1/15
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
ERIE v. TOMPKINS
IF a case in federal court sits in diversity, THEN the court applies…
(i) federal law to procedural issues
(ii) state law to substantive issues
RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL
When does it apply?
How does a person demand for jury trial?
Legal and Equitable Claims in the Same Case
when the amount in controversy exceeds $20
(i) serve the other parties
(ii) in writing
(iii) “no later than 14 days after the last pleading directed to the issue is served”
(iv) demand is filed w/ the court
IF a case involves both legal claims (eligible for a jury trial) and equitable claims (not eligible for a jury trial), THEN the court (if feasible) must hold a jury trial on the legal claims before holding a nonjury trial on the equitable claims.
VOIR DIRE
How many peremptory challenges does each party get?
How many challenges for cause does each party get?
3 for each side, for any reason (except race or gender)
unlimited
What is the procedure for challenging discriminatory use of a peremptory strikes?
First, the challenger must show a “pattern” of discriminatory peremptory strikes.
Second, the other party must give a “facially neutral” explanation for the strikes.
Third, the challenger must show that this neutral explanation was mere pretext.
JURY INSTRUCTIONS
Request for Jury Instructions
Objections to Jury Instructions
Before or at the close of all evidence, a party may submit proposed jury instructions. After the close of evidence, a party may…
(i) file requests for issues that could not have been reasonably anticipated earlier
(ii) filed untimely requests for instructions on any issue, w/ the court’s permission
A party must object when it is made aware of the jury instructions by the judge. Otherwise, the party loses its right to object later UNLESS there is a plain error which affects a substantial right.
DEFAULT
Definition
Motion for Default Judgment
Entry of Default Judgment
when D fails to file a timely answer with the court
After D defaults, P can move for a default judgment arguing that D didn’t have a good enough reason for failing to answer the complaint.
IF P’s claim is for a “sum certain,” THEN the clerk must enter a default judgment upon P’s request.
IF P’s claim is not for a sum certain, THEN only the judge can enter the default judgment after a hearing. And if the defendant has “appeared” in the action, then they are entitled to a 7-days’ notice of the hearing.
TWO-DISMISSAL RULE
IF there are two voluntary dismissals of the same/related claims, THEN the second voluntary dismissal operates as an adjudication on the merits.
TYPES OF JURY VERDICTS
(i) jury of at least 6 votes unanimously, OR
(ii) parties stipulate otherwise
CHALLENGES TO JURY VERDICTS
After a verdict is returned but before the jury is discharged, the court (upon request OR on its own) may poll the jurors individually.
IF the poll reveals a lack of unanimity or lack of assent, THEN the court may…
(i) direct the jury to deliberate further, OR
(ii) order a new trial
CLAIM PRECLUSION (or RES JUDICATA)
(i) same claims
(ii) same parties
(iii) final judgment
ISSUE PRECLUSION (or COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL)
(i) same issue
(ii) party to be precluded was a party to Lawsuit #1
(iii) actually and necessarily decided
INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW
an appeal in which a ruling by a trial court is appealed while other aspects of the case are proceeding (i.e. review w/o final judgment)
FINAL JUDGMENT RULE
A federal appellate court only has jurisdiction over an appeal from a final judgment on the merits, UNLESS…
(i) collateral issue (e.g. gov’t immunity), OR
(ii) temporary remedy, OR
(iii) interlocutory appeal, OR
(iv) final order w/ multiple parties and claims still pending, OR
(v) order granting/denying JNOV or a new trial
FINAL JUDGMENT
a judgment that…
(i) ends the litigation on the merits (i.e. all claims are resolved)
(ii) leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment
When must an appeal be filed?
within 30 days after entry of the judgment
SCOPE OF APPELLATE REVIEW
trial judge’s factual findings —> clearly erroneous standard
trial judge’s legal rulings —> de novo review
trial judge’s discretionary findings —> abuse of discretion
jury trial —> appellant must have challenged the sufficiency of the evidence w/ a motion for renewed JMOL or motion for a new trial