1/65
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Retrenchment
business decides to significantly cut or scale-back its activities.
Retrenchment might occur when one or more of the following happen to a business:
Reduce output & capacity
Job losses / redundancy programmes
Product / market withdrawal
Disposal of business unit
Scaling back planned capital investment
What Are the Causes of Retrenchment?
normally arises from decisions to change strategic direction, which happens because of one or more of the following:
New leadership (usually a new CEO)
Excessively-high costs and low profitability (or unsustainable losses)
Low ROCE
Excessively high gearing (leading to cash flow problems)
Loss of market share
A failed takeover or merger
Economic downturn
Change of ownership
Implications of Retrenchment for Change Management
involves change for a business
- Small-scale, incremental retrenchment has only limited impact
- Significant retrenchment is often associated with a fundamental reappraisal of the business - and therefore with complex and costly change management
- changed organisation structure = higher stress, new teams, different deporting structures
- new leadership = uncertainty, new priorities, new sense of urgency, previous investment abandoned
- fewer people = loss of morale
Organic (Internal) Growth
Organic growth builds on the business' own capabilities and resources
Organic growth involves strategies such as:
- Developing new product ranges
- Launching existing products directly into new international markets (e.g. exporting)
- Opening new business locations - either in the domestic market or overseas
- Investing in additional production capacity or new technology to allow increased output and sales volumes
examples of businesses that have implemented successful organic growth strategies
Dominos UK, Apple and Costa Coffee.
- dominos = rise in number of stores since 2006-2015
- apple = global sales grown
- costa = costa outlets and stores grown since 2008-2015
Benefits and Drawbacks of Organic Growth
Less risk than external growth (e.g. takeovers)
Can be financed through internal funds (e.g. retained profits)
Builds on a business' strengths (e.g. brands, customers)
Allows the business to grow at a more sensible rate
Drawbacks of Organic Growth
Growth achieved may be dependent on the growth of the overall market
Hard to build market share if business is already a leader
Slow growth - shareholders may prefer more rapid growth
Franchises (if used) can be hard to manage effectively
Integration
When two businesses are brought together through a merger or takeover
types - forward, horizontal, vertical, backwards
Backward vertical integration
This involves acquiring a business operating earlier in the supply chain - e.g. a retailer buys a wholesaler, a brewer buys a hop farm
Conglomerate (vertical) integration
This involves the combination of firms that are involved in unrelated business activities
Forward vertical integration
This involves acquiring a business further up in the supply chain - e.g. a vehicle manufacturer buys a car parts distributor
Benefits of Vertical Integration
securing critical supplies,
lowering costs,
improving quality,
facilitating scheduling and planning,
facilitating investments in specialized assets
greater share profit
greater investment in customer needs
barrier to potential competitors
examples of vertical integration
november 2015 apple bus star wars motion capture company faceshift
november 2015 ikea bus romanian baltic forests to control raw materials
Horizontal Integration
Type of monopoly where a company buys out all of its competition. Ex. Rockefeller
merges or takesover those around them
Vertical Integration
the combination in one company of two or more stages of production normally operated by separate companies.
forwards - shops
backwards - suppliers
Horizontal integration
businesses in the same industry and which operate at the same stage of the production process are combined.
benefits- achieve economies of scale
buying well known brand is cheaper
wide range of products
cost synergies-savings-from the rationalisation of business
examples of horizontal integrations
december 2015- dominos buys german pizza chain for 86m
november 2015 - mariotts hotel mergers with sheraton hotels to create worlds biggest hotel chains
Takeovers
involves one business acquiring control of another business
external growth
Reasons for Undertaking Takeovers
Increase market share
Acquire new skills
Access economies of scale
Secure better distribution
Acquire intangible assets (brands, patents, trade marks)
Spread risks by diversifying
Overcome barriers to entry to target markets
Defend itself against a takeover threat
Enter new segments of an existing market
Eliminate competition
Why Might Takeovers Be Preferred to Organic Growth?
Existing products are in the later stages of their life cycles, making it hard to grow organically
The business (in particularly its management) lacks expertise or resources to develop organically
Speed of growth is a high priority
Competitors enjoy significant advantages that are hard to overcome other than acquiring them!
The Risks of Takeovers
highest risk method of growth.
they consistently show that a large percentage of takeovers destroy value for the shareholders of the acquiring firm
most fail
common drawbacks of takeovers include:
High cost involved - with the takeover price often proving too high
Problems of valuation (see the price too high, above)
Upset customers and suppliers, usually as a result of the disruption involved
Problems of integration (change management), including resistance from employees
Incompatibility of management styles, structures and culture
Questionable motives
Why Takeovers Fail
Price paid for takeover was too high (over-estimate of synergies)
Lack of decisive change management in the early stages
The takeover was mishandled
Cultural incompatibility between the two businesses
Poor communication, particularly with management, employees and other stakeholders of the acquired business
Loss of key personnel & customers post acquisition
Competitors take the opportunity to gain market share whilst the takeover target is being integrated
Synergy
concept associated with external growth. Synergy happens when the value of two businesses brought together is higher than the sum of the value of the two
1+1 = more than 2
two main kinds of synergy:
Cost synergy: where cost savings are achieved as a result of external growth
Revenue synergy: where additional revenues are achieved as a result of external growth
Cost Synergies
When two businesses are combined there is often significant scope for achieving cost savings. These might include:
Eliminating duplicated functions & services (e.g. combining the two accounting departments)
Getting better deals from suppliers - which might be possible if combining two businesses gives them improved bargaining power
Higher productivity & efficiency from shared assets: can capacity utilisation of the combined businesses be improved, perhaps by closing down spare capacity?
Example of successful cost synergies:
Back in 2004, investors and analysts were doubtful that Santander would be able to achieve its plan of stripping £300 million of costs from Abbey National which it bought for £9.6bn. Santander delivered the £300 million of cost synergies a year ahead of schedule.
Revenue Synergies
Potential revenue synergies include:
Marketing and selling complementary products
Cross-selling into a new customer base
Sharing distribution channels
Access to new markets (e.g. through existing expertise of the takeover target)
Reduced competition
The Crucial Role of Synergy in Takeovers and Mergers
The primary objective of any takeover is to create value for shareholders that exceeds the cost of the acquisition
Synergies represent the extra value that can be created from the takeover
how synergy works - look at the example
For example, consider a business valued at £10 million by the market (e.g. from the market capitalisation on the stock market).
A buyer comes along and, after negotiation and due diligence, agrees to pay £13 million to complete the takeover. The buyer has paid a bid premium of 30% (or £3 million) to complete the takeover.
The shareholders of the target business are happy. But the shareholders of the buyer business will need to be convinced that the price was worth paying. They have had to pay £3 million over the apparent value of the business to achieve the takeover.
How can the bid premium be justified? Only if the takeover achieves synergies worth at least £3 million in value terms (e.g. the NPV of future synergies).
Mergers
two previously separate firms which is achieved by forming a completely new business
Some Examples of Mergers
2010: British Airways and Iberia merge to form IAG
2015: Paddy Power and Betfair merge to form Paddy Power Betfair
2015: H.J. Heinz Company & Kraft Foods Group merge to form The Kraft Heinz Company
Joint Ventures
separate business entity created by two or more parties, involving shared ownership
different from takeovers and mergers in that the risks and returns of the business formed as the joint venture are shared by the parties involved. Usually this is a 50:50 share
EXAMPLE uber and volvo 350 million dollars voint together to create driverless cars/taxis
The parties involved in a joint venture are usually looking to benefit from complementary strengths and resources brought to the venture
Potential Benefits of Using Joint Ventures as a Method of Growth
JV partners benefit from each other's expertise and resources (e.g. market knowledge, customer base, distribution channels, R&D expertise)
Each JV partner might have the option to acquire in the future the JV business based on agreed terms if it proves successful
Reduces the risk of a growth strategy - particularly if it involves entering a new market or diversification
Potential Drawbacks of Using Joint Ventures as a Method of Growth
Risk of a clash of organisational cultures - particularly in terms of management style
The objectives of each JV partner may change, leading to a conflict of objectives with the other
In practice, there turns out to be an imbalance in levels of expertise, investment or assets brought into the venture by the different partners
Strategies for Expanding into International Markets - Selling into international markets is increasingly attractive for UK businesses. For example because of:
Stronger economic growth in emerging economies such as China, India, Brazil and Russia (BRICs) and Malaysia, Indonesia, Nigeria & Turkey (MINT)
Market saturation and maturity (slow or declining sales) in domestic markets
Easier to reach international customers using e-commerce
Greater government support for businesses wishing to expand overseas
The main methods of investing in international markets are:
Exporting direct to international customers - The UK business takes orders from international customers and ships them to the customer destination
Selling via overseas agents or distributors - A distribution or agency contract is made with one or more intermediaries
Distributors & agents may buy stock to service local demand
The customer is owned by the distributor or agent
Opening an operation overseas - Involves physically setting up one or more business locations in the target markets
Initially may just be a sales office - potentially leading onto production facilities (depends on product)
Joint venture or buying a business overseas - The business acquires or invests in an existing business that operates in the target market
business looking at international expansion needs to consider some specific risk factors:
Cultural differences: a business needs to understand local cultural influences in order to sell its products effectively. For example, a product may be viewed as a basic commodity at home, but not in the target overseas market. The sales and marketing approach will need to reflect this.
Language issues: although the common business language worldwide is now English, there could still be language issues. Can the business market its product effectively in the local language? Will it have access to professional translators and marketing agencies?
Legislation: legislation varies widely in overseas markets and will affect how to sell into them. A business must make sure it adheres to local laws. It will also need to consider how to find and select partners in overseas countries, as well as how to investigate the freight and communications options available
Exporting direct to international customers - adv
Uses existing systems - e.g. e-commerce
Online promotion makes this cost-effective
Can choose which orders to accept
Direct customer relationship established
Entire profit margin remains with the business
Can choose basis of payment - e.g. terms, currency, delivery options etc
Exporting direct to international customers - disadv
Potentially bureaucratic
No direct physical contact with customer
Risk of non-payment
Customer service processes may need to be extended (e.g. after-sales care in foreign languages)
Selling via overseas agents or distributors - adv
Agent of distributor should have specialist market knowledge and existing customers
Fewer transactions to handle
Can be cost effective - commission or distributor margin is a variable cost, not fixed
Selling via overseas agents or distributors - disadv
Loss of profit margin
Unlikely to be an exclusive arrangement - question mark over agent and distributor commitment & effort
Harder to manage quality of customer service
Agent / distributor keeps the customer relationship
Opening an operation overseas - adv
Local contact with customers & suppliers
Quickly gain detailed insights into market needs
Direct control over quality and customer service
Avoids tariff barriers
Opening an operation overseas - disadv
Significant cost & investment of management time
Need to understand and comply with local legal and tax issues
Higher risk
Joint venture or buying a business overseas - adv
Popular way of entering emerging markets
Reduced risk - shared with joint venture partner
Buying into existing expertise and market presence
Joint venture or buying a business overseas - disadv
Joint ventures often go wrong - difficult to exit too
Risk of buying the wrong business or paying too much for the business
Competitor response may be strong
Innovation can come in many forms:
Improving or replacing business processes to increase efficiency and productivity, or to enable the business to extend the range or quality of existing products and/or services
Developing entirely new and improved products and services - often to meet rapidly changing customer or consumer demands or needs
Adding value to existing products, services or markets to differentiate the business from its competitors and increase the perceived value to the customers and markets
Intrapreneurship
involves people within a business creating or discovering new business opportunities
examples of products that were the result of intrapreneurial activity are:
Gmail (Google) = Employees at Google are allowed time for personal projects. Some of Google's best projects come out of their 20 percent time policy. One of these was Gmail, launched on 1 April 2004
PlayStation (Sony) = Ken Kutaragi, a relatively junior Sony Employee, spent hours tinkering with his daughters Nintendo to make it more powerful and user friendly. What came from his work turned into one of the world's most recognisable brands - the Sony PlayStation
Potential business benefits of intrapreneurship
In addition to identifying and executing new business opportunities, intrapreneurs can help drive innovation within businesses
What can a business do to encourage intrapreneurship?
Look out for - and encourage - entrepreneurial activity
Give employees ownership of projects
Make risk-taking and failure acceptable
Train employees in innovation
Give employees time outside the confines of their job description
Encourage networking & collaboration
Reward entrepreneurial thinking and activity
Some reasons why large businesses are not entrepreneurial
Complacency / arrogance
Bureaucracy (stifling initiative)
Reward systems do not provide an incentive to innovate
Short-termism (discouraging long-term thinking or risk-taking)
reason for operating overseas - Cost reduction
ncreasingly skilled labour is available at lower cost, which encourages businesses looking to reduce their cost base without compromising customer service.
To put the advantage of low-wage economies into perspective, the hourly cost of labour in India and China is around 5% of the cost of equivalent labour hours in economies like the UK and Germany. A business that has a labour-intensive production process is bound to be attracted by the potential cost savings
A decision to operate overseas raises several more issues for a business:
Exchange rates - Operating in another country almost certainly exposes a business to the effects of fluctuating exchange rates.
Trade barriers - locating a business to avoid trade barriers is certainly important for businesses looking to compete effectively. Common types of trade barrier include quotas, tariffs on imported goods and government subsidies for domestic industries.
The European Union is an example of a free trade area
Political stability - Most developed economies enjoy relative political stability - i.e. there are no sudden or dramatic changes in the political landscape which impact on businesses.
Offshoring
relocation of business activities from the home country to a different international location.
Offshoring has traditionally been associated with the relocation of manufacturing activities from a domestic economy overseas
The Difference between Offshoring and Outsourcing
Offshoring is about WHERE the work is done.
Outsourcing is about WHO does the work.
offshoring involves changing the international location of WHERE work is done for or by a business.
Outsourcing involves changing WHO does work for a business - away from the business itself to an external supplier.
Key Reasons for Offshoring
To access lower manufacturing costs (particularly in emerging markets which enjoy the advantage of lower labour costs)
To access potentially better skilled & higher quality supply
To makes use of existing capacity overseas
To take advantage of free trade areas and avoid protectionism
To make it easier to supply target international markets (where it is important to be located in, or near to, those markets)
Potential Drawbacks to Offshoring
Longer lead times for supply & risks of poorer quality
Implications for CSR (harder to control aspects of operating long distances away from the home country)
Additional management costs (time, travel)
Impact of exchange rates (potentially significant)
Communication: language & time zones
Reshoring
involves a business returning production or operations to the host country that had previously been moved to a different international location.
Reasons for Reshoring
Greater certainty around delivery times (including shorter delivery times)
Minimising risk of supply chain disruptions
Reducing the complexity of the supply chain
Making it easier to collaborate with home-based suppliers
Getting greater certainty about the quality of inputs and components
Recognising that the cost advantage of producing or sourcing overseas is not as significant as it used to be (particularly in China where unit labour costs have risen significantly in recent years).
Bartlett & Ghoshal Model of International Strategy
strategic options for businesses wanting to manage their international operations based on two pressures: local responsiveness & global integration.
Force for local responsiveness = Do customers in each country expect the product to be adapted to meet local requirements
Force for global integration = How important is standardisation of the product in order to operate efficiently (e.g. economies of scale)
barlett and ghosal - global strategy
pressure for local responsivness = low
pressure for global integration = high
key features = highly centralised
focus on efficiency
little sharing of expertise
standardised products
examples = cat and pfizer
global - standardised product sold around the world
barlett and ghosal - transnational strategy
pressure for local rsponisvness = high
pressure for global integration = high
key features = complex to achieve
aim to maximise local responsivness but also gain benefits from global integration
wide sharing of expertise
examples = unilever and starbucks
transnational - highly responsive to local markets but business shares expertise and knowledge
barlett and ghosal - international strategy
pressure for local response = low
pressure for global integration = low
key features = aims to achieve efficiency by focusing on domestic activities
international operations are managed centrally
relitavley little adaption of product to local needs
examples = mcdonalds
ups
international strategy - products produced for domestic markets some alterations to fit into the international markets
barlett and ghosal - multi domestic strategy
pressure for local responsivness = high
pressure for global intergration = low
key features = aims to maximise benefits of meeting local markets through extensive customisation
decision making decentralised
local businesses treated as seperate businesses
strategies for each country
examples = nestle and mtv
multi domestic - products and services tailored for local markets