1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
what did emilie durkheim come up with
anomie, mechanical vs. organic societies, crime is normal, collective conscience
anomie was foundation for strain theory and control theory
who came up with anomie
emilie durkheim
emilie durkheim (1858-1917) overview (no details)
aftermath of french revolution, rapid industrialization, traditional ways of life breaking down, new form of society emerging
key contribution to sociology - study of social solidarity aka how societies maintain cohesion and what binds individuals together
two types of societies - mechanical and organic (most are on a spectrum between the two)
crime is normal - one of his most famous ideas
anomie - breakdown of social norms
in Le Suicide, linked anomie to feelings of isolation and purposelessness in a rapidly changing society
ideas about anomie and crime laid foundation for:
strain theory - people turn to crime when society fails to provide them with legit means to achieve goals
control theory - crime when individuals lack strong social ties or committments to conventional norms and values
mechanical vs organic societies
emilie durkheim
mechanical - primitive, small-scale
individuals share similar roles, values, and beliefs
little division of labor
solidarity comes from sameness
law is repressive - punishes those who deviate from uniform norms to maintain order
organic - modern and complex
social cohesion from the diversity of roles
different groups that specialize in different tasks depend on each other
laws about regulation and restitution
managing relationship between different parts of society
durkheim said most societies are somewhere along a spectrum between mechanical and organic
“crime is normal”
emilie durkheim
in a mechanical society, crime serves a purpose by showing what behaviors society will not tolerate
as societies move toward organic, they can experience a state of anomie - breakdown of social norms
anomie can lead to confusion, uncertainty, and more prevalent crime
collective conscience and crime
durkheim
shared values and beliefs of a society
mechanical societies - pressure to conform to shared values
moral disapproval or criminal punishment
crime happens when people deviate from collective conscience
no society can’t be perfectly uniform
but crime isn’t a bad thing that we should be eliminating
why crime good ?!?!?
durkheim
crime (punishment) reinforces social norms
punishment is less about deterrence or retribution, but more about maintaining social solidarity
more like general deterrence as opposed to specific deterrence
existence of criminals helps the rest of society feel morally superior
societies define behaviors as criminal to mark boundaries between good and bad
punishing criminals reaffirms good values, can strengthen social cohesion
crime is necessary for progress and is a sign of a healthy society
if no one ever deviated from collective conscience, no room for social change
society with no crime overly controlled, no room for individual freedom
crime reflects diversity of human behavior
discussion:
things were illegal 50 years ago and legal now
but at a certain point crime becomes a symbol of a dysfunctional society
crime as activism - acting as checks and balances, saying we should reevaluate what is criminal
anomie and when it happens
durkheim
in organic societies, interdependence requires proper regulation to maintain harmony
anomie aka normlessness occurs when the regulation breaks down
individuals don’t know what is expected of them or how to achieve fulfillment
anomie especially when rapid social change
traditional norms break down, new ones not established yet
economic expansion - no clear regulation, feel lost with new possibilities
economic depression - thrust in lower social positions, identity and place in society lost, forced to limit desires, feelings of frustration and hopelessness
le suicide (1897)
durkheim observed that suicide rates increased not only in times of economic decline but also economic prosperity
both situations cause rapid social change, disrupting society’s stability to regulate desires and expectations
what did robert k merton talk about
anomie in american society, cultural goals vs institutionalized means, five adaptations
who thought of anomie in american society and 5 adaptations with cultural goals and institutionalized means
robert k merton
robert k merton overview
anomie in american society
pressure to achieve success (particularly monetary) but not everyone has access to legitimate socially approved means
strain from disparity between cultural expectations and social realities
cultural goals vs. institutionalized means
anomie from disconnection between the two
five adaptations: conformity, innovation, ritualism, retreatism, rebellion
cultural goals (CG) vs institutionalized means (IM) and anomie
merton
cultural goals - what society expects people to strive for
pursuit of wealth
wealth seen as marker of personal worth and social status
institutionalized means - socially approved ways to achieve
hard work, education, honesty, deferred gratification
anomie when disconnection between the two - people don’t have the same opportunities to achieve success
anomie (normlessness) - rules about how to achieve success become weakened or irrelevant
people experiencing the strain may result to nonconformist or deviant behaviors to achieve culturall imposed goal of wealth
merton’s 5 adaptations (just name them)
conformity
innovation
ritualism
retreatism
rebellion
conformity
accepts CG and IM
striving for wealth through hard work, education, and legit efforts, even if it fails
most common form of adaptation in stable societies
innovation
accept CG, reject IM
devise new, often illegal ways for success
white-collar crime (fraud), working-class crime (robbery, drug dealing)
very common deviant behavior because it reflects society’s overemphasis on success
ritualism
reject CG, accept IM
given up on achieving wealth, but continue following societal norms and work hard
often in middle class when individuals want to play safe and not lose what they have
retreatism
reject CG, reject IM
drop out of society and society’s expectations
substance abuse, homelessness
rebellion
reject and replace CG and IM
not addicted to drugs or homeless
advocating for new social order, cultural revolution, spiritual awakening
reject pursuit of wealth but propose alternative values
how does merton’s theory explain crime in american society
cultural imbalance between strong emphasis on achieving success and weaker emphasis on how to achieve success
people pressured to achieve wealth at all costs, even if violating social norms
social structure explains why crime is more concentrated in lower classes
merton’s model of strain
pressure to achieve wealth in american society + unequal distribution of legit opportunities = adaptation (possibly deviance and crime)
macro level: success goals + deficient means → strain → adaptation (possibly crime)
success goals emphasized for everyone, but means vary by location in society
adaptations occur depending on level of anomie
how other scholars expanded on merton’s work
richard cloward - individuals in lower-class neighborhoods often have access to illegit means, like criminal networks
albert cohen and cloward and ohlin - how young males from lower-class background adapt to strain through deviant subcultures
discussion: social media is changing our perception of success
what did albert cohen think of
middle-class measuring rod (lower class delinquency bc fail to achieve middle class standards)
who came up with middle class measuring rod
albert cohen
albert cohen (1955) overview
builds on merton’s ideas but focuses on status rather than wealth
adult crimes have clear purpose (e.g. money or goods)
but youths engage in vandalism, theft they don’t need, unprovoked violence - because they seek status
competition for status in schools - middle-class institutions, values, norms
middle-class measuring rod - how middle class values are used to measure success of all students
lower class youth unable to meet standards → frustration, failure
also lack social skills
conform or rebel? conform to middle-class values and accept lower position, or rebel and find status in different ways (e.g. toughness, recklessness)
formation of delinquent gang - separate set of values that directly opposes middle-class norms
behaviors menat to reject middle-class values and establish new system of values that gives gang members power and status
merton vs cohen
merton focuses on innovation as a way to achieve wealth
cohen shows much of juvenile crime is not about wealth, rather about rebelling against middle-class norms and gaining status
delinquency disproportionately affects lower-class youth - more failure in middle-class school system
parents with lower-class occupations may teach them different values before they even enter school
what did richard cloward and lloyd ohlin research
3 different gang subcultures (typology of gangs)
who talked about 3 different gang subcultures (typology of gangs)
richard cloward and lloyd ohlin
cloward and ohlin overview
why do certain groups of young people engage in certain delinquent behavior? unequal opportunity to achieve goals
different types of gang subcultures emerge based on availability of legitimate and illegitimate opportunities in a community
argued that merten didn’t fully consider this
no legitimate means does not automatically mean they have access to illegitimate means
used shaw and mckay’s social disorganization theory - crime linked to breakdown of social institutions
also social differentiation theory - criminal behavior is learned like other behaviors
identified 3 main subcultures - criminal, conflict, and retreatist
it’s not just the lack of legitimate opportunity that leads to delinquency, but also the type of illegitimate opportunities available
environment plays a crucial role
3 main gang subcultures
criminal subculture - serious delinquents not concerned with middle-class status, motivated by economic success
similar to merten’s innovation adaptation
neighborhoods with established networks of adult criminals - teach youth crime skills
young person who can’t achieve success legitimately might join gang
conflict subculture - acting out against society through malicious/violent acts
aligns with non-utilitarian delinquency described by cohen
areas with less established criminal networks
turn to violence to gain respect - gang with turf wars or fights
lacking legit & illegit means, so violence becomes the outlet
retreatist subculture - give up on pursuit of success, drop out of society, turn to substance abuse
failure in both legit & illegit means, given up
policy implications of anomie/strain theories (2 specific programs)
suggest that crime occurs when individuals, particularly from lower social class backgrounds, don’t have opportunities to achieve success via legitimate means
juvenile delinquency prevention & control act of 1961
focus on social structures that contribute to delinquency
robert kennedy was a fan of cloward and ohlin
comprehensive action program - improving education, creating work opportunities, community organization, services for individuals and families
access to education for lower-class youth
job training for disadvantaged communities
very significant actions - federal effort to combat youth crime
lyndon johnson’s war on poverty
aimed to tackle poverty and crime on a national scale
addressing root causes of social inequality
spent billions of dollars to programs to uplift lower-class communities, improve access to education and employment
very ambitious goal
policies faced massive political resistance
people opposed to idea of extending resource and opportunities to lower-class individuals
policies dismantled under nixon
never reached full potential
political opposition was one major reason for the programs’ failure
who came up with general strain theory
robert agnew
what did robert agnew come up with
general strain theory
general strain theory overview
3 main sources of strain:
failure to achieve goals
removal of positive stimuli
presence of negative stimuli
strain generates negative emotions, which leads to seeking coping mechanisms
cognitive coping
behavioral coping
emotional coping
strain can lead to delinquency and crime
3 main sources of strain + details
failure to achieve goals
not just monetary, but any valued goals
strain from discrepancy between expectations and achievements, or what individuals see as fair outcomes and what they actually receive
e.g. wants to be lawyer but can’t get into law school, wants promotion but can’t get it
removal of positive valued simuli
breakup, loss of parents
presence of negative stimuli
exposure to harmful conditions, abuse, neglect, bullying, harsh discipline
adolescents particularly vulnerable to this because they can lack the opportunity to escape from negative environments
strain → negative emotions and coping mechanisms
healthy and unhealthy coping mechanisms
skipping school, vandalism, drug use, fighting
cognitive coping - changing the way you think about the strain to make it less distressing
downplay importance of failures, reframe experiences
cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) - therapist helps you reframe certain thoughts (e.g. you think everyone hates you, the therapist says is that a fact or a thought)
young people prone to delinquency might think theyre not smart enough to get a job → challenge these thoughts to achieve better self
behavioral coping - take action to reduce strain
try to escape strain, run away from home, skip school
retaliate against source, sometimes through delinquent behavior
emotional coping - e.g. substance abuse to numb pain, delinquent acts for temporary relief
healthy coping mechanisms: exercising, hobbies
unhealthy coping mechanisms: delinquency, criminal acts
takeaways of GST
focuses heavily on delinquents and coping mechanisms
research supports agnew’s arguments that negative relationships and stressful life events can be linked to various forms of delinquency