1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Appointment of Chief Justice Earl Warren
more activist supreme court
positive activism → turning over previous precedents which were against civil rights
political impact of a sympathetic supreme court is long term and significant
Most rulings fall under a liberal stance
can overturn all the precedents which blocked activism until 1954
ensuring rulings stay in line with a more progressive political ideology
giving activists more encouragement to attempt landmark cases
Brown vs. Topeka
1954
Test case to overturn Plessy vs Ferguson 1896
if the separate but equal doctrine could be overturned, then so could all other segregation laws as they were all created under that mantra
once the ruling was made, then they could tackle longer term issues such as unequal housing and schooling funding
unanimous ruling → the separate but equal doctrine had no place
accepted the psychological evidence that being educated separately encouraged feelings of inferiority amongst schoolchildren
usually accepted as tenuous evidence → reflecting how important it was that the supreme court was sympathetic
Lending credence, momentum and legitimacy to the civil rights movement
Thurgood Marshall - respected and capable lawyer for the NAACP since 1935
Played on the cold war influence to sway judges
Overturning the legal base for the Jim Crow era was hoped to overturn the era itself
Impact of Brown vs. Topeka
Test case combined with 5 other cases to give it the momentum it require to get to the supreme court
1955: Brown II ruling that desegregation should happen with ‘all possible speed’
1957 - 723 school districts had integrated
Limitations to Brown vs. Topeka
1957: only 12% of the South’s 6300 districts had desegregated
7 southern states had not admitted any black pupils into all white schools
1956 - membership of the White Citizen’s Council increased rapidly
250,000 members
membership of the KKK increased - reactionary
terrorised and mobbed black children looking to integrate schools
1956 - the Southern Manifesto was drafted, accusing the Supreme Court of abusing its power and claiming it would use all lawful means to avoid integration
1959 - Virginia closed all its state schools instead of integrating
only offered fee-paying private education
isolating black children who were victims of the poverty gap
ensuring private education remained all white too
Schools across the south started closing following this example
Teachings from Brown vs. Topeka
Supreme Court decisions were not significant and could not bring about major change without action from Congress ensuring states followed the ruling
Continuity issue - lack of enforcement
Represented in the Little Rock 9 1957, which convinced activists that only direct action would ensure loopholes were closed
took until 1960 to integrate Arkansas High
Second legislation was needed as the first ruling wasn’t respected → power of the south
no date for issue to be changed by
didn’t tackle de facto segregation - supreme court rulings still needed grassroots activism
Montgomery Bus Boycott
1955-56
Sparked the mass non-violent movement
Economic tactics used in a year long boycott
Black passengers made up 75% of the Montgomery buses’ revenues
severe financial loss lead to the desegregation of the bus system in Montgomery
Rosa Parks used
Middle aged, respectable, middle class
ensuring white revulsion at her treatment - playing by their own values
encouraged support and ensured the moral high ground
Local churches played a close role organising meeting houses and free taxi services
Impact of the Montgomery Bus Boycott
MIA set up, introducing Martin Luther King into the non-violent movement
adding Christian values of love and forgiveness to the movement, helping King rise to prominence
evoked violent white reaction
King’s house firebombed
Rosa Parks arrested several times
introduction of the television - nationwide coverage
embarrassing for government and also raising awareness
King: excellent leader, talented orator, attracted lots of support to the movement
not on police records - would be less conspicuous
Bowder vs. Gayle
1956
Second significant NAACP case
Supreme Court ruled that transport segregation was unconstitutional
cited Brown vs. Topeka
Positive outcomes of the Montgomery Bus Boycott
cohesive community action
power potential of the non-violent movement recognised
SCLC founded in 1957 as a result
Providing an alternative to the NAACP’s litigation tactics
fighting on a new front
most push = more momentum
Directly challenged Jim Crow laws in the South → had not been dared attempted before
the business lost $1 million
inspired 20 other boycotts across America
Limitations to the Montgomery Bus Boycott
Majority of Jim Crowe structures still in place
the presidential election of 1956 ignored the issue of civil rights
only that particular bus company affected - not widespread
Positives of President Eisenhower
1959 - ruling that closing state schools to avoid integration was unconstitutional
first time a president had sent troops to the south for civil rights since the reconstruction
favoured balance and acted when violence occurred - became a tactic of the non-violent movement to encourage violence
Federal Judgement overruling state protest
used his position as commander in chief of the armed forces
sent 1100 troops to the Little Rock 9
Federalised the National Guard so he could enter states
Failures of President Eisenhower
little personal interest - didn’t want to cause resentment
hesitancy taken advantage of in the south
didn’t send troops after Faubus threatened that ‘Blood would run on the streets’ during the Little Rock 9
only intervened when facing bad publicity and the threat of looking weak
cared more about international viewership and being personally affronted
acted when not being proactive would be more politically damaging
SNCC
1960
Student non-violent coordinating committee
Stokely Carmichael headed it in 1966
took it in a more militant direction
Greensboro Sit In
1960
Aim
overturn segregation/achieve service in the Woolworths food counter
Method
4 students enter the counter
refuse to leave until they are served
Groups involved
SNCC
Method drew the attention of NAACP and CORE
Impact
Desegregated counters in Woolworths and other similar establishments by mid-1960s
Campaign spread rapidly
55 cities, 13 states held sit ins
over 70,000 sit ins with 3000 arrests
showcased the economic power of the black community learnt in the Montgomery bus boycott
Whites stopped coming to businesses which had sit ins
services desegregated because of worries about negative brand publicity
Freedom Rides
1961
Aims
Force desegregation in bus terminals and all public spaces within them
challenge the supreme court judgement desegregating bus terminals
encourage JFK to enforce legislation
Method
Interracial volunteers ride the interstate buses in the Deep South
deliberately using segregated facilities to evoke a reaction
Groups
Organised by CORE
joined by the NAACP and SCLC in some states
Impact
Robert Kennedy set up the Interstate Commerce Commission in 1961
ensuring enforcement of the supreme court ruling
provoked the desired reaction from white racists → publicity and propaganda
Bull Connor colluded with the KKK to allow riders to be attacked
spectacle of bombing and beating up riders was widely televised
beginning the mass movement that included not just black activists but other minorities and white activists
Albany
1962
Aims
Desegregation of the entire community of Albany
test the ICC ban on interstate travel segregation
Method
started by 9 students
Sit ins/jail ins/Boycotts/litigation
Groups involved
SCLC temporarily, giving the movement national recognition with King
NAACP
SNCC
Impact
did not get the white violent reaction necessary
activists promised a discussion of their terms from jail but never received this
Laurie Pritchett avoiding confrontation in front of the cameras and paying for King’s bail
segregation remained in place
SNCC and King clashed over tactics - SNCC thought he was taking over their grassroots campaigning
Learning
Required to attack one specific element of civil rights to make a difference
this would set a precedent that could then be applied to the next issue
tactic of momentum
The movement from 1955-62
Tactics starting to develop - non-violent direct action
boycotts and sit-ins preferred methods
civil rights groups still in their infancies, causing infighting
momentum only just starting
mainly student led
minimal presidential involvement
they did learn that presidential involvement was the key to success in the future
more at a grassroots level with protests individual and not linked to others across the country
limited white sympathy but churches starting to become important
aims too broad
Birmingham Riots
1963
Aims
Desegregation in Birmingham
an end to employment discrimination
Methods
Boycotts of prejudiced shops
boycotting segregated facilities
sit ins
March on Birmingham → involving school children
Groups
SCLC
Impact
Bull Connor gave them the required violence
turned firehoses and dogs on the crowd, including children
broadcasted around the world - high publicity
embarrassed the Kennedy administration into proposing a civil rights act → JFK giving the June civil rights address
King arrested and wrote the famous letters from Birmingham Jail
Civil rights movement gained more support from outside the Deep South
economic impact weakened segregation enough so King could negotiate the desegregation of stores
March on Washinton
1963
Aims
Desegregation
Methods
Public march
Speeches from high ranking figures → ‘I have a dream’
Groups
SCLC, NAACP, CORE
Impact
250,000 attended from all walks of life
Lincoln Memorial chosen as an end point as reminiscence of the Reconstruction
positive, powerful image internationally
white and federal support - JFK briefed
all groups working coherently
however, the speech did not alter attitudes in congress and the civil rights act was still blocked
church bomb 4 days after, killing 4 young girls - it was not over yet
Kennedy’s assassination that November
Selma
1965
Aims
Voting rights
end of voter registration test
eg. in Dallas, 57% population were black but only 335 African Americans registered to vote
Methods
Sheriff Clark used to entice white violence
March 1 from Montgomery to Selma - 3000 arrested
March 2 from Selma to Montgomery faced severe violence from troops on the Edmund Pettus Bridge
after the last successful 4 day march, 25,000 attended a speech given by King
Impact
Violence widely broadcasted and outraged millions
showed the strength and perseverance of the non-violent movement and the opposing injustice of the white opposition
changed the minds of many
Johnson used the event to demand voting rights legislation from a cautious congress
directly led to the Voting Rights Act
pushed group cooperation to its limit - SCLC and SNCC barely talking
The movement from 1963 to 1965
greater white support and publicity
still non-violent
greater participation due to the rise of famous individuals
Martin Luther King - the secure figurehead
further dissent between groups
Police brutality led to Johnson and Kennedy playing far larger roles
Liberal supreme court ensured these movements had positive consequences
Changing attitudes due to
Cold War and localised pressure
groups beginning to network
the role of King as a figurehead and orator
the precedents set by the activist supreme court
the growth of television
the tactic of encouraging violence
federal troops being sent to help giving credence
white supremacist representatives giving the movement what they needed for support
Positives of President Kennedy
worked with Robert several times to release King from Jail
Changed his attitudes when witnessing James Meredith/Freedom rides → started getting personally involved
June address testimony to a genuine conviction
put political capital in for Johnson to use on later legislation
successfully tackled most of the protests
Negatives of President Kennedy
worried about southern Democrat vote
more rhetoric than practical achievement
majority of his proposed legislation was blocked by Southern Congressmen
his brother as attorney general saw the issue as more worth pursuing
opposed sending troops to the Little Rock 9
irritated at the distraction from his foreign policy, which was his priority
Positives of President Johnson
proof of commitment before his vice-Presidency
High political skill got southern congressmen to support his legislation that Kennedy didn’t manage
willing to compromise white Southerner vote ‘I have just handed the South over to Republicanism’
1964 Civil Rights Act
1965 Voting Rights Act
1968 Housing Rights Act
Civil Rights Act
1964
federal control over state voting laws
segregation in all facilities illegal
federal assistance for the desegregation of public schools
employment discrimination illegal
Equal Employment Opportunities Commission set up - learning from enforcement issue
Voting Rights Act
1965
banning literacy test
250,000 new African American voters had been registered in 1965
1980 - African American voters only numbered 7% lower than white
1965 - 72 elected African American officials in the south
1976 - 1944 elected officials
Powerful blow against state individuality
federal government could now enforce civil rights in the South
However…
explosion of rioting during the 1960s
social problems went unaddressed
democratic party never recovered the 4 southern states it lost to republicanism
Urban rioting
Watts
Just 5 days after the Voting Rights Act passed
ended after deploying 13900 national guardsmen
34 killed and 1000 injured
the acute social and economic grievances felt unsolved by the Civil Rights act a year before
heavy police brutality
38 more riots in 1966
7 killed and 400 injured
$5 million dollars in damage
1967, 164 more riots
Kerner Commission
1968
set up by Johnson to investigate the causes of disorder
blamed rioting on:
Discrimination in education
employment gap
housing segregation
Recommended federal investment to improve ghettoization
unlikely to be supported as he had already spent a lot of federal budget on creating a welfare state
Vietnam war diverting resources and attention - Johnson’s and the world's
many saw the rioting as a law and order, not federal, issue
Reflecting the poor implementation and enforcement of legislation in the North
Nation of Islam and Malcolm X
Joined by Malcolm X in 1952
oratory and writing gift conveying radical views appealing to students and young militaristic men
attracted 40,000 members by 1960
promoted the self esteem and pride of young African Americans
improved conditions in the ghettos with food and education
criticised for condoning violence and commenting negatively on JFK’s assassination
adopted a socialist stance after breaking from the Nation of Islam
Anti integrationist, militant
attracted less support from middle class
Stokely Carmichael
coined the term ‘Black Power’ on the Meredith March 1966
Turning point in relations between King, SNCC, SCLC → didn’t want them coming to the march
Separatist - did not want cooperation with white liberals
urban riots in the north seen as a projection of the Black Power movement and rejection of King
King limitations
media coverage more critical in making him famous
failures in Albany focused on long term
blamed for provoking white violence
1966 - 63% of the population disagreed with civil rights protests
1967 - 82% disagreed
assassination triggered rioting in 130 cities
undermining his whole ethos
King-centric school of thought
given the Nobel peace prize and birthday made a national holiday → significant
‘I have a dream speech’ - one of the most influential in the whole movement
heavily influenced the civil and voting rights acts and they were two of the most significant
Non King-Centric school of thought
Slow burning NAACP approach since 1909 chipped away at the foundations so others could build on it
local workers and local protests more important
impossible without an activist supreme court
presidential figures, liberal opinion, cold war context = all big roles
rift with CORE and SNCC undermined the movement
criticised for stealing the efforts of underappreciated activists
would walk to the front of protests at the very end
join only halfway through
bringing his ideology to more militant protests and erasing them
radicalised after the onset of the Vietnam War 1965 with socialist ideas - lost him much white support
split with the white house over the issue
could have continued campaigning with them to tackle de facto segregation