POSC101 Midterm PT 4: Political Parties and Theories

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/26

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

27 Terms

1
New cards

Aldrich: Why Parties Exist

Parties are endogenous institutions — created by politicians to serve their interests (not external constraints imposed on them).

2
New cards

1st problem parties solve

Social Choice Problem: Aggregating preferences into stable collective decisions (avoiding cycling, instability)

3
New cards

2nd problem parties solve

Collective Action Problem: Coordinating behavior, overcoming free-riding, pooling resources

4
New cards

3rd problem parties solve

Ambition Problem: Helping politicians achieve career goals (fundraising, electoral support, advancement)

5
New cards

Conditional Party Government (CPG) Theory

Party strength is conditional on member preferences.

6
New cards

1st key conditions for Strong Parties:

High intra-party homogeneity — Members within each party agree on policy

7
New cards

2nd key condition for strong parties 

High inter-party heterogeneity — Parties are far apart ideologically

8
New cards

What is the result of the two key conditions for strong parties?

Members delegate power to party leaders.

9
New cards

Why delegate? When both conditions met:

  • Leaders share members’ preferences (low risk of shirking)

  • Stakes are high (parties far apart = bad outcomes if you lose)

  • Coordination needed to win fights

  • Benefits of delegation outweigh costs

10
New cards

CPG Explains Historical Variation: 1950s-1970s: Weak Parties

  • Southern Democrats conservative

  • Northern Democrats liberal

  • = Low intra-party homogeneity

  • Members didn’t delegate to leaders

11
New cards

CPG Explains Historical Variation: 1980s-Present: Growing Party Strength

  • Party sorting (realignment)

  • Each party internally unified

  • = High homogeneity + heterogeneity

  • Members delegate to strong leaders

12
New cards

Cartel Theory (Cox and McCubbins)

Majority party uses procedural control to protect its collective “brand” through a procedural cartel (a monopoly on the procedure).

13
New cards

Negative Agenda Control

Preventing bills that would divide or embarrass the party from reaching the floor for a vote.

14
New cards

How the Cartel Works: 1st Gatekeeper

Speaker of the House: sets floor schedule, recognize members, refers bills

15
New cards

How the Cartel Works: 2nd Gatekeeper

Rules Committee: determines debate terms for each bill (Speaker appoints members)

16
New cards

How the Cartel Works: 3rd Gatekeeper

Committee Chairs: Control committee agendas (all majority party members)

17
New cards

Evidence:

Majority party loses less than 5% of floor votes (“roll rates”) because damaging bulls never come up.

18
New cards

CPG Theory; When strong?

When preference conditions met

19
New cards

CPG Theory; Main power

Positive agenda control (pass bills)

20
New cards

CPG Theory; Emphasis 

Variation in party strength 

21
New cards

CPG Theory; Mechanism

Delegation to leaders

22
New cards

Cartel Theory; When strong?

Always (brand protection)

23
New cards

Cartel Theory; Main power

Negative agenda control (block bills) 

24
New cards

Cartel Theory; Emphasis

Baseline party power

25
New cards

Cartel Theory; Mechanism

Procedural gatekeeping

26
New cards

Synthesis: 

Both theories are complimentary and help explain today’s Congress. Cartel provides baseline gatekeeping power (always present); CPG explains variation in positive leadership and discipline (conditional on preferences).

27
New cards

How do CPG and Cartel compliment each other?

CPG explains why leaders get power.
Cartel Theory explains how they use that power to maintain control and unity.