Rhetorical Devices and Logical Fallacies Explained

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/27

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

28 Terms

1
New cards

Slanters

Rhetorical devices that use emotionally charged language to influence an audience's perception without presenting a logical argument.

2
New cards

Euphemism

A mild or less negative term used to soften the impact of something unpleasant.

3
New cards

Dysphemism

A harsh or more negative term used to intensify the impact of something.

4
New cards

Rhetorical Analogy

A comparison designed to evoke an emotional response rather than provide a logical argument.

5
New cards

Rhetorical Definition

Defining a term in a way that conveys a biased attitude.

6
New cards

Rhetorical Explanation

Explaining an event or situation in a way that conveys a biased attitude.

7
New cards

Innuendo

An indirect or subtle observation that implies something negative.

8
New cards

Loaded Question

A question that contains a controversial or unjustified assumption.

9
New cards

Ridicule/Sarcasm

Mocking language intended to belittle or criticize.

10
New cards

Hyperbole

Exaggerated statements not meant to be taken literally.

11
New cards

Downplayers

Words or phrases used to make something seem less important.

12
New cards

Truth Surrogates

Hints that something is true without providing evidence.

13
New cards

Weaseler

Words or phrases that weaken a statement, making it less definitive.

14
New cards

Logical Fallacies

Flaws in reasoning that weaken arguments.

15
New cards

Ad Hominem

Attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself.

16
New cards

Straw Man

Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack.

17
New cards

False Dilemma (Either/Or)

Presenting two options as the only possibilities when others exist.

18
New cards

Red Herring

Introducing irrelevant information to distract from the actual issue.

19
New cards

Slippery Slope

Arguing that a small first step will inevitably lead to a chain of related (negative) events.

20
New cards

Ad Populum (Bandwagon)

Arguing that something is true or right because many people believe it.

21
New cards

Ad Misericordiam (Appeal to Pity)

Using pity to persuade rather than logical reasons.

22
New cards

Ad Baculum (Appeal to Fear)

Using threats or fear to persuade.

23
New cards

Begging the Question

Assuming the conclusion in the premises; circular reasoning.

24
New cards

Hasty Generalization

Making a broad claim based on limited evidence.

25
New cards

Post Hoc (False Cause)

Assuming that because one event followed another, it was caused by it.

26
New cards

Genetic Fallacy

Judging something as good or bad based on its origin.

27
New cards

Appeal to Authority

Believing a claim is true because an authority figure endorses it, without evaluating the evidence.

28
New cards

Appeal to Tradition

Arguing that something is true or right because it has always been done that way.