1/75
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
police interrogations in north america
confession has to be backed up by some other form of evidence
police interrogation
police interview a suspect
gathering evidence and obtaining a confession
physical coercion
used to extract confession (old)
less frequient
replaced with psychologically based interrogation techniwues
mr. big
outside interrogation room
undercover officers posing as members of a criminal organization
lure suspect into gang
interviewed by ‘Mr. Big’ but dirt is needed
once confession is given, it is used against the suspect in trial
reid model
used to extract a confession
three-part proess of reid model
gather evidence related to crime and interview witnesses and victims
conduct nonaccusatorial interview of suspect to assess deception
conduct accusatorial interrogation of the suspect if they are perceived to be guilty
9 step procedure follows
nine-step procedure in reid model: steps 1-3
suspect confronted with guilt
allow suspect to rationalize or excuse crime
interrogator interrupts statements of denial
nine-step procedure in reid model: steps 4-6
interrogator overcomes supects’ objections to charges
ensure they have the suspects attention
interrogator exhibits smypathy and understanding
nine-step procedure in reid model: steps 7-9
suspect is offered explanations for the crime
self-incrimination is easier to achieve
suspect accepts responsibility for crime
interrogator gets written confession
minimization techniques
soft sell tactics
used by police interrogators
provide suspect with moral justification for the crime
maximization techniques
scare tactics
convey interrogators belief that the suspect is guilty
denails will fail
confident → hopeless
use of reid in actual interrogations
not really used in practice
cops dont use core components of reid
few coercive strategies in interrogation
problems with reid
ability to detect deception
investigator bias
coercive/siggestive nature of interrogation practices → false confessions
deception detection
detecting when someone is being deceptive
little reearch to show that police are more skilled at this
laws in canada
rights of suspects are in the charter of rights and freedoms
rights to silence and legal counsel
investigator bias
bias when police officers begin interrogation believing suspect is guilty
leads to coercive interrogations
interrogaters with guilty expectations would (6):
asked more questions
higher frequency of interrogation techniques
judged more suspects
more pressure on suspec
interrogation practices and the courts
judge muat consider whether the confession was made voluntarily
whether defendent was competent
r. v. oickle
confessed to 7 counts of arson
promised psychiatric help if he confessed
minimized severity
promised to spare his girlfrined
4- point framework for a confession to be voluntary
must consider whether police made threats or promises
look for an atmosphere of oppression
if suspect was competent
degree of police trickery used
alternative to reid model
peace model
peace acronym
planning and preperation
engage
account
closure
evaluation
what is the peace model
framework for conducting police interrogations
conversation management
conversation management
encourages info gathering over
false confessions
elicited in response to a demand for a confession
intentionally fabricated or not based on actual knowledge of facts
retracted confessions
suspect declaring the confession they made is false
disputed confessions
confessions disputed at trial
does not mean it is false
legal technicialities
disputes confession was ever made
frequency of false confessions
difficult to determine if confession is actually false
types of false confessions
coerced internalized
coerced compliant
voluntary false confession
voluntary false confession
someone voluntariy confesses to a crime they did not commit
no elicitation from police
reasons for voluntary false confessions (4)
desire for notoriety
person unable to distinguish fact from fiction
need to make up for feelings of guilt
desire to protect somebody from harm
ex. jon benet
coerced compliant false confessions
suspect confesses to a crime
they know they did not commit it
coercive interrogation tactics
reasons for coerced compliant confessions
escape further interrogation
gain promised benefit
avoid threatened punishment
ex. r. v. m.j.s.
coerced internalized false confessions
individuals confess to a crime they did not commit
exposed to highly suggestible questioning
end up believing they committed the crime
reasons for coerced-internalized false confessions
substance abuse
impariment in brain function
inability to seperate fact from fiction
poor mental state
false confessions in the lab
computer crash experiment
key that would crash computer even without eliciation from participant
compliance
going along with demands made
computer crash study - results
many accepted responsibility even though they were innocent
internalization
participant accepted blame for crime
even thouhg they did not commit crime
confabulation
reporting events that never haooened
consequences of false confessions
convict innocent person of crime
consequences for police
why people believe false confession
jurors dont believe someone would falsely confess
people cannot distinguish between true and false confessions
false confessions are similar to true confessions
criminal profiling
technique
identifying major personality and behavioral characteristics of an individual
analysis of crimes they have commited
purpose of criminal profiling (4)
set traps to flush out offenders
threatening note should be taken seriously
give advice on how to interrogate suspect
hhow to break down defendants in cross-examinations
jack the ripper
first criminal profile
police surgean engaged ina form of criminal profiling
vicllas
developed by rcmp
help collect and analyze info on serious crimes in canada
linkage blindness
inability of police to link crimes to each other
important details differ based on officers
investigative psychology
david canter
profiling → scientific practice
how is a criminal profile constructed
little known about profiling process
different methods
deductive criminal profiling
prediction of an offender’s background
from analysis of evidence left at crime schene
logic
inductive criminal profiling
prediction of an offenders background from comparison of that offnders crime with similar crimes committed
offenders share similar traits
organized-disorganizd model
used by fbi
crime scenes and backgrounds of serial offenders are either organied-disorganized
organized model
well-planned
controlled
disorganized model
impulsive
chaotic
investigative psych approaches to profiling
rely on previosuly solved cases
more emphasis on testing validity of categories
degree of linkage between crime scenes
four clusters for search strategies
hunters
poachers
trollers
trappers
hunters
seek victims close to their home
poachers
travel long distance to find victims
trollers
encounter victims during regular routine
trappers
put themseles in situations where they have access to preferred victims
three clusters for victim selction
specific physical features
child and adolescent victims with specific features
no preferred type of victim
three clusters of approach behaviors
opportunistic cons
home intruder
non-violent persuasion
opportunistic cons
use a ruse to approach victims
home intruder
forces their way into the home
non-violent persuasion
try and get close to familiar victims
three clusters for actual assault
violence and control
attempt
persuasion and sexual
violence and control
verbal and physical force
attempt
offenders use little physical force
verbally threaten and cease the attack if the victim resisted
persuasion and sexual
persuasive tsctics but no force
attention on sexual acts
three clusters for background characteristics
socially competent
antisocial generalist
sexually deviant
validity of criminal profiling - negatives
based on theory
lack support
vague
no better than untrained individuals
classic trait model
determinants of behavior are stable-internal
key assumptions in criminal profiling
offendera have stable fashion across crimes they commut
relations exist between way offenders commit crimes
geographic profiling
uses crime scene locations
predict most likely area where offender resides
yorkshire ripper → first time it was used
geographic profiling systems
use math models of offender spatial behavior
make predictions about unknown serial offenders
find out where they reside