Attention and Control Essay

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/27

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

28 Terms

1
New cards

What is choking (and reference)?

The occurrence of inferior performance despite striving and incentives for superior performance" (Baumeister 1986)

2
New cards

What is an example of choking in a high pressure sporting situation (and reference)?

Having a lower free throw accuracy later on in a game when the score is close (Toma 2017)

3
New cards

What is hot-hand perception (and reference)?

The belief that someone who has been successful is more likely to succeed again (Gilovich 1985)

4
New cards

How does hot-hand perception link to choking, and what evidence is there for this?

  • Raises expectations and importance on the ‘hot athlete‘, increasing pressure on them

  • Scoring a 3rd consecutive shot in basketball is only 46% probable

5
New cards

Explain the Theory of Challenge and Threat States in Athletes (TCTSA)?

Jones 2009

  • Goal relevant evaluative situation = the stressful situation the athlete is in

  • Demands = the demands required of the athlete in the situation

  • Resources = the resources the athlete believes they have avalable (such as physical skill, self-efficacy, perceived control)

  • Coping potential = The athletes overall idea if they can cope with the situation or not, YES or NO

  • Challenge state = occurs when coping potential is YES, causes facilitative psycho and somatic changes

  • Threat state = occurs when coping potential is NO, causing debilitative psycho and somatic changes

<p>Jones 2009</p><ul><li><p>Goal relevant evaluative situation = the stressful situation the athlete is in</p></li><li><p>Demands = the demands required of the athlete in the situation</p></li><li><p>Resources = the resources the athlete believes they have avalable (such as physical skill, self-efficacy, perceived control)</p></li><li><p>Coping potential = The athletes overall idea if they can cope with the situation or not, YES or NO</p></li><li><p>Challenge state = occurs when coping potential is YES, causes facilitative psycho and somatic changes</p></li><li><p>Threat state = occurs when coping potential is NO, causing debilitative psycho and somatic changes</p></li></ul><p></p>
6
New cards

What are the types of demands of a situation?

  • Task difficulty

  • Individual responsibility

  • Expectations

  • Self-paced skill

  • Match situation

  • Distractors (internal and external)

7
New cards

What is the Contingency-Competence-Control (CCC) model?

Jordet 2006

  • CCC model focuses on the perceived control of an athlete in a situation

  • It states that an athletes perception of control influences their resource appraisal

  • THREAT STATE = athlete fixates on uncontrollable factors

  • CHALLENGE STATE = athlete fixates on controllable factors

8
New cards

What 2 factors determine perceived control in the CCC model?

  1. Perceived outcome contingency = how much the athlete believes the outcome is determined by skill or luck

  2. Perceived competence = how skilled and capable the athlete believes they are

9
New cards

What is Jordet’s 2006 research for CCC on Penalty shootouts

  • Interviewed 10 penalty takers from a euros

  • When player’s perceived contingency and competence, their cognitive and somatic anxiety reduced

10
New cards

What is stress inoculation training (and reference)?

Meichenbaum 1985

  • Strategy to emphasise the development of coping strategies and self-control

11
New cards

What are the stages of stress inoculation training?

  1. Educated on how self-talk influences emotions and behaviour

  2. Trained to self-monitor and recognise anxiety increasing thoughts

  3. Practice positive self-talk, imagery, mental rehearsal. focus on the cognitive strategies

  4. Practice relaxation, behavioural rehearsal. focus on the somatic strategies

  5. Introduced to graded exposure of stressful situations, where they implement their new techniques

12
New cards

What evidence supports the effectiveness of stress inoculation theory?

Study on exposing athletes to high-pressure situation found that there was a large positive effect on performance under pressure (g = 0.85)

13
New cards

What are pre-performance routines (and reference)?

(Moran 1996)

  •  "a sequence of task-relevant thoughts and actions which an athlete engages in systematically prior to the athletes performance of a specific sports skill"

14
New cards

How are pre-performance routines useful for a elite athlete during a simple skill?

  • Simple skills are autonomous meaning low cognitive demands. This increases the potential of internal and external distractors

  • Therefore a pre-performance routine can help distract away from anxiety and stressors

15
New cards

What is Singer’s 5 step strategy to create a pre-performance routine?

  1. Ready = think positively of the performances expectations

  2. Image = mentally picture performing the skill and feeling the movement

  3. Focus = focus on a meaningful cue and concentrate on one relevant cue (e.g. a target to hit during a conversion)

  4. Execute = perform the skill whilst not thinking about anything but the movement

  5. Evaluate = use feedback to assess the performance and effectiveness, and make adjustments if necessary

16
New cards

What evidence did Cotterill 2010 find on Singers 5 step pre-performance routines?

Emphasis on FOCUS + EXECUTE replicate identical results as the full 5 step strategy

17
New cards

What is quiet eye?

“The final fixation on the target before the initiation of the movement“

For example, the ball in golf

18
New cards

What evidence did Vine 2011 find about quiet eye?

When going from a pre-test to a pressure test for basketball free throws:

  • Quiet eye group rose from 50 to 60% accurate

  • Control group went from 50 to 36% accurate

Therefore we can train athletes quiet eye to focus for longer during a task

19
New cards

Why are higher status players more likely to choke?

  • High status players have an inflated self-esteem and heightened expectations on them

  • This causes a greater ego threat on them if they fail, causing more anxiety

  • This increases the risk of self-regulation to breakdown, leading to choking

<ul><li><p>High status players have an inflated self-esteem and heightened expectations on them</p></li><li><p>This causes a greater ego threat on them if they fail, causing more anxiety</p></li><li><p>This increases the risk of self-regulation to breakdown, leading to choking</p></li></ul><p></p>
20
New cards

What did Jordet’s 2009 study on high status players show?

  • 41 players who took 67 penalties

  • Current high status = 65% accurate

  • Future high status = 89% accurate

This shows the skill was there, but the high status wasn’t affecting them at the time

21
New cards

What did Jordet 2006 study on avoidance behaviour in penalty shootouts show?

Involved 359 kicks (25+ and 34-)

  • Kickers engaged in 3x more avoidance looking for negative valence shots than positive valence shots

  • Positive valence kicks had a 30% higher success rate

  • Positive valence shots took double the time of other shots

22
New cards

What are different valenced shots in a penalty shootout (Jordet 2006)?

Positive valence = a kick to win the game

Negative valence = a kick to not lose the game

Neutral valence = any other kick

23
New cards

What are the 2 components of attentional control theory?

  • Top-down = conscious and deliberate attention guided by the athletes goals and strategies

  • Bottom-down = automatic and reactive attention which is based on threatening stimuli

24
New cards

What did Wilson et al 2009 study show about attentional control theory?

Study on anxiety increasing during a penalty which would be analysed:

  • 26% more fixations on the keeper

  • Increase of 56% fixation time on the keeper

  • Kicks being 14cm closer to the keeper

25
New cards

How can TCTSA be used for an intervention?

  • Focus on the athletes appraisal of demands and resources, which will positively favour the performers resources

  • Therefore use language (positive self-talk and teammates support) and behaviour that emphasises self-efficacy, perceived control, and approach behaviour (e.g. "back yourself, be confident")

26
New cards

What did Turners’ 2014 study on TCTSA show?

  • 46 novice climbers watched a video, half with a challenge statement and half with threat statement

  • Challenge video saw higher self efficacy and control, and lower cardiac output and muscle tension

  • Threat video saw lower cardiac output and higher muscle tension

Therefore changing the demands and resources can directly affect their state towards a task

27
New cards

What did Jordet 2012 study on penalties show?

8 players interviewed about a euros penalty shootout

  • 35 stressors were identified around the end of extra time

  • 17/35 were easily manageable (e.g. told the order of penalty takers)

28
New cards

What are challenge approaches to a penalty shootout?

P = plan the kick order and accept players may miss, acknowledging its a group task

R = relish the task, not fearing failure

E = educating players, e.g. which way a keeper dives

P = practice individual strategy, practice different techniques of penalties

A = anxcited, remind the player the anxiety is a positive effect

R = rehearse, practice the penalties especially under pressure situations

E = embrace sport science expertise