Edward's minority

Problems (1)

Explanations (2)

Edward would not be able to lead troops into war, what is the explanation for this problem?

Other states/countries could therefore look to exploit the potential weakness of a minor on the throne and invade

Fear that England may return to a period of civil war akin to the Wars of the Roses, what is the explanation for this problem?

This would be even more likely if factional struggles developed: a minor would be unable to control them

At 9-years-old it was difficult to portray Edward as powerful or militarily adept, what is the explanation for this problem?

This was the age of ‘personal monarchy’: much of the king’s power dependened on his presence, personality and perceived power. In the past, coins had been used to show Henry VIII in this way

People were aware of certain historical precedents of problems caused by underage kings, what is the explanation of this problem?

For example, Edward V had come to the throne aged 12 in 1483, but was shortly imprisoned in the Tower of London and probably murdered on orders of his uncle and Protector, Richard III

Lord Protector Somerset assumed power over Edward’s regency Council against Henry’s wishes, as Edward knew no better, what is the explanation of this problem?

Henry had wanted a full Regency Council to help govern England until Edward came of age- the fact that one individual assumed dominance lead some to question the legality of his power, and later pose challenges

Edward’s minority not being serious

Edward’s minority not being serious

What is the issue with some sources?

Sources claiming problems associated with Edwards minority are often taken out of context, e.g. Latimer quoting the Bible, was actually a sermon to Edward, praising him

What is a defense against his minority being a problem?

Many historical precedents of minors on the English throne without age-related problems, e.g Henry III- only civil war after he came of age