prolonged engagement
APPLICATION OF CREDIBILITY
Persistent observation
Researcher spends considerable amount of time to the participants depending on the nature of the study
Peer debriefing
APPLICATION OF CREDIBILITY
Feedback of another researcher to compare conclusions.
Member checking
APPLICATION OF CREDIBILITY
Select participants to review the finding of the preliminary analysis/transcriptions.
Triangulation
APPLICATION OF CREDIBILITY
*A method used to enhance the credibility and validity of qualitative research by cross-verifying findings through multiple data sources, methods, or perspectives. This approach helps to mitigate the biases and limitations inherent in relying on a single source of information.