1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Barron v. Baltimore (1833)
Issue: City of Baltimore graded roads and diverted some waterways, ruining Barron’s wharf. Barron sued under the 5th Amendment for just compensation and due process of the law. Ruling: For Baltimore. Bill of rights applied to national government only
Gitlow v. New York (1925)
Issue: Gitlow was spreading pamphlets for violent overthrow of the government
Ruling: For New York. Used 14th amendment to block this exercise of free speech
Schneck v. US (1919)
Issue: Schenck was passing out anti-war leaflets during war time (issue of free speech)
Ruling: For the U.S, this case limited the scope of free speech
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
Issue: Brandenburg was a KKK leader who spread violent speech
Ruling: For Ohio. Brandenburg's speech had no socially redeeming value, court limited the definition of free speech with socially redeeming value
New York Times v. Sullivan (1964)
Issue: NYT was sued by Sullivan because they posted a defamatory article about him
Ruling: For New York Times. Established libel and slander rules, the article was not malicious
Miller v. California (1973)
Issue: Miller was sued for selling pornographic material in an adult store
Ruling: For Miller. Local community standings should determine what is appropriate to sell.
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942)
Issue: Chaplinsky called a police officer a "godamned racketeer"
Ruling: For New Hampshire. Court defined Chaplinsky's actions as "fighting words" to incite violence
Liquormart v. Rhode Island (1946)
Issue: Liquormart was advertising prices of alcohol
Ruling: For Liquormart, Inc. Now only misleading advertising can be struck down
US v. Nixon (1974)
Issue: Nixon refused to turn over tapes of oval office conversations, citing executive privelege.
Ruling: For the US, even the president is subject to judicial
subpoena for material relevant to criminal prosecution.
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)
Issue: court determined that certain state programs
that provide direct aid to parochial and/or religious schools were
unconstitutional.
Ruling: This case established the Lemon Test, which is a
three-part test to determine whether the funds or involvement
seeks a secular purpose, which is unconstitutional
Employment Division v. Smith (1990)
Issue: Native Americans were fired for smoking peyote during a
religious ceremony during a break at work. They were then
denied their unemployment benefits
Ruling: For the employment division. The court discarded the
compelling interest test and allowed the state of Oregon to deny unemployment benefits.
City of Boerne v. Flores (1997)
Overturned part of the Religious Freedom and Restoration Act that breached the 14th amendment
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988)
Ruled that public schools may censor student publications, such as school newspaper articles.
Dred Scott v. Sanford (1856)
Ruled that African Americans could not be American citizens and that Congress had no power to ban slavery in federal territories