Chapter 1 - Why Philosophy

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/51

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

From Vaughn Textbook, Topics: The Quest for Understanding; Socrates and the Examined Life; and Thinking Philosophically

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

52 Terms

1
New cards

What is the greatest practical benefit of studying philosophy?

It gives us the intellectual wherewithal to improve our lives by improving our philosophy of life

2
New cards

What is the greatest theoretical benefit of studying philosophy?

Similar to many other fields, it is understanding for its own sake → knowing how the world works just for the sake of knowing

3
New cards

What are the four main divisions of philosophy?

Metaphysics, epistemology, axiology, and logic

4
New cards

What is metaphysics?

The study of reality

5
New cards

What is epistemology?

The philosophical study of knowledge

6
New cards

What is axiology?

The study of value, including both aesthetic and moral value

7
New cards

What is logic?

The study of correct reasoning

8
New cards

What is the philosophical method?

The systematic use of critical reasoning to try to find answers to fundamental questions about reality, morality, and knowledge

9
New cards

What is ethics?

A part of axiology that is the study of morality using the methods of philosophy

10
New cards

Why did Socrates say that “the unexamined life is not worth living”?

For Socrates, an unexamined life is tragedy because it results in harm to the soul → the soul is harmed by lack of knowledge, ignorance of one’s self, and ignorance of the most important values in life

11
New cards

What is the Socratic method?

Question-and-answer dialogue in which propositions are methodically scrutinised to uncover the truth

12
New cards

How did Socrates use the Socratic method?

He would ask people about their views and then critically question these beliefs until they were exposed as false or confused → main point not to win arguments but to get closer to the truth

13
New cards

What is an argument?

A group of statements in which one of them (the conclusion) is supported by the others (the premises)

14
New cards

What is a statement?

An assertion that something is or is not the case and is therefore the kind of utterance that is either true or false

15
New cards

What is a conclusion?

In an argument, the statement that is being supported by the premises

16
New cards

What is a premise?

A statement that supports the conclusion of an argument

17
New cards

What two conditions must be met for an argument to be good?

A good argument must have solid logic and true premises

18
New cards

What is a deductive argument?

An argument intended to give logically conclusive support to its conclusion

19
New cards

What is an inductive argument?

An argument intended to give probable support to its conclusion

20
New cards

What is a valid argument?

A deductive argument that provides logically conclusive support to its conclusion

21
New cards

What is a strong argument?

An inductive argument that succeeds in giving very probable support to its conclusions

22
New cards

What is a weak argument?

An inductive argument that does not give probable support to its conclusions

23
New cards

What is a sound argument?

A valid deductive argument with true premises

24
New cards

What is a cogent argument?

A strong inductive argument with true premises

25
New cards

What is the argument form of modus ponens?

If p, then q.
p.

Therefore, q.

26
New cards

Is modus ponens valid?

Yes

27
New cards

What is the argument form of modus tollens?

If p, then q.

Not q.

Therefore, not p.

28
New cards

Is modus tollens valid?

Yes

29
New cards

What is the argument form of affirming the consequent?

If p, then q.

q.

Therefore, p.

30
New cards

Is affirming the consequent valid?

No

31
New cards

What is the argument form of denying the antecedent?

If p, then q.

Not p.

Therefore, not q.

32
New cards

Is denying the antecedent valid?

No

33
New cards

What is the straw man fallacy?

The fallacy of misrepresenting a person’s views so they can be more easily attacked or dismissed

34
New cards

What is the ad hominem fallacy?

The fallacy of rejecting a statement on the grounds that it comes from a particular person, not because the statement itself is false or dubious

35
New cards

What is the appeal to popularity fallacy?

The fallacy of arguing that a claim must be true not because it is backed by good reasons but simply because many people believe it

36
New cards

What is the genetic fallacy?

The fallacy of arguing that a statement can be judged true or false based on its source

37
New cards

What is the equivocation fallacy?

The fallacy of assigning two different meanings to the same significant word in an argument

38
New cards

What is the appeal to ignorance fallacy?

The fallacy of trying to prove something by appealing to what we don’t know → it is arguing that either a claim is true because it hasn’t been proven alse or that a claim is false because it hasn’t been proven true

39
New cards

What is the false dilemma fallacy?

The fallacy of arguing erroneously that since there are only two alternatives to choose from, and one of them is unacceptable, the other one must be true

40
New cards

What is the begging the question fallacy?

The fallacy of trying to prove a conclusion by using that very same conclusion as support

41
New cards

What is the slippery slope fallacy?

The fallacy of arguing erroneously that a particular action should not be taken because it will lead inevitably to other actions resulting in some dire outcome

42
New cards

What is the composition fallacy?

The fallacy of arguing erroneously that what can be said of the parts can also be said of the whole

43
New cards

What is the division fallacy?

The fallacy of arguing erroneously that what can be said of the whole can be said of the parts

44
New cards

What is motivated reasoning?

An obstacle to critical thinking in which reasoning is for the purpose of supporting a predetermined conclusion rather than to discover the truth

45
New cards

What is the availability error?

An obstacle to critical thinking in which we rely on evidence not because it’s trustworthy b because it’s memorable or striking (psychologically available)

46
New cards

What is the Dunning-Kruger effect?

An obstacle to critical thinking in which we are ignorant of how ignorant we are → the dumber you are the more confident you are that you are not actually dumb

47
New cards

What are the guidelines for reading philosophy?

  1. Approach the text with an open mind

  2. Read actively and critically

  3. Identify the conclusion first, then the premises

  4. Outline and paraphrase the argument

  5. Evaluate the argument and formulate a judgement

48
New cards

What does it mean for an argument to have solid logic?

The conclusion follows logically from the premises

49
New cards

What does it mean for an argument to have true premises?

What the premises assert must in fact be the case

50
New cards

What is confirmation bias?

An obstacle to critical thinking in which we resist conflicting evidence and only seek out and use confirming evidence

51
New cards

What is evidence?

Something that makes a statement more likely to be true

52
New cards

What is a fallacy?

A common but bad argument