Court Cases for Exam 1 BLAW

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/20

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 6:56 PM on 8/31/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

21 Terms

1
New cards

Roper v. Simmons

Execution of offenders who were under 18 when they committed the crime violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

2
New cards

Marbury v. Madison

Established judicial review—the Supreme Court's authority to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional.

3
New cards

Hertz Corp. v. Friend

A corporation's principal place of business for diversity jurisdiction is its "nerve center"—the single place where officers direct control and coordinate the corporation's activities typically its headquarters.

4
New cards

Doe v. Smith

A complaint must contain sufficient factual allegations to state a plausible legal claim and survive a motion to dismiss.

5
New cards

Reier Broadcasting Co. v. Kramer

An injunction requires irreparable harm and a showing that monetary damages would be inadequate.

6
New cards

Texas v. Johnson

Burning the American flag as political expression is protected symbolic speech under the First Amendment.

7
New cards

Katzenbach v. McClung

Congress may regulate even a local business under the Commerce Clause when its activities affect interstate commerce such as purchasing substantial supplies that moved across state lines.

8
New cards

NFIB v. Sebelius

The ACA individual mandate was upheld under Congress's Taxing Clause power but could not be justified under the Commerce Clause; threatening states with loss of existing Medicaid funding to compel expansion was unconstitutionally coercive.

9
New cards

Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe

Student-led prayer over a public high school's PA system at football games violates the First Amendment Establishment Clause.

10
New cards

Virginia v. Black

A state may prohibit cross burning intended to intimidate but cross burning by itself cannot automatically establish intent to intimidate.

11
New cards

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

Public officials suing for defamation must prove "actual malice"—knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth.

12
New cards

Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition

The Supreme Court struck down overbroad restrictions on virtual or simulated depictions that appeared to involve minors when no actual minors were involved because the restrictions violated the First Amendment.

13
New cards

Snyder v. Phelps

Peaceful speech concerning public issues in a public forum such as picketing near a military funeral is protected by the First Amendment against state tort liability.

14
New cards

United States v. Alvarez

False statements such as lying about receiving military honors are not automatically excluded from First Amendment protection; the Stolen Valor Act's prohibition was unconstitutional.

15
New cards

Morse v. Frederick

Public schools may restrict student speech at school-sponsored events when the speech is reasonably interpreted as promoting illegal drug use.

16
New cards

Citizens United v. FEC

Independent political expenditures are protected by the First Amendment; corporations and unions may spend unlimited amounts on independent political advocacy.

17
New cards

Katz v. United States

A Fourth Amendment search occurs when government intrudes upon a person's reasonable expectation of privacy; warrantless wiretapping of a private phone conversation violated the Fourth Amendment.

18
New cards

Maryland v. King

A routine DNA cheek swab from a person arrested for a serious crime is a reasonable search under the Fourth Amendment.

19
New cards

Mapp v. Ohio

The exclusionary rule applies to the states—evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is generally inadmissible in state court.

20
New cards

Minnesota v. Dickerson

Under the Plain Feel Doctrine police conducting a lawful Terry frisk may seize contraband when its illegal nature is immediately apparent through touch.

21
New cards

Terry v. Ohio

Police may briefly stop a person based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and frisk for weapons when they reasonably suspect the person is armed and dangerous.