Business Structure: Sole Proprietorship & Partnership

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/33

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards summarising key terms, statutes, partner types, duties, advantages/disadvantages, and dissolution rules for sole proprietorships and partnerships in Malaysia.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

34 Terms

1
New cards

Sole Proprietorship

A one-person business in which the owner provides capital, manages operations, enjoys all profits, and bears unlimited personal liability.

2
New cards

Partnership

Relationship between two or more persons carrying on business in common with a view of profit (s.3(1) Partnership Act 1961); not a separate legal entity.

3
New cards

Unlimited Liability

Owner(s) are personally responsible for all business debts; creditors can claim personal assets.

4
New cards

Registration of Businesses Act 1956 (ROBA 1956)

Malaysian statute requiring businesses to register with the Registrar/SSM within 30 days of commencing operations.

5
New cards

Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM)

Statutory body (formed 2002) that regulates companies and businesses after merging ROC and ROB.

6
New cards

Registrar of Companies (ROC)

Former body merged into SSM; previously regulated companies.

7
New cards

Registrar of Businesses (ROB)

Former body merged into SSM; previously regulated sole proprietorships and partnerships.

8
New cards

Factors in Choosing a Business Structure

Procedure, liability, continuity, transferability, and taxation considerations used to select an entity type.

9
New cards

Continuity of Business

Ability of a business to continue after an owner’s death; absent in sole proprietorships, limited in ordinary partnerships.

10
New cards

Transferability

Ease with which ownership interests can be transferred; restricted in partnerships without unanimous consent.

11
New cards

Active (General) Partner

Partner who participates in management and has unlimited liability.

12
New cards

Sleeping (Dormant) Partner

Partner who invests capital but does not take part in management; still bears unlimited liability.

13
New cards

Salaried Partner

Partner receiving fixed remuneration regardless of profit share; still treated as a partner in law.

14
New cards

Apparent (Quasi) Partner

Person held liable as partner due to ‘holding out’—representation that he is a partner (e.g., Bevan v National Bank).

15
New cards

Holding Out

Situation where a person represents or allows himself to be represented as a partner, creating liability to third parties.

16
New cards

Section 4 PA 1961

Lists relationships that resemble profit-sharing but are not partnerships (e.g., joint tenancy, lender receiving installments).

17
New cards

Fiduciary Duty of Partners

Obligation of honesty, full disclosure, avoidance of conflicts, and no unauthorized personal profit among partners (s.21 PA).

18
New cards

Law of Agency in Partnerships

Each partner is both principal and agent of the firm; acts of one bind all partners to outsiders.

19
New cards

Merbok MDF v Shuhaiza Shuib

Case confirming that misappropriation by one partner makes other partners civilly liable to clients.

20
New cards

Section 34 PA 1961

Automatic dissolution of partnership by expiry of fixed term, completion of a single venture, or notice in partnerships of undefined duration.

21
New cards

Section 35 PA 1961

Dissolution triggered by death or bankruptcy of any partner, subject to agreement.

22
New cards

Section 36 PA 1961

Dissolution when it becomes illegal for the firm to carry on its business.

23
New cards

Section 37 PA 1961

Court-ordered dissolution on grounds such as lunacy, permanent incapacity, misconduct, persistent breach, continual loss, or just and equitable reasons.

24
New cards

Pathirana v A. Pathirana

Illustrates breach of fiduciary duty where a partner used the firm’s Caltex agency for personal benefit.

25
New cards

Stekel v Ellice

Established that receiving a salary alone does not prove partnership; salaried partner may lack profit share.

26
New cards

Chooi Siew Cheong v Lucky Height Development

Held that a land-owner/developer joint venture lacked ‘business in common’; no partnership existed.

27
New cards

Soh Hood Beng v Khoo Chye Neo

Loan association case; court held activity was not ‘carrying on a business’, thus not a partnership.

28
New cards

Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)

Hybrid entity providing partners limited liability while allowing partnership-style flexibility; mentioned as an alternative structure.

29
New cards

Procedure to Retire from Partnership

Retiring partner must secure agreement releasing existing liabilities and give actual or public notice to avoid future liabilities.

30
New cards

Pooling of Capital

Advantage of partnerships where partners combine funds and expertise, enhancing business capacity.

31
New cards

Dilution of Management Control

Disadvantage in partnerships where adding partners reduces individual decision-making authority.

32
New cards

Minimal Capital Requirement

Advantage of sole proprietorship: can start with small funds and few formalities.

33
New cards

No Public Disclosure of Accounts

Privacy benefit for sole proprietorships and partnerships, unlike companies that must file audited statements.

34
New cards

ezbiz.ssm.com.my

Online portal for Malaysian citizens/permanent residents (18+) to register sole proprietorships or partnerships with SSM.