C115: Prisons, Punishment, & Corrections

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/13

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Week 1

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

14 Terms

1
New cards

What did Realignment (AB 109) do?

Shifted responsibility of lower-level offender from state to counties

2
New cards

What prompted Realignment?

Because of ‘80s tough on crime era, there was an increase in inmate violence, death, disease, and more. Thus, the Three-Judge Panel declared CA must decrease prison population by 137.5%.

3
New cards

What percentage capacity were prisons to get down to?

137.5%

4
New cards

What populations did realignment affect?

  1. Lower-level felons

  2. Lower-level releases

  3. Parole violators (biggest pop.) 

5
New cards

What was the impact of realignment on correction? 

It reduced prison population (but not enough), increased probation workload, increased jail populations, and reduced crime rate. 

6
New cards

What is the 3 Strikes law?

Heavily sentences offenders on the 3rd offense; meant to deter people from committing more crimes. 

7
New cards

Prop 47 (2014)

Reclassified low-level, non-violent, non-serious, property & drug offenses to misdemeanors. It was meant to decrease the number of people going into prison & reduced prison and jail populations. 

8
New cards

Prop 57 (2016) 

Allowed parole considerations for non-violent offenders who participated in rehabilitation programs to earn credit to reduce their sentence. It was meant to reduce how long people stayed in prison, and so far hasn’t impacted the population greatly. 

9
New cards
10
New cards
11
New cards
12
New cards
13
New cards
14
New cards