Chapter 1: Sources of Bias in Psychological Research

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/17

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering the key biases and concepts discussed in the chapter on bias in psychological research.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

18 Terms

1
New cards

Bias in hypothesis formation

Researchers' commitment to a theory or interpretation that favors or disfavors a gender, shaping the hypothesis and possibly misreading prior research.

2
New cards

Biased research question framing

Asking questions in a way that invites a negative view toward a gender or group (e.g., labeling a topic with stigmatizing wording).

3
New cards

Operational definition bias

Defining a construct in a way that unfairly advantages one gender, such as defining aggression only as physical harm.

4
New cards

Non-representative sampling (sampling bias)

Using participants (e.g., college students, upper-middle-class, White) who do not represent the broader population, leading to biased conclusions.

5
New cards

Confounding variable

An extra variable that could account for observed differences, potentially misattributing effects to gender (e.g., differing exposure to video games).

6
New cards

Experimenter effects

How the experimenter's characteristics (e.g., gender) or behavior can influence participants' responses.

7
New cards

Observer effects

Researchers' cues or expectations subtly shape how participants respond or answer.

8
New cards

Clever Hans effect

Participants respond to unintentional cues from researchers, misattributing ability to the participant rather than to cues themselves.

9
New cards

Participants’ expectancies (demand characteristics)

Participants alter their behavior to fit what they think the study is examining or expects.

10
New cards

Female deficit model (androcentrism)

Describing gender differences in ways that portray men as normal and women as deficient.

11
New cards

Statistical significance vs. practical significance

A result can be statistically significant but have little real-world, practical impact.

12
New cards

Ignoring confounding variables

Failure to account for variables other than gender that could explain observed effects, leading to erroneous conclusions.

13
New cards

Generalizability / population validity

Extending study findings to broader populations may be inappropriate if the sample isn't representative.

14
New cards

Publication bias toward differences

A tendency to publish and highlight studies that show gender differences more than similarities.

15
New cards

Media bias toward gender differences

Popular press and media emphasize differences more than similarities between genders.

16
New cards

Bias Against Female Scientists

Women researchers are underrepresented in publications and citations; publishing and citation gaps vary by field.

17
New cards

Self-citation disparity (gender citation gap)

Male researchers tend to cite themselves more often than female researchers, contributing to citation gaps.

18
New cards

Critical thinking reminder

Always examine the evidence, consider alternate explanations, and avoid accepting findings at face value.