1/47
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Why would we focus on the soma when trying to understand a neurons computation?
where inputs are combined into one decision variable and where spike threshold
lives, so it captures the core input→decision→spike computation.
What is a neuron's ‘computation’, and how is it represented
electrically?
The transformation of input current patterns into an output spike train / firing rate.
Represented by V(t) dynamics: C_m dV/dt = −ΣI_ion + I_ext.
State the 3 main ions for resting potential and their relative
concentrations.
Na+ — higher outside, lower inside
K+ — higher inside, lower outside
Cl- — higher outside, lower inside
Why does ion movement create current, and why can't ions cross
freely?
Current = net charge flow per time; moving charged ions is a current.
The lipid bilayer core is hydrophobic; ions are charged/hydrated
What is the Nernst equilibrium
The voltage at which electrical and chemical driving forces on that ion balance → zero net flux.
Define membrane potential V_m and how it differs from a single ion's E_ion.
V_m = the actual net voltage from ALL open channels combined.
E_ion = the voltage where just ONE ion's current alone is zero.
Why does V_m settle near −70mV even though no single E_ion equals −70mV?
V_m settles where the SUM of all ionic currents = 0, not where one ion's current alone is zero.
What determines the magnitude and direction of I_ion =
g_ion(V_m−E_ion)?
Magnitude: g_ion (openness) × driving force (V_m−E_ion) (distance from equilibrium).
Direction: sign of driving force alone — V_m > E_ion → outward (+); V_m < E_ion → inward
(−).
Inward current depolarises V_m — how do driving forces/currents change?
V_m−E_K becomes more positive as V rises → outward K+ current increases.
V_m−E_Na becomes less negative → inward Na+ driving force shrinks (at fixed
conductance).
Why is there a time lag between applying current and V_m settling?
The membrane is an RC circuit — the capacitor can't change voltage instantly; charge must accumulate via finite current while some current also leaks away
What does it mean for an ion channel to be 'voltage gated'?
Its open probability (conductance) depends on V_m rather than being fixed.
Which two ions have voltage-gated channels in the standard HH model?
Sodium (Na+) and Potassium (K+).
Relationship between an ion channel's state and its conductance.
Effective conductance = max conductance (all channels open) × fraction currently open
What happens to voltage-gated channels when V_m is near rest?
m (Na+ activation) ≈ 0
n (K+ activation) low.
Both g_Na and g_K small → leak conductance dominates
What does it mean for a membrane to 'depolarise'?
V_m becomes less negative (moves toward 0/positive)
What happens to voltage-gated channels as membrane depolarises?
m rises rapidly (tiny τ_m)
g_Na spikes up
large inward Na+ current (driving force still large, E_Na≈+50mV)
further depolarises V_m: positive feedback = upstroke.
Why does HH need three gating variables (m, n, h) instead of one?
Two channel types (Na+, K+) with independent kinetics; Na+ current is transient (rises then falls even if V stays high) — impossible with one monotonic gate.
Which HH variables are fast (→V) and which are slow (→W)?
Fast → V: membrane potential V, plus m (tiny τ_m, tracks V almost instantly).
Slow → W: h (Na+ inactivation) and n (K+ activation), both much larger time constants.
Why does current I appear only in the fast equation dV/dt =V−V3/3−W+I?
Injected current directly charges the membrane capacitance
Does a limit cycle in the phase diagram mean spiking or resting?
Spiking. A limit cycle is a closed trajectory the system cycles around forever instead of settling to a fixed point
Why doesn't a neuron fire when I is too low, or too high?
Too low: fixed point stays on the left, stable branch — perturbations decay back to rest, no threshold crossing.
Too high: fixed point moves onto the right, stable branch— depolarisation block, no cycling.
Define a bifurcation
A qualitative change in system behaviour as a parameter is varied through a critical value
HH→FN: what's lost ?
Lost: explicit ion-channel identity/interpretability — no separate Na+ activation/inactivation, no way to simulate blocking a specific channel
HH→FN: why do we want the simpler system anyway
2-D systems can be fully analysed via phase-plane/nullclines:
Cheaper to simulate, yet still captures threshold qualitatively.
Map leak / integrate / fire / reset onto Algorithm 1 (LIF)
−(V−V_rest): Leak
R_m·I(t) : Integrate
V≥V_th then S(t)←1: Fire
V←V_reset:Reset
Define the rheobase of a neuron.
The minimum constant input current needed to produce firing/spike
What do x and ReLU(x) represent?
What is the difference between LIF and ReLU?
LIF: Gives spike and firing rate
ReLU: Gives continuous activation
Why are ANNs often interpreted as rate-coding models?
Each ReLU ANN neuron outputs one continuous scalar per pass (not a spike train); information is carried by the value's magnitude
what does HH capture?
explicit biophysics:
real channel types
voltage/time-dependent conductances
What does FN capture?
lumps channels into fast V / slow W:
keeps fast/slow structure and emergent spiking
loses channel-specific detail
What does LIF capture?
one passive linear equation + an imposed threshold-reset rule:
no channel mechanism
no fast/slow split
spike is a discrete event not an emergent voltage excursion
Which part of the neuron carries the AP from soma to synaptic terminal?
The axon.
Define a neurotransmitter.
A chemical messenger released from presynaptic vesicles that diffuses across the synaptic cleft and binds postsynaptic receptors
What does it mean for a synaptic input to be excitatory or inhibitory?
Excitatory: depolarises toward threshold—E_syn above resting/threshold
Inhibitory: hyperpolarises or shunts — E_syn at/below resting potential (e.g. GABA/Cl-)
How can changes in receptor number alter g_syn(t)?
More receptors inserted→ more current flows for the same neurotransmitter release → higher effective max synaptic conductance.
Fewer/lower-efficacy receptors → lower g_syn(t). Because this ceiling itself can change over time
Explain 'fire together, wire together' and how STDP refines it
Basic Hebbian idea: persistent pre/post correlation → synapse strengthens.
STDP adds precise causal timing: pre-before-pos
How does coincident pre/post activity cause a persistent strength change?
Coincident release + strong postsynaptic depolarisation→large Ca2+ influx → signalling cascades (e.g. CaMKII) → more AMPA receptors inserted/higher efficacy→ persistently raised g_syn (LTP)
Which biological synapse property is most closely abstracted by ANN weights?
The (maximum) synaptic conductance / connection strength
Primary problem with pure Hebbian learning, and how BCM fixes it
Pure Hebb: only ever strengthens (positive feedback) → unbounded weight growth, destabilises network.
BCM: sign of plasticity depends on y vs sliding threshold θ_m — y<θ_m → LTD, y>θ_m →LTP — bidirectional and self-limiting.
Why is BCM considered a homeostatic learning mechanism?
θ_m slides with the neuron's own recent average activity avg(y): high avg(y) → θ_m rises →harder to potentiate, easier to depress — pulls activity back down; low avg(y) → opposite
Effect of ↑ extracellular ion concentration on E_ion?
Increases (more positive). Larger [ion]_out/[ion]_in ratio → larger ln term → larger E_ion for a cation.
Which term is the capacitive current in the RC membrane equation?
C_m·dV_m/dt
Role of W in FitzHugh-Nagumo relative to fast variable V?
It acts as a slow recovery variable representing K+ activation and Na+ inactivation
Major limitation of standard unconstrained linear Hebbian
learning?
Weights can grow unbounded toward infinity due to positive feedback.
How does BCM prevent runaway synaptic weight growth?
By introducing a dynamic threshold θ_m that scales with average postsynaptic
activity.
T/F θ_m shifts upward when avg(y) is high, making further LTP harder?
True. The homeostatic sliding-threshold mechanism.