1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Characteristics of a successful place
High rate of employment
Inward migration (internal + international)
Low deprivation
High property prices
Skill shortages
Berkshire, UK - a successful urban region
Employment: 50% of workers in managerial, knowledge based + professional occupations (quaternary + quinary sector)
Migration: Recruited 7000- 11 000 workers from outside EU. 40% migrate for work.
Deprivation: 0.4% neighbourhoods classed as deprived by the IMD.
Property prices: Price has risen by 40-50% between 2005-2015. Prices are out of reach for 20% of pop. in the county.
Skills shortage: high competition with London, immigration of high-skill jobs drives demand for services, but is doesn’t meet supply of skilled workers.
Multiplier effect
Industries attracted to area→creates more jobs→improved labour+higher incomes→increased demands for goods+services→creates more jobs to cater for growing demand
Worcestershire- successful rural region
Growing faster than many large urban areas in terms of population + economic output.
growth in small businesses, leisure, tourism- tourism brings £500M revenue annually
transports, cyber + technology innovations e.g. motorways to London, Malvern Hills Science Park attract highly skilled professionals to live in rural locations.
Unsuccessful regions: Rust-Belt, USA
Causes of decline
Region of the North East USA that suffered from the decline in metal manufacturing since 1950s. Detroit, Chicago, Pittsburgh.
CAUSES
Overseas competition+outsourcing e.g. China produced same products for lower cost.
Mining companies using machinery leading to less jobs + unemployment.
Consequences of industrial decline in Detroit, Rust-Belt, USA
Spiral of decline causes social deprivation:
Education: <30% graduate from high school.
Health: Life expectancy of 69 years old.
Crime: 2nd highest murder rate of any US cities in 2014.
Access to services: severe shortages of public sector workers (teachers, nursers)
Living environment: pop. declined by more than 50% from 1970-2015
Different communities needing regeneration
Social segregation: Low income households restricted to low cost housing.
Residential sorting: High income households seeking to cluster together.
Communities
Declining rural settlements: Rural areas where the quality of life + deprivation is seen to be worsening.
-regeneration for housing, health, employment. Llansilin, Powys, Wales (pop. 700) scored 50% on deprivation index.
Commuter villages: Settlement where large proportion of residents commute daily to cities for work.
-regeneration for service precision + affordable housing as avg house price over £500k
Sink Estates: Housing estates characterised by high levels of economic+social deprivation+crime, especially domestic violence, drugs + gang warfare. e.g. the Barracks in Glasgow
-regeneration for low income groups who need social assistance being segregated from the rest of society.
Gated communities: Wealthy residential areas that are fenced off + have security gates and entry systems.
-regeneration needed as locals are socially segregated from the gated community.
Engagement
The interaction between the people who have control (e.g. gov) and the general population.
Types of engagement
Political: voting, members of party, activists
Community+voluntary: community groups, charity, faith groups, PTA’s.
Factors influencing political engagement
Age: 18-24 half as likely to vote as 65+.
Ethnicity: Ethnic groups are less likely to be involved with community engagement- lack of information.
Gender: Even between men and women, although women are more likely to be engage in community activities.
Length of residence: People who have lived in an area for longer have more of a lived experience- want their voices heard.
Levels of deprivation: Deprived areas have little involvement in engagement + politics, creating a cycle as they are more and more excluded.
Successful communal engagement: Grampound, Cornwall
General store closed in 2013 due to retirement.
-locals decided to open a shop + coffee shop run by village.
257 out of 280 households became shareholders
countryside fund awarded £19 000
grants, charities raised £10 000
overall the village raised over £50 000
Demographics in Grampound, Cornwall
AGE
18.7% of population is over 65, compared to 14.2% nationally- more time to spend on community activities.
TIME
Has a low rate of short term residents- people are more likely to stay for a long time + be invested in the local area.
GENDER
More women engage in community work. In Grampound, women were in the majority of many working groups + committees.
ETHNICITY
In some cultures e.g. Bangladesh culture, sense of community organisation + engagement is stronger.
Factors affecting variations in engagement
Engagement at 3 levels: EU referendum (national), mayoral elections (local), local elections (local community groups)
Factors impacting these: %born abroad, %working population with a degree, IMD score, average age.
National election turnout in UK: low incomes less likely to vote, rural areas are more likely to vote, older people more likely to vote than younger people, only 55% ethnic minority groups voted.
Local election turnout in UK: often below 40% as people don’t engage with local communities.
factors influencing decision to vote: language barriers, lack of trust in politicians, lack of sense of belonging, feeling no one has influence e.g. disadvantaged groups
Local community groups: NIMBY groups protest over planned developments e.g. Blackpool residents on natural gas extraction, some community groups focus on fundraising +helping the vulnerable e.g. food banks
Conflicts over regeneration- Olympic Games 2012
REASONS:
Groups disagree about what regeneration is for
Inequality- local people fear that only those with incomes will benefit from regeneration. e.g. university towns
Conflicts arising from Olympics regeneration
Newham council demolished the ‘Carpenters’ estate, with UCL campus building replacing it.
+UCL specialised in science + high tech- new jobs + skills created as a result, in order to regenerate the area.
-local residents were forced out their homes, breaking up community- social costs arise. Campaign group formed ‘Carpenters Against Regeneration Plan’ to battle local authority + question the treatment of local residents being ignored.
Investment in infrastructure (Olympic Park)
+urban renewal of Olympic Park, 40% of new homes are ‘affordable’ (2800 homes) in Olympic village.
-unaffordable to Newham’s poorest households, where 1/3 mainly consist of workless households.
-few jobs created for local people during construction. There was still high levels of unemployment in Tower Hamlets, missed opportunity to train people for work. This still leaves it deprived + with residents living in poverty.
The need for regeneration in Custom House- factors determining need for regeneration
Statistical evidence (determining the need)
Median household income: 31 840 compared to london avg of 51 770
Qualification levels: high % with no qualifications 25.3% compared to London average of 17.6%.
IMD: 2, meaning it is in the 20% most deprived areas.
EQI: 10/34- buildings are poor, general quality is poor.
Media (questioning the need)
Evening standard newspaper: “Crossrail is a huge boost for custom house. It is currently out on a limb, served only by the DLR.“
Oral accounts: “We were initially in favour of regeneration, as our homes were below standard. Now rents are higher + people’s health has deteriorated because of stress.'“ - Betty O’Connell.
-subjective: some places depicted as worse for dramatic effect, some portray favourable image
Different representations- portrayal of place from images, news, documentaries (influencing the perceived need)
Local authority: highlighted areas of decline, established LDDC
News reports: The Times documented abandonment of wharves.
Documentaries: focused on job losses due to containerisation.
-may not represent whole community
-small no. may be interviewed
-selective images