chapter 8 justifying sample size

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/14

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

15 Terms

1
New cards

a-priori power analysis

A method used before data collection to determine the required sample size to detect an expected effect size with a specified power and alpha level.

2
New cards

goal of a-priori power analysis

To plan for detecting a specified effect size (often a SESOI), not the true unknown effect size.

3
New cards

Smallest Effect Size of Interest (SESOI)

The smallest effect size that is still considered theoretically or practically meaningful.

4
New cards

benefit of planning for precision

You can draw informative conclusions even if the effect is zero, by ruling out large or meaningful effects.

5
New cards

hardest part of planning for precision

Deciding what width of the confidence interval is "precise enough"—this is often subjective.

6
New cards

heuristics for sample size justification

Simple rules like "use 30 participants per group"; problematic because they ignore study-specific context, power, and goals.

7
New cards

explicitly stating ‘no justification’

Encourages transparency, avoids misleading assumptions, and improves scientific integrity—even if it's uncomfortable.

8
New cards

best justification approach (if available)

Using a SESOI, because it ties the study design directly to meaningful, interpretable effects.

9
New cards

why not use effect size from meta-analysis?

They may be inflated due to publication bias and may not generalize to your study context.

10
New cards

why not use effect size from a single study?

Often unreliable and overestimated; high sampling error and context-specific.

11
New cards

compromise power analysis

Used when sample size is fixed; calculates alpha and beta based on a desired error ratio and expected effect size.

12
New cards

post-hoc (retrospective) power analysis

Not informative—just a mathematical function of the p-value; tells you nothing new.

13
New cards

within-subject design advantage

Higher statistical power due to reduced error variance; more efficient than between-subjects design.

14
New cards

sensitivity power analysis

Calculates the smallest effect size that can be detected with a given sample size, alpha, and power.

15
New cards

increase power without increasing sample size

Use within-subjects design, reduce measurement error, strengthen manipulations, use one-sided tests, or include covariates.