1/31
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
measurements of radiation
exposure → capacity of x-rays to ionize air
Roentgen: 1R = 2.58 × 10-4 C/kg
absorbed dose → amount of radiation energy absorbed by patient
Gray: 1 Gy = 1 J/kg
equivalent dose → adjusted amount of dose, taking into account the type of radiation
Sievert: 1 Sv = 1 Gy
equivalent dose = absorbed dose x radiation weighting factor
effective dose → takes into account the specific types of tissues being irradiated
also measured in Sievert, but has a different meaning than equivalent dose
radiation weighting factors
x-rays, gamma rays, beta particles → 1
protons → 2
alpha particles → 20
tissue weighting factors
relative measure of stochastic effects
WT = 0.12 → stomach, colon, lung, red bone marrow, breast, remainder tissues
WT = 0.08 → gonads
WT = 0.04 → urinary bladder, esophagus, liver, thyroid
WT = 0.01 → bone surface, skin, brain, salivary glands
direct effects of radiation
x-rays directly producing free radicals makes up 1/3 of x-ray effects
RH + x-radiation → R’ + H+ + e-
molecule in body associated with hydrogen is irradiated, resulting in a free radical + H+ + e-
radiation interacts with body, where ionizing radiation can be dangerous
free radical dissociation fates:
dissociation: R’ → X + Y’
cross-linking: R’ + S’ → RS
radiolysis of water causes formation of hydroperoxyl free radicals, and can contribute to the formation of hydrogen peroxide in tissues which are the primary toxins produced in tissues by ionizing radiation
H’ + O2 → HO2’
HO2’ + H’ → H2O2
HO2’ + HO2’ → O2 + H2O2
indirect effects of radiation
free radicals cause damage to organic molecules by removing hydrogens, happening 2/3 of the time
RH + OH’ → R’ + H2O
RH + H’ → R’ + H2
chain reaction of radicals interacting to form more radicals
DNA effects from radiation
DNA damage
double or single-strand breaks
cross-linking DNA strands
formation of rings and dicentrics → lethal changes
dicentric: chromosome with two centromeres
DNA base deletion or substitution
hydrogen bond disruption
deterministic effects
lethal DNA damage → lethal to cell
occurs when radiation exceeds a threshold level
does not occur below threshold level
severity of effect is proportional to dose
decreased tissue and organ function
xerostomia, osteoradionecrosis, cataracts, fetal development effects
acute radiation syndrome (at very high levels)
prodromal period
early stage of radiation sickness, experienced for minutes to hours after exposure
anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, weakness, fatigue
the higher the dose, the more rapid and more severe the symptoms
latent period
time between radiation exposure and when the effects can be seen, occurring after exposure of >2Gy
interim period between prodromal period and syndromic periods
apparent well-being, where subject is temporarily asymptomatic
the higher the dose, the shorter the latent period
hematopoietic syndrome
acute radiation syndrome when bone marrow is damaged by dose of ionizing radiation
occurs with exposure of 2-7Gy
rapid fall in granulocytes, platelets, and erythrocytes
mature cells are resistant to radiation, but new cells are greatly affected and can cause mutations in newly formed cells
death may or may not occur 10-30 days after irradiation
rare at 2Gy, much more common at 7Gy
gastrointestinal syndrome
acute radiation syndrome that occurs when body receives a very high dose of ionizing radiation
occurs with exposure of 7-15Gy
rapid loss of epithelial layer of intestinal mucosa → cannot get nutrients
lethal, with death within two weeks
fluid and electrolyte loss, infection, and nutritional impairment
cannot intake through IV because circulatory system is also not working
cardiovascular and central nervous system syndrome
deadliest acute radiation syndrome happening at extremely high doses of ionizing radiation
occurs with exposure >50Gy
very few reported cases
total collapse of circulatory system
death in 1 to 2 days
stochastic effects
sub-lethal → doesn’t kill the cell but can cause mutations that can lead to cancers
no minimum threshold for causation
probability of occurrence increases as dose increases
replication of mutated cells
leukemia, thyroid cancer, salivary gland tumors, heritable disorders
potentially affected oral tissues from x-ray radiation
mucous membranes → mucositis
taste buds → reversible loss of taste
salivary glands → xerostomia, resulting in difficulty with food intake
teeth → caries secondary to xerostomia
bone → damage to vasculature, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts that lead to osteoradionecrosis
musculature → inflammation and fibrosis leading to trismus, difficulty opening mouth
general → candidiasis or fungal infection due to suppression of immune system
radiosensitivity
governed by law of Bergonie and Tribondeau
the most radiosensitive cells have a high mitotic rate, undergo many future mitoses, and are most primitive in differentiation
spermatogenic and erythroblastic stem cells, basal cells of oral mucous membrane
lymphoid organs, bone marrow, testes, intestines, mucous membranes
cell cycle phases from most to least sensitive → mitosis, G2, G1, S
radiation effects on embryos and fetuses
1-3Gy radiation in the first few days after conception can cause embryo death
congenital malformations can occur with 0.1Gy threshold
developing organs are most susceptible at 3-8 weeks
brain is most susceptible at 8-15 weeks
suspected dose from FMX with leaded apron = 0.25mcGy
natural background dose to embryo and fetus = 2250mcGy = 8mcGy/day
radiation increases probability of leukemia and other types of cancers
assumed that embryos and fetuses have the same risk as children, which is 3x that of adults
consideration for thyroid cancer
children are up to 5x more susceptible
females are 2-3x more susceptible than males
when thyroid is in direct path of radiation and it won’t interfere with image, use a thyroid collar in children
linear energy transfer (LET)
pattern or rate of how energy is transferred from the radiation to the body as it penetrates further into the tissues
x-rays are low LET, but particulate radiation like alpha particles have higher LET
the greater the LET, the greater the effect on the patient since effects are more localized
modifying factors for radiation
dose → the greater the dose, the greater the effects on the patient
dose rate → the more rapidly the dose is administered, the greater the effects on the patient
oxygen → the more oxygen in the environment, the greater the effect on the patient
linear energy transfer (LET) → the greater the LET, the greater the effect on the patient
background radiation
radiation from the environment
at higher elevation, the atmosphere is less thick and has less protection from cosmic radiation
makes up about 50% of average annual effective dose of ionizing radiation
cancer risk
primary risk from dental radiography due to stochastic effects
common disease that affects 40% off all people and accounts for 20% of all deaths
ample evidence that links large radiation exposure to risk (>100mGy)
uncertainty regarding risk from low-dose exposure
theories for radiation
linear no-threshold theory
assume linear relationship from background dose and incidence to data points from high doses
threshold theory
no change to danger until threshold is reached
hormetic model
radiation can be beneficial at low radiations and is dangerous when it reaches a threshold
radiation protection guiding principles
justification → identify situations where benefit exceeds risk
optimization → use very reasonable mean to reduce exposure to patients, staff, and yourself to follow ALARA
dose limitation → legal limitations are placed on occupational and public exposures, but no limitation on patient exposure but justification ensure benefit outweighs risk
means for reducing x-ray exposure
use selection criteria to assist in determining type and frequency of radiograph examinations
use E/F-speed films or digital sensors
use holders to support film or digital sensors intraorally
make exposures with 60 to 70 kVp
use long collimators
use rectangular collimation for periapical and bitewing images
use thyroid collars
stand at least 6ft away from patient and away from x-ray machine when making exposure
use rare-earth screens for panoramic and cephalometric film imaging or use digital systems
reduce cone-beam CT beam field of view to region of interest
source to skin distance
use of long source-to-skin distances of 40cm, rather than short distances of 20cm
decreases exposure by 10-25%
distances between 20-40cm are appropriate but longer distances are optimal
rectangular collimation
rectangular collimator decreases radiation dose by up to fivefold as compared with circular one
radiographic equipment should provide rectangular collimation for exposure of periapical and bitewing radiographs
filtration
low-energy photons are mostly absorbed by the patient, contributing to patient dose but not to the image
preferentially removing photons decreases patient exposure with no loss of radiographic information
with filtration of 3mm aluminum, surface exposure is reduced to about 20% of the exposure with no filtration
federal government has instigated a minimum filtration of an equivalent half-value layer of 1.5mm aluminum
leaded aprons
lead aprons are now unnecessary according to NCRP, ADA, and AAOMR, but reducing exposure in main beam is more important
very slight gonadal exposure from dental radiographs
heritable effects are essentially insignificant
most states still require them
potential to trap internal exposure
use thyroid collar if minimize radiation exposure
kilovoltage
optimal operating potential of dental x-ray units is between 60 to 70 kVp
too low → increases patient dose due to increased amount of non-diagnostic lower-energy photons
too high → increases patient dose and decreases contrast of the resulting image
milliampere-seconds
operator should set amperage and time settings for exposure of dental radiographs of optimal quality
referred to as “mAs”
radiograph is of diagnostic density, neither overexposed (too dark) nor underexposed (too light)
correct density should show very faint soft tissue outlines
position-and-distance rule
operator should stand at least 6ft from the patient, at an angle of 90-135 degrees to the central ray of the x-ray beam
use barrier protection when possible, with barriers containing leaded glass window to enable operator to view patient during exposure
talking with patient about radiation
speak clearly and confidently
allow them to express thoughts/concerns
acknowledge their concerns
explain the reason for the exam
describe how you try to reduce patient exposure
point out how small the exposure is in terms of natural background radiation