Prosocial and antisocial behaviour

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/40

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

41 Terms

1
New cards

What is the definition of prosocial behaviour?

A behaviour that benefits someone else at a cost to the self

2
New cards

Through which mechanisms could prosociality evolve?

Reciprocity and indirect reciprocity

3
New cards

Which researchers investigated whether 18mo infants are helpful by presenting them with situations where an experimenter needed help?

Warneken & Tomasello (2006)

4
New cards

What are the 3 main prosocial emotions?

Empathy, Sympathy, and Guilt

5
New cards

What is the definition of empathy?

Feeling as others feel

6
New cards

Simner (1971) is cited for investigating empathy in infants. What did this study involve?

Investigating if infants cry when they hear another infant crying

7
New cards

What is the definition of sympathy?

A feeling of concern for others

8
New cards

Zahn-Waxler et al. (1992) investigated infants' responses to their mothers' distress to study the origins of sympathy. What behaviours were coded as prosocial?

Physical comfort, Verbal comfort, Verbal advice, Helping, and Sharing

9
New cards

According to Zahn-Waxler et al.'s (1992) findings, how did infants' prosocial responding change over the second year of life?

Infants showed concern for others, and prosocial responding increased and became more diverse with age

10
New cards

Vaish et al. (2009) investigated whether young children can sympathise even in the absence of overt emotional cues. What did they find about 18-month-old infants' likelihood to help an experimenter who lost her balloon?

Infants were more likely to help if they had previously observed someone be mean to her

11
New cards

What is guilt?

An aversive emotion that follows the realization that one has harmed another person

12
New cards

While often viewed as toxic, guilt is said to play a vital role in regulating social interactions. How does it do this in adults?

Guilt motivates reparative and prosocial behaviors

13
New cards

Vaish et al. (2016) tested the development of guilt as a motivator. What did they find regarding 3-year-old children's tendency to repair damage after causing a mishap?

Three-year-old children were more likely to try to repair the damage when the mishap was their fault

14
New cards

Vaish et al. (2016) found that guilt appears to emerge as a distinct motivator of prosocial behaviour by what age?

By at least 3 years

15
New cards

Tangney & Dearing (2002) studied the consequences of guilt. What did they find about fifth-grade children who were prone to guilt?

They were less likely to be arrested, convicted, and incarcerated in adolescence, more likely to practice safe sex, and less likely to abuse drugs

16
New cards

How might parents influence children's prosocial behaviour, according to Hammond (2011)?

Through modelling of empathic and responsive behaviour and through direct instruction

17
New cards

According to Rheingold (1982), how else do parents socialize prosociality?

By scaffolding their children's participation in everyday household tasks and chores

18
New cards

Zahn-Waxler et al. (1992) identified a robust contributor to empathic concern and prosocial behaviour in 1- and 2-year-olds. What was it?

Parents’ warm and sensitive responding to a child's needs

19
New cards

Brownell et al. (2013) investigated parental mental state talk. What type of helping did parents' mental state talk predict?

Emotion-based helping, which requires understanding the recipient's internal state

20
New cards

What is the definition of aggression?

Behaviour that intentionally harms other people by inflicting pain or injury

21
New cards

How is relational aggression defined?

Behaviour that intentionally upsets another person, including criticising, ridiculing, telling tales, social excluding, or calling names

22
New cards

Crick et al. (1997) examined aggression in 3- and 4-year-olds. What was the relationship found between children high in overt and relational aggression and prosocial behaviour?

Children high in overt and relational aggression were low in prosocial behaviour

23
New cards

Crick et al. (1997) also found a link between aggression levels and peer acceptance. What was this link?

Children who were particularly aggressive tended to be rejected by their peers

24
New cards

According to Coie and Dodge (1998), negative social experiences may lead children to develop a hostile attribution bias. What does this mean?

Children expect other people to be hostile and this primes them to act aggressively

25
New cards

Federman (1998) found evidence regarding violence content on children's TV programmes in the US. What percentage was reported to contain violence?

66%

26
New cards

Moffitt et al. (1996) studied extreme anti-social behaviour in boys from Dunedin. What difficult temperament trait did they find was present at age 3 in the consistently anti-social sub-sample?

Being irritable

27
New cards

Hinshaw et al. (1993) associated extreme anti-social behaviour in childhood and adolescence with which disorder?

Attention deficit disorder

28
New cards

What are the key characteristics of callous-unemotional traits?

Limited empathy, a lack of guilt, and shallow affect

29
New cards

According to Viding et al.'s (2005) twin study, antisocial behaviour with high levels of callous-unemotional traits was found to be strongly influenced by what factor?

It was strongly heritable

30
New cards

callous-unemotional traits may be malleable. How do children with these traits respond to warm parenting?

They respond positively to warm parenting

31
New cards

Dadds et al. (2012) suggest that children with high levels of callous-unemotional traits might benefit from training in what areas?

Emotional literacy and emotional recognition

32
New cards

How can morality be thought of in terms of judgment, behaviour, and emotion?

Moral judgment is distinguishing right from wrong, Moral behaviour is acting on that distinction, and Moral emotions are feeling pride in virtuous conduct or guilt/shame over violations

33
New cards

Which developmental psychologist is closely linked to the study of moral judgment and used moral dilemmas like the stories of John and Henry?

Piaget

34
New cards

Piaget found a difference in how younger and older children judge moral dilemmas involving negative outcomes. What was this difference?

Younger children tend to judge the negative outcome more harshly, while older children tend to judge the negative intention more harshly

35
New cards

According to Piaget, what governs younger children's morality, and what develops with age and peer interaction?

Younger morality is governed by respect for adults’ rules; with age and peer interaction, a morality of cooperation develops

36
New cards

What did Kohlberg use to study children's moral judgment, similar to Piaget?

Moral dilemmas, like the famous example about Heinz

37
New cards

While higher cognitive development is associated with higher moral reasoning, what is a critique of Kohlberg's stages regarding action?

Higher cognitive development does not automatically lead to more moral actions

38
New cards

What is one significant critique of Kohlberg's stages based on the samples used?

The samples were not representative (e.g., primarily male, Western)

39
New cards

How might Kohlberg's tasks underestimate the abilities of young children?

They focus on verbally demanding legalistic dilemmas

40
New cards

Hamlin et al. (2007) investigated signs of moral evaluation in much younger children. How did they adapt their methods compared to traditional approaches like Kohlberg's?

They removed verbal demands to create scenarios infants could understand

41
New cards

What social influence, besides parents, did Piaget and Kohlberg both argue was crucial for the development of moral judgment?

Negotiating with peers