HL EXTENSION - Memory

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/34

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

35 Terms

1
New cards

What is one cognitive process affected by digital technology?

Memory

2
New cards

How is memory defined in cognitive psychology?

The capacity to encode, store, and retrieve information.

3
New cards

What is ADHD?

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, characterized by inattention and hyperactivity.

4
New cards

How is ADHD linked to working memory?

ADHD is associated with impairments in working memory, often due to cognitive overload.

5
New cards

What technologies are commonly used in everyday life that may affect memory?

Online videos, laptops, games, social media, and search engines.

6
New cards

How can video games help children with ADHD?

They can exercise visual working memory and improve cognitive performance over time.

7
New cards

What was the aim of Klingberg (2005)?

To test the effects of computer game training on working memory and attention in children with ADHD.

8
New cards

What type of study was Klingberg (2005)?

True experiment

9
New cards

What were the two experimental conditions in Klingberg’s study?

  • Group 1: Game designed to improve working memory (difficulty increased).

  • Group 2: Same game, but not designed to stretch working memory capacity.

10
New cards

What was the procedure of the Klingberg study?

Children played games for ~40 minutes/day, 5 days/week. They were tested after 5 weeks and again after 3 months.

11
New cards

What were the results of the Klingberg study?

Group 1 showed significant improvement in working memory and reduced symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity.

12
New cards

What are two strengths of Klingberg’s study?

  1. High ecological validity (played in natural settings).

  2. Longitudinal design tested both short- and long-term effects.

13
New cards

What are three weaknesses of Klingberg’s study?

  1. Small sample size (only 40 children).

  2. Risk of fatigue due to task repetition.

  3. Potential parental bias in reporting symptom improvement.

14
New cards

What is the Levels of Processing theory (Craik & Lockhart)?

Information processed semantically (deeply) is remembered better than information processed structurally (superficially).

15
New cards

How does notetaking method affect memory according to this theory?

  • Handwritten notes → Semantic (deep) processing.

  • Laptop notes → Structural (shallow) processing.

16
New cards

What was the aim of Mueller & Oppenheimer’s study?

To see if laptop vs. handwritten notetaking affects academic performance and memory.

17
New cards

What type of study was it? (Mueller)

Quasi experiment

18
New cards

What was the sample? (Mueller)

Male and female university students.

19
New cards

What was the procedure of the study?

  • Participants took notes during a TED Talk using their normal method (laptop or hand).

  • 30 minutes later, they answered factual and conceptual questions.

20
New cards

What were the results of Mueller & Oppenheimer’s study?

  • No difference in factual recall between groups.

  • Handwritten note-takers performed better on conceptual questions.

21
New cards

What are two strengths of the study of Mueller?

  1. Reflected participants’ natural notetaking styles.

  2. Standardized and replicable design.

22
New cards

What are two weaknesses of Mueller?

  1. Low generalizability—only university students were tested.

  2. Participant variability—e.g., smarter students may prefer handwriting.

23
New cards

What is transactive memory?

Knowing where information can be found and how to access it rather than remembering the information itself.

24
New cards

What is the "Google Effect" (or digital amnesia)?

The tendency to forget information that can be easily retrieved online.

25
New cards

What was the aim of Sparrow (2011)?

To test how belief in future access to information affects memory recall.

26
New cards

What type of study was it? (sparrow)

A true experiment using a 2x2 independent sample design.

27
New cards

What was the sample? (Sparrow)

University students (male and female).

28
New cards

What were the 4 experimental groups? (sparrow)

  • Told info would be saved + told to remember

  • Told info would be saved + not told to remember

  • Told info would be erased + told to remember

  • Told info would be erased + not told to remember

29
New cards

What was the procedure? (sparrow)

Participants typed trivia facts and were told different storage and memory instructions, then tested on recall.

30
New cards

What were the results? (sparrow)

  • Being told to remember → no effect.

  • Believing info was saved → significantly reduced recall.

31
New cards

What does Sparrow’s study show?

Reliance on digital storage can weaken memory because people make less effort to remember information.

32
New cards

What are two strengths of the study? (sparrow)

  1. Lab experiment allowed high control and replicability.

  2. Standardized design ensures reliability.

33
New cards

What are three weaknesses of the study? (Sparrow)

  1. Low ecological validity—lab setting using trivia facts.

  2. Low generalizability—only Harvard students.

  3. No control for prior knowledge of trivia facts.

34
New cards

Why should claims about brain-training tech be scrutinized?

Because companies may make exaggerated claims; one major company was sued and fined $2 million for false advertising.

35
New cards

What caution does this provide for interpreting research?

Even though some studies show positive effects, it’s important to critically evaluate all evidence before drawing strong conclusions.