determining a broad problem
Understand the problem your are seeking to research
It doesn’t mean that something is seriously wrong
It just could be a small issue that if it is fixed, it could improve an existing situation
Define the problem statement
Read literature review and previous studies
Ask people inside organisations that may help us to highlight specific problems
Set clear boundaries
Be specific
Preliminary information gathering
We need to know why it is important to follow this research or to answer this research
It helps us understand what is the problem and why does it exist and is it important
Determining the research objects
Research objectives are reflection of research questions
One research = One objective
Distinguish between a question and objectives in research by highlighting or by referring to the fact that the way of writing is different
The research question style is different than the objective
Research objective is the “Why” of the research
Objectives help solve a problem or change something
The significant of the research (importance)
Understand what are the contribution of the research
theoretical and practical contribution
practical contribution
research is relevant if the problem exists in organisation or a situation that needs to be improved
theoretical contribution
Refers to the literature review, fostering the existing theories and literature. Contradicting results and knowledge is scattered.
3 elements of defining and refining the problem
Relevant: Problem statement will allow you to contribute for policy for practise and also to the existing literature (practical & theoretical contribution)
Feasible: you are able to answer the research question even with restrictions
Interesting
basic types of questions
exploratory
descriptive
causal
exploratory
qualitative
Wanting to explore the research so often the question starts with a “why”
We explore the question by doing stuff like interviews or surveys
“A service provider wants to know why his customers are switching to other service providers?”
descriptive
qualitative or quantitative
Enables the researcher to describe the characteristics of the variables of interest in a situation
Describe specific things or the situation
“What is the profile of the individuals who have loan payments outstanding for 6 months and more?”
causal
quantitative
Cause and effect relationship between different variables
Describe one or more factors that are causing a problem
“Will the sales of product X increase if we increase the advertising budget?”
steps to define and refine the problem
determine a broad problem
define the problem statement
determine the research objectives
the significance/importance of the research
variable
Any concept or construct that varies or changes in value (change occurs at various times or different people)
types of variable
dependent variable (outcome)
independent variable (impact)
moderating variable (qualitative/quantitative)
mediating variable (intervening variable)
dependent variable
Outcome or Effect: The dependent variable is what you measure in an experiment. It's the result that you think will change when you manipulate another variable.
independent variable
Cause or Influence: The independent variable is what you change or control in an experiment to see if it affects the dependent variable.
Moderating variable (Qualitative/Quantitative):
Impacts the relation between independent and dependent variable
Mediating variable (intervening variable):
Comes between the independent and the dependent variables
hypothesis
A proposition that we seek to examine.
“Examining the relationship between X and Y”
A good hypothesis must be testable, acceptable for its purpose, better than it’s opponent
hypothesis statements
Proposition: “employee will be more satisfied when they are more motivated”
If-then statement: “If employees are more motivated, then they will be satisfied
directional hypothesis
The hypothesis indicates the direction of the relationship between the variables, either to be positive or negative.
“There is a positive relationship between x and y”
It tells you which way the outcome is expected to go.
non-directional
No clue about the direction of the relationship
“There is a relation between x and y”
Why do we use this? Relationship have never been explored, conflicting findings
It says there will be a change, but doesn’t say if it will go up or down, more or less, better or worse.
null hypothesis
Proposing there is no relationship between the variables
Set up to be rejected in order to support the alternative hypothesis
alternative hypothesis
There is a relationship between X and Y
Set up to be accepted
Attitudinal scales
Rating scales to rate an object using several responses categories
Ranking scales to make comparison between objects
likert scale
The scale that is used inside the questionnaire in order to allow participants to give their answers.
“Scale 1 to 10 if you agree with a statement”
After developing on or more questions, you adopt a scale to assign numbers to the attributes of the objects, you classify the objects
four types of scales
nominal
ordinal
interval
ratio
nominal scale
Difference: Yes (the two options are different from each other, Like if we ask about their gender, could be male/female)
Order: No (it is not important to know which gender comes on top of which)
Distance: No (distance between the options, we have clear options so the distance isn't important)
Unique Origin: No (no 0 value)
Definition: Categorizes data without any order or numerical value.
ordinal scale
Difference: Yes
Order: Yes (order matters, and difference is important, because diploma is less than the bachelor)
Distance: No (the distance doesn't matter)
Unique Origin: No
Definition: Categorizes data with a specific order or ranking.
interval scale
Difference: Yes
Order: Yes
Distance: Yes (like asking about someone's happiness, could be happy or not or a little happy)
Unique Origin: No
Definition: Measures data with equal intervals between values but no true zero point.
ratio scale
Difference: Yes
Order: Yes
Distance: Yes
Unique Origin: Yes
Definition: Measures data with equal intervals and a true zero point, allowing for meaningful ratios.
validity
Make sure that the questionnaire measures what I intend to measure, or examines what I want to examine.
types of validity
Face validity
Content validity
Internal validity
External validity
Construct validity (needs statistical analysis)
Convergent and discriminant validity
reliability
Internal consistency between the questions used to measure one variable
Questions about the topic are related
sampling
Process of selecting a sufficient number of elements from the population, so that results from analysing the sample are generalizable to the population.
population
Entire group of people
Every person working in a specific area
element
Single member of the population
sample
The specific members selected that are to be covered in the research
subject
Every member of the sample is called a subject
sampling techniques
probability sampling
non-probability sampling
probability sampling
The chance of selecting each participant in the population is KNOWN and not zero and equal
has some types of sampling which are
simple random sampling
systematic sampling
stratified random sampling
simple random sampling
Each element has a known and equal chance of being selected. Randomly select participants
Easy to understand - highly generalizable
systematic sampling
Assign a number to every participant in your population
Decide how large your sample size should be
Determine the sample interval
stratified random sampling
Population that includes different categories/groups
Like population includes males/females
two processes for stratifying
proportional
disproportional
proportional stratifying processor
We know the number of each category/stratum (10k students, 8k men, 2k females)
Forced to choose a certain percentage from every category/stratum
disproportional stratifying processor
We don't know the number of each category/stratum
Forced to pick an equal number from every stratum
Will divide the sample size by the number of category
non-probability sampling
Elements don't have a known or equal chance of being selected as subjects
types of non-probability sampling
convenience
purposive
quota
snowball
convenience sampling
distribute the questionnaire for anyone
purposive sampling
target specific people
quota sampling
different groups, no sample frame
snowball sampling
first participant helps bring more participants
how to know which sampling to follow?
Depending on the sample frame, means you have a list of all elements in the population. (having the list of names of an organisation)
validity and reliability
Face validity (no statistical inference)
Content validity (no statistical inference)
Construct validity (needs statistical inference)
Internal Validity (no statistical inference)
External validity (no statistical inferenc
reliability tests
Internal consistency between the items used to measure one variable
Measure based on the correlations between different items on the same tes
Common guidelines for evaluating (cronbach’s alpha)
00 to .69 = poor
70 to .79 = good
80 to .89 = excellent/strong
90 to .99 = Using the same question many times so bad
(don't repeat the same question many times, we need to have different questions to measure one variable, but these questions are related = reliability)
examining the relationship (two types) hypothesis
correlation
regression
correlation
know the relationship between variables
Indicates direction, strength, and significant of relationships among variables
Do a test that will allow us to understand if there is a correlation between two variables without knowing which one causes the other.
Not enough to examine the hypothesis
Rang from -1 to +1
regression
Examine the hypothesis
Coefficient of determination
from 0% to 100%
We know which variable causes the other
the P value (in regression)
To accept hypothesis, the P value has to be less than 0.05
Why? Has something to do with Margin of error and level of confidence
two types of regression
simple
multiple
simple regression
Used when I have one independent variable is hypothesised to affect one dependent
multiple regression
Used when I have more one independent variable to explain the variance in the dependent variable
qualitative data analysis
record the interviews
write the transcript
analyse the transcript
qualitative sample size
Keep sampling until you reach data saturation
Data saturation
At a certain stage of doing the interviews, you are not receiving new ideas
Participants are repeating the same answers
data reduction types (how to analyze)
coding
categorization
coding
Take all the words or ideas you have collected and organise them in a way that it makes sense
Go over the interview, identify common topics or issues and group related responses together
categorization
Putting them into labels
Organise them or classify them so you can easily see how they relate to each other
Putting each response under a specific category for example
braun and clarke (2006)
Become familiar with the data
Read through the data carefully and understand it well
Generate initial codes
Identify and label important features of the data
Search for themes
Group the codes into themes that capture a significant pattern
Review themes
Check if the themes work well with the data
Define themes
Clearly define and name each theme
Write up
Write a detailed report explaining the themes and supporting them with data