Chapter 6 - Short term and working memory

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/22

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

23 Terms

1
New cards

What is memory?

  • the process of using the info obtained from the past to generate some cognitive function in the present

  • process: encoding, storage, retrieval

2
New cards

Mechanisms of memory

Encoding

  • the initial info processing so its represented in the nervous system

Storage

  • information encoded by the nervous system remains encoded in some form for a longer duration then immediate processing.

Retrieval

  • being able to cognitively access stored info for a given purpose

*if smthn is not encoded in the nervous system, it can never be remembered. 

3
New cards

Measures of memory. Duration and Capacity

capacity

  • how much info a memory system can hold

  • certain types of memory can process more or less info compared to others

  • STM<LTM

duration

  • how long information remains in a memory system

  • some types of info are lost very quickly from memory while others are retained for a lifetime 

  • childhood phone number>this mornings breakfast

4
New cards

The Multistore model of memory. Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968).

5
New cards

Stage 1: Sensory Memory

Function: briefly stores the info just encoded by sensory organs

purpose: holds memory in place before it is selected by attention and passed to STM. 

*following sensory perception, info is retained for a brief period. 

6
New cards

Sensory memory: Persistence of vision

  • you can directly see info that enters the eye moments ago

  • moving objects are perceived as speed out

  • fireworks

  • this occurs cuz object tracing remains in the visual system after object has moved

7
New cards

Sensory memory capacity 1: Sperling 1960

How much information is stored in sensory memory?

  • Whole report condition: exposed to letters for 15-500ms, could barely recall (25%), mostly rows that they were attending to. 

  • partial report condition: exposed to letters while hearing a corresponding auditory tone, could recall most letters following the auditory cue.

    • decreased to zero after 1 sec delay

    • this suggests that participants could bring line of letters to STM even after it had disappeared. 

  • in other trials when sperling increased time btw when participants saw the letters and heard the tone, fewer letters were recalled. 

results: the shorted the delay btw stimulus and tone, the higher the letter recall

8
New cards

sensory memory: iconic and echoic memory

iconic

  • high capacity/short duration 

echoic

  • auditory form of sensory memory

9
New cards

Stage 2: STM

Function

  • stores attended information from sensory memory for 15-30 seconds

Purpose

  • holds info in place until it can be used for some behavioural task

  • holds only information that can be repeated/rehearsed for encoding

  • only encoded info is moved to long term memory for future retrieval 

e.g repeated a phone number someone js told you for a later time. 

auditory STM: 7 items

visual STM: 4 items

10
New cards

STM capacity

  • miller (1956) discovered the surprisingly stable capacity of auditory STM

  • different people have different stable reliable ability of that number of items

  • presented participants with lists of letters, or numbers, or words and asked them to repeat in order and noticed that people can recall an avg of 7 items

  • reliable across trials

11
New cards

Chunking

  • combination of letters that constituents to a meaningful whole

  • the capacity to chunk info into larger units depends on engaging LTM where patterns of previously encountered combinations are held. (see example in slides)

  • capacity: 7 chunks 

12
New cards

Chunking in Visual STM

13
New cards

Chunking Expertise

Power of chuncking

  • the ability to chunk can sometimes give the appearance of super memory and people dont rly do this cuz they have a better memory but rather a skilled ability to form large chunks. 

  • Chase and Simon (1973) examined the effect of expertise comparing chess experts and novices ability to memorize configurations of chess pieces. they found that when its correct placements the experts did better but for random placements they did about the same. 

  • experts greater ability is due to them being able to combine certain configurations into meaningful chunks. 

14
New cards

Duration of STM:

  • forever as long as u can rehearse. rehearsal is the repetition which reactivates the initial coding. 

  • Brown peterson task: the duration of STM without rehearsal is about 15 seconds. 

15
New cards

Causes of Forgetting in STM

  • Decay: forgetting just cause of the passage of time

  • Interference: New info that comes into memory serves the displace older info 

    • retroactive: info causes u to forget smthn in the past

    • proactive: info causes u to forget smthn u could learn in the future 

Peterson 1959

  • memorize 15,23,49 then count back from 76.96,64 to prevent rehersal so people forgot the OG info in 15-30 seconds and this was just thought to be decay.

Keppel and Underwood

  • early trials: people remembered more accurately, and in the later ones they started forgetting more quickly so interference also cuz previous memories competed with new ones. 

16
New cards

Lowandowsky and Badley

  • computer recall typing task where articulatory suppression was used to prevent rehearsal

  • Challenged Peterson and Peterson cuz participants remembered even as time passed on as long as theres no interference thus proving that decay isn’t a good cause of forgetting.

<ul><li><p>computer recall typing task where articulatory suppression was used to prevent rehearsal</p></li><li><p>Challenged Peterson and Peterson cuz participants remembered even as time passed on as long as theres no interference thus proving that decay isn’t a good cause of forgetting.</p></li></ul><p></p>
17
New cards

The working model of memory (Conrad and Brooks)

  • two types: auditory and visual 

Conrad (1964) found that when people had to memorize a list of letters, they had more difficulty when the letters sourness more similar to eachother vs when they didn't . ACOUSTIC CONFUSIONS. (ctvb is harder then carlm)

<ul><li><p>two types: auditory and visual&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p><p>Conrad (1964) found that when people had to memorize a list of letters, they had more difficulty when the letters sourness more similar to eachother vs when they didn't . ACOUSTIC CONFUSIONS. (ctvb is harder then carlm)</p><p></p>
18
New cards

The central executive in working memory

Vogel et al (2005)

  • Some researchers believe that deficits in memory that are associated with age are acc due to inability to filter out unwanted information from WM.

  • age related memory decline may be due to a decline in the central executive rather than the memory stores themselves.

<p>Vogel et al (2005)</p><ul><li><p>Some researchers believe that deficits in memory that are associated with age are acc due to inability to filter out unwanted information from WM. </p></li><li><p>age related memory decline may be due to a decline in the central executive rather than the memory stores themselves. </p></li></ul><p></p>
19
New cards

The episodic buffer

Challenging that visual and auditory memory are separate.

  • people can rmr more items when they form a coherent story: phonological loop must somehow interact with LTM. Concious experience appears to bind tgt different modalities.

  • The model in the picture suggests that theres a separate time limited model that combines info across all the diff stores including phonological loop, visual spatial sketchpad and the LTM.

  • Controlled by the central executive and is assumed to lead to conscious awareness of time based, multi sensory memories.

<p>Challenging that visual and auditory memory are separate.</p><ul><li><p>people can rmr more items when they form a coherent story: phonological loop must somehow interact with LTM. Concious experience appears to bind tgt different modalities.</p></li></ul><p></p><ul><li><p>The model in the picture suggests that theres a separate time limited model that combines info across all the diff stores including phonological loop, visual spatial sketchpad and the LTM. </p></li><li><p>Controlled by the central executive and is assumed to lead to conscious awareness of time based, multi sensory memories.</p></li></ul><p></p>
20
New cards

How is individual differences in working memory linked to measures of general intelligence?

  • correlated with measures of general intelligence. this relationship is likely due to visuo-spatial capacity, math performance, reasoning ability 

  • these associaions have led to increased empirical work.

    • work has shown that musical training can lead to improvements in WM in young children.

    • Studies like these have led to a boom in the brain training industry.

21
New cards

Brain training

  • often consists of repeated participation in increasingly difficult WM tasks.

  • aim: if people can increase their WM capacity, other areas of cognition may be enhanced as well. 

  • does it work?

    • controversial however data suggests WM improves with training but the connection to general intelligence is fuzzy. 

    • brain training app Luminosity was fined by FDA cuz they made overly broad claims about cognitive improvements due to their program. further research was needed. 

22
New cards

Where does WM happen in the brain?

  • no ONE region

  • modality specific regions

    • auditory: temporal

    • visual: occipital

  • frontal seems to play an important role 

23
New cards

Studies for neural basis of STM/WM

  • Funabashi et al (1998): the neutron went into overdrive during the delay period (active rmring). not for non memory.

  • Schon et al (2008): fMRI study increased activity in the prefrontal cortex during the delay phase. suggests role of frontal cortex.

  • Moore et al (2012): patients show impairments on tasks similar to the delayed matching tasks. 

<ul><li><p>Funabashi et al (1998): the neutron went into overdrive during the delay period (active rmring). not for non memory.</p></li><li><p>Schon et al (2008): fMRI study increased activity in the prefrontal cortex during the delay phase. suggests role of frontal cortex.</p></li><li><p>Moore et al (2012): patients show impairments on tasks similar to the delayed matching tasks.&nbsp;</p></li></ul><p></p><p></p>