SSD = PDD
SSD = Dose
↑SSD =↑PDD
↑SSD =↓Dose
As we increase the distance, we decrease the dose (intensity)
Dose (intensity) dependance on distance (SSD) is greater at (closer/further) distances
Closer
e.g. There is a BIG change in Dose Rate from 60 to 80 cm, but hardly any drop off from 160 to 180 cm/
1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
SSD = PDD
SSD = Dose
↑SSD =↑PDD
↑SSD =↓Dose
As we increase the distance, we decrease the dose (intensity)
Dose (intensity) dependance on distance (SSD) is greater at (closer/further) distances
Closer
e.g. There is a BIG change in Dose Rate from 60 to 80 cm, but hardly any drop off from 160 to 180 cm/
As we increase the distance, we decrease the dose (intensity). This decrease is more dramatic at distances closer to the surface.
This means that the PDD, decreases more rapidly (near /further away from ) the source than (near /further away from ) the source.
This means that the PDD, decreases more rapidly (near /further away from ) the source than (near /further away from ) the source.
i.e. Smaller SSD = Smaller PDD
Why does the PDD increase as Distance increases? (rationale for this effect)
↑SSD = ↑ molecules in the way = ↑ filtration = ↑ Eavg of the beam
↑ SSD = alters the geometry of the beam = makes the beam ↑ concentrated = ↑PDD
If there is a change in SSD, there will be a change in PDD.
We will need to figure out the new PDD.
List the most common method used to figure out a △PPD with a △SSD.
List another method
List the most accurate method
Mayneord F Factor
Bentel method
TAR Method
What is Mayneord F Factor used for?
Used to calculate a △PPD with a △Distance
(△Distance = △PDD)
Weakness of using Mayneord F Factor?
It uses strict application of I2 WITHOUT considering changes in scatter as distance changes
Strict application of I², DOES NOT consider △ scatter as distance △
Mayneord F Factor Formula
What does the Mayneord F Factor formula give you?
What does it not give you?
F Factor
PDD itself
The percent depth dose for a 15x15 field, 10cm depth, 80cm SSD is 58.4% for a Cobalt beam. Find the percent depth dose for the same field size and depth for an SSD of 100cm.
Dmax = 1.5 cm
Dmax = 3.5 cm
↑ SSD = ↑ PDD
Why was this property used for Cobalt?
Why not set SSD at 200 or more?
During that time, linacs weren’t available, and every little we could do to help obtain a deeper penetrating beam was sought.
↑ SSD = ↓ Intensity(dose) = ↑ treatment time to get to desired dose