Lecture 2: Utility, Preferences & indifference Curves

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/22

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 8:58 PM on 9/4/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

23 Terms

1
New cards

Topic 1: Modeling Consumer Behavior

2
New cards

Consumption Bundles

A combination of 2 or more items, also called a “basket”

3
New cards

What do we assume about consumption bundles

1) People know what they like and can rank all possible consumption bundles by preference.

2)They pick the best bundle out of what they can afford.

4
New cards

Topic 2: Utility

5
New cards

Utility

A numerical score describing the amount of satisfaction one gets from a consumption bundle

6
New cards

Utility function

A mathematical formula that assigns a level of utility to all consumption bundles

7
New cards

Jeremy Benthams Assumptions About Utility (4)

1) Utility can be measured (units of measurement= utils)

2) We can compare and add up peoples utility

3) Society is better off when it maximizes overall happiness

4) for individuals: U= f(income)

8
New cards

U= f(income) graphically

knowt flashcard image
9
New cards

Marginal Utility (mu)

  • Intuition: For every unit increase in income, how much does your utility increase

  • Formula: mu= slope of above graph= first derivative = du/di

  • Graphically: du/di >0 because the slope is always


<ul><li><p><u>Intuition:</u> For every unit increase in income, how much does your utility increase</p></li><li><p><u>Formula</u>: mu= slope of above graph= first derivative = du/di</p></li><li><p><u>Graphically:</u> du/di &gt;0 because the slope is always </p></li></ul><p></p>
10
New cards

Diminishing Marginal Utility

  • Intuition: As individuals become more and more wealthy, the amount of utility they get from an increase in income begins to increase at a significantly lower rate; for example, the lifestyles of someone with 2.5 billion versus 2 billion would not vary so much, satisfaction-wise, because both people could reasonably afford everything they want.

  • Formula: this is exhibited by the second derivative (the rate at which the slope changes)- since the slope is decreasing the second derrivative will always be negative: d2u/ d2i < 0

  • Graphically: reference image


<ul><li><p><u>Intuition:</u> As individuals become more and more wealthy, the amount of utility they get from an increase in income begins to increase at a significantly lower rate; for example, the lifestyles of someone with 2.5 billion versus 2 billion would not vary so much, satisfaction-wise, because both people could reasonably afford everything they want. </p></li><li><p><u>Formula</u>: this is exhibited by the second derivative (the rate at which the slope changes)- since the slope is decreasing the second derrivative will always be negative: d<sup>2</sup>u/ d<sup>2</sup>i &lt; 0</p></li><li><p><u>Graphically:</u> reference image</p></li></ul><p></p>
11
New cards

Historical Context: Shifting Ideas of Utility

  • 19th century economists liked the idea of diminishing marginal utility but suggested that people get utility out of the goods they consume with their income, not just their income itself.

  • Formula: U= f(good1, good2, good3, ….)


12
New cards

The equimarginal principle

Intuition

  • Mathematical rule for choosing the consumption bundle that maximizes utility,

  • Maximum satisfaction is obtained when an individual gets the same amount of satisfaction from the last unit of money spent on each commodity.

Formula

  • Reference image


<p>Intuition</p><ul><li><p>Mathematical rule for choosing the consumption bundle that maximizes utility,</p></li><li><p><u>Maximum satisfaction</u> is obtained when an individual gets the <u>same amount of satisfaction from the last unit of money spent on each commodity. </u></p></li></ul><p>Formula</p><ul><li><p>Reference image</p></li></ul><p></p>
13
New cards

Equimarginal Principle Practice Problem

knowt flashcard image
14
New cards

Ordinal v. Cardinal Utility

  • When it comes to comparing the utility of differing consumption bundles ordinal utility (ordering things) rather than cardinal utility (utils of satisfaction/ magnitude).

  • Example of ordinal versus cardinal utility: see image


<ul><li><p>When it comes to comparing the utility of differing consumption bundles <strong>ordinal utility</strong> (ordering things) rather than <strong>cardinal utility</strong> (utils of satisfaction/ magnitude). </p></li><li><p>Example of ordinal versus cardinal utility: see image</p></li></ul><p></p>
15
New cards

Why is ordinal utility preferred?

  • Ordinal Utility is the weaker assumption; however, it allows us to make “monotonic transformations”

    • A way of changing a set of numbers to a new set while keeping the same ordering from least to greatest.

    • see example photo


<ul><li><p>Ordinal Utility is the weaker assumption; however, it allows us to make <mark data-color="yellow" style="background-color: yellow; color: inherit;">“monotonic transformations”</mark></p><ul><li><p>A way of changing a set of numbers to a new set while keeping the same ordering from least to greatest.</p></li><li><p>see example photo</p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
16
New cards

TOPIC 3:Assumptions about Indifference Curves (preferences)

1) Completeness

2) Transitivity

3) Non-satiation

4) DMRS

17
New cards

1) Completeness

For any bundles A and B, A is preferred to B (A>B), or B>A, or B~A. In other words you have complete information about the preference regarding the bundles.

18
New cards

2) Transivity

For bundles A, B, & C

  • If A > B

  • B > C

  • A > C


19
New cards

3) Non-satiation

  • Non-satiation- an individual always prefers more of a good or service rather than less.


20
New cards

How does non-satiation justify why IC’s never slope upward

knowt flashcard image
21
New cards

How does non-satiation and transitivity justify why IC’s never cross?

knowt flashcard image
22
New cards

4) Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution (DMRS)

Marginal Rate of Substitution:

  • Intuitively: MRS= the amount of good Y that you’d be willing to give up in order to get one more unit of good X.

  • Formulaically: MRS= absolute value of the slope of IC= -dy/dx along IC.


Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution (DMRS):

  • The slope of the IC gets flatter as x increases; the implications of this are that IC’s are smooth and convex, and averages are preferred to extremes (see red line in attached image).


<p>Marginal Rate of Substitution:</p><ul><li><p>Intuitively: MRS= the amount of good Y that you’d be willing to give up in order to get one more unit of good X. </p></li><li><p>Formulaically: MRS= absolute value of the slope of IC= -dy/dx along IC. </p></li></ul><p></p><p>Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution (DMRS):</p><ul><li><p>The slope of the IC gets flatter as x increases; the implications of this are that IC’s are smooth and convex, and averages are preferred to extremes (see red line in attached image).</p></li></ul><p></p>
23
New cards

Topic 4: MRS and Marginal Utility (mu) relationship

knowt flashcard image