chapter 8 justifying sample size

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
call with kaiCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/14

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

15 Terms

1
New cards

a-priori power analysis

A method used before data collection to determine the required sample size to detect an expected effect size with a specified power and alpha level.

2
New cards

goal of a-priori power analysis

To plan for detecting a specified effect size (often a SESOI), not the true unknown effect size.

3
New cards

Smallest Effect Size of Interest (SESOI)

The smallest effect size that is still considered theoretically or practically meaningful.

4
New cards

benefit of planning for precision

You can draw informative conclusions even if the effect is zero, by ruling out large or meaningful effects.

5
New cards

hardest part of planning for precision

Deciding what width of the confidence interval is "precise enough"—this is often subjective.

6
New cards

heuristics for sample size justification

Simple rules like "use 30 participants per group"; problematic because they ignore study-specific context, power, and goals.

7
New cards

explicitly stating ‘no justification’

Encourages transparency, avoids misleading assumptions, and improves scientific integrity—even if it's uncomfortable.

8
New cards

best justification approach (if available)

Using a SESOI, because it ties the study design directly to meaningful, interpretable effects.

9
New cards

why not use effect size from meta-analysis?

They may be inflated due to publication bias and may not generalize to your study context.

10
New cards

why not use effect size from a single study?

Often unreliable and overestimated; high sampling error and context-specific.

11
New cards

compromise power analysis

Used when sample size is fixed; calculates alpha and beta based on a desired error ratio and expected effect size.

12
New cards

post-hoc (retrospective) power analysis

Not informative—just a mathematical function of the p-value; tells you nothing new.

13
New cards

within-subject design advantage

Higher statistical power due to reduced error variance; more efficient than between-subjects design.

14
New cards

sensitivity power analysis

Calculates the smallest effect size that can be detected with a given sample size, alpha, and power.

15
New cards

increase power without increasing sample size

Use within-subjects design, reduce measurement error, strengthen manipulations, use one-sided tests, or include covariates.