1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
The fundamental characteristic of a nation state is
sovereignty
Sovereignty implies that
not only do states enjoy ultimate authority within their territory, and so have supreme decision making + enforcement powers, they also enjoy legal equality w other nation states
sovereign states don’t recognise the authority of?
any supposedly supreme international body
Recognition + respect of state sovereignty impacts on?
most global issues such as attempts to deal w conflict, poverty, human rights, + the environment (CHEP). The idea of the nation state brings together the legal/political entity of a state + the cultural entity of a nation
The 1648 treaty of Westphalia recognised?
the exclusive sovereignty of each state over its lands + people + acts as the basis for the relationship between most sovereign states today
Sovereign states are considered by many to be the?
building blocks of global politics which hold both internal + external sovereignty
Internal sovereignty
The power of a body within the state to make decisions that are binding on individuals + groups in the territory, + the ability to maintain order
What do Max Weber + Joseph Schumpeter say abt internal sovereignty
Philosopher Max Weber describes this as a monopoly over the use of legitimate violence within the state. Political economist Joseph Schumpeter adds to this- a monopoly over the ability to raise taxes within the state
External sovereignty
There is no legal/ political authority above the state
The right of autonomy to make decisions within the territory of the state free form external interference
No state or legal body has the right to intervene in the sovereign affairs of any nation-state
All states are legally equal (regardless of size, population, power, etc)
This that have caused views on state sovereignty to have developed over time
Peace of Westphalia 1638
Fourteen points 1918
Montevideo convention 1933
UN founded 1945
Post-WW2 decolonisation
End of the Cold War 1989/ ‘end of history’ 1992
Peace of Westphalia 1638
Is important in the development of state sovereignty, allowed a state sovereignty over its own affairs, it defined the theory of sovereign equality of states as:
No state has the legal right to intervene in the sovereign affairs of another state
All states, whatever their size, possess the same legal right to independence
Fourteen points 1918
Established the principle that nation-state sovereignty should be founded upon the right of self-determination based on a shared ethnic heritage, led to the creation of new states after WW1
Montevideo convention 1933
Determined that a sovereign state must possess:
A defined territory
A permanent population
A viable govt
The capacity to enter into diplomatic relations w other states
UN founded 1945
The organisation is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its members
No state, however powerful has the right to intervene in the affairs of another state, since all states claim rights to determine policy within their own borders, call states claim equal territorial integrity
The legitimacy of a nation-state also derives from its acceptance as a nation state by other nation state
E.e. Palestinians, Kurds, + Catalans all claim nation-statehood, but since the UN doesn’t accept their claims, they remain unrecognised
Post-WW2 decolonisation
After ww2 old colonial empires were dismantles and new nation-states were established
End of the Cold War 1989/ ‘end of history’ 1992
1989-1991 as communism collapsed thru Easter Europe, new nation states were established upon Wilsonian principles of self-determination
Why state sovereignty is important + what are the implications for global politics
As a cause of conflict- states come into conflict where they disagree over who should have sovereignty over a territory (e.g. Israel - Palestine)
As a basis for international law- the UN grants each member state 1 vote, regardless of size, it upholds the integrity of nation-states against the threat or use of force; and will not intervene in any states' domestic issues
Challenges to state sovereignty
National/ state sovereignty is recognised in most elements of global politics today + states tend to be the major decision makers in global politics + their primacy is recognised in international law w most law being established by + signed by representatives of states. The concept of non-interference still remains although challenges more + more in recent years
The numerous emerging threats to the traditional concept of absolute state sovereignty:
Globalisation
Human rights
Military intervention
Non-state actors
Climate change/ contemporary issues
IGOs
Regionalism
How globalisation is a threat to state sovereignty
the growing interconnectedness of the world in trade, finance + production means that states have less independence than in the past
How human rights are a threat to state sovereignty
the creation of international courts + tribunals such as the ICC means that member states are expected to allow their citizens to be tried by these courts
How military intervention is a threat to state sovereignty
there has been a growing trend towards using military intervention for humanitarian reasons, e.g. in Iraq + Libya. This ignores the wishes of the sovereign states that experience these interventions
How non-state actors are a threat to state sov
such as TNCs + NGOs appear to have a growing role in global politics
How climate change/ contemporary issues are a threat to state sov
climate change is a global issue - states need to work collectively thru treaties like the Paris agreement which was adopted in 2015
How IGOs are a threat to state sov
hundreds of IGOs like the international monetary fund (IMF) have been created since the end of WW2, leading to certain decisions being made at this level instead of at the state level, e.g. the WTO (world trade organisation) imposes trade tariffs to help create stability in world trade
How regionalism is a threat to state sov
the growth across the world of regional organisations like the African union + EU has led to some decision making being transferred from states to a regional body
Evidence for the continued importance of state sovereignty
The principle of non-interference
Military force
Citizenship
National borders
Intergovernmentalism
Lack of a world govt
how the principle of non-interference is evidence for the continued importance of state sov
A key element of the treaty of Westphalia in 1648 was the principle that states shouldn't interfere in the affairs of other states
This allowed them to exercise absolute power within their borders + have independence of action in the international arena
How military force is Evidence for the continued importance of state sovereignty
Most armed forces are still under sovereign control of the state, e.g. the British army, navy + air force were never incorporated into a combined EU military force
States that have nuclear weapons carefully guard their control over them
How citizenship is Evidence for the continued importance of state sovereignty
The power to decide who is + isn't a citizen remains firmly in the control of the govt of sovereign states, e.g. Shamima Begum was a British Citizen who left the UK to join the Islamic state in Syria when she was 15 + the UK govt stripped her of her citizenship on security grounds in 2019
How national borders are Evidence for the continued importance of state sovereignty
Large amounts of time + resources are committed to policing national borders, e.g. Sunak's govt's policy of reducing the no. migrants reaching Britian in 'small boats'
States have also committed significant resources to defending national borders from invasion by other states, e.g. Ukraine defending itself against Russia's 2022 invasion
How intergovernmentalism is Evidence for the continued importance of state sovereignty
IGOs such as the UN follow the principle of intergovernmentalism which gives member states the power to veto resolutions, e.g. Russia + China vetoed a US-sponsored draft of a resolution that called for an immediate + sustained ceasefire in Gaza in March 2024
It limits the power that IGOs have over their member states
If states don't like the policies of an IGO, then they have the power of withdrawing from the IGO, e.g. Brexit
How lack of a world govt is Evidence for the continued importance of state sovereignty
States remain important actors as there has never been a world gov. it can still be argued that there is nothing 'above' the state
A powerful state may be able to act on the international stage w/out fear of any serious consequences, even when their actions are denounced as illegal, e.g. the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 + Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022